Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

The Democrats have been trying to impeach President Trump since the day he was inaugurated.

So what is taking so long ?  

Impeach !    Impeach !   Impeach !

Actually they haven't.

The Mueller Report, which was started before the Democrats took control of the House, cites many examples that could be considered illegal. The DOJ opinion says he can't be indicted, but could be impeached. But Pelosi didn't see political will for impeachment so Trump could claim he got off scot free. 

This changes things a bit. Clearly there is more political support to investigate this in impeachment hearings. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Hillary ad the Dems just did it so how can they call that a crime? Yeah I said Hillary. It's extremely relevant. Grow up.

So why wasn't she indicted? LOCK HER UP right? 

Posted
Just now, Boges said:

So then why use Hilary as justification for Trump's corruption? 

 

Because you said it was a crime....crimes don't just apply to Trump....or maybe you think that's the case.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

Because you said it was a crime....crimes don't just apply to Trump....or maybe you think that's the case.

So because Trump's AGs never got Hillary prosecuted that means he shouldn't be investigated for his own crimes? 

Again the Mueller Report highlight many potential crimes that took place. But the DOJ is protecting Trump. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Boges said:

So why wasn't she indicted? LOCK HER UP right? 

You tell me....? I've been asking the question for two years now but Dem suppoerters always thought it was ok until now. What changed?

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

You tell me....? I've been asking the question for two years now but Dem suppoerters always thought it was ok until now. What changed?

I didn't care, she's not POTUS.

But Trump should back up his rhetoric. 

Posted (edited)

I like how no one wants to address the fact that it appears the Trump Administration was locking away conversations he's had on a separate server to keep it away from intelligence officials. 

Sound familiar? 

Edited by Boges
Posted
2 minutes ago, Boges said:

I didn't care, she's not POTUS.

But Trump should back up his rhetoric. 

 

No, Trump should keep doing exactly what he has been doing.

That's how he won the presidency and turned the Mueller Report into a big fat nothingburger.

 

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Boges said:

This will be a case of the coverup being worse than the crime. 

The Whistleblower complaint isn't about the call, it's about the White House's attempt to make sure no one see's the call. 

It's astonishing the White House released the transcript yesterday. They must really think it cleared Trump. :lol:

Now, I don't know who is telling the truth here.

Last night, an ex WH staff said that WH changed the phone call policy long time ago. There is no more physical recording media, and the transcript is the only record. Now, we have a secret computer server to store the call contents :o

Posted
1 minute ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

No, Trump should keep doing exactly what he has been doing.

That's how he won the presidency and turned the Mueller Report into a big fat nothingburger.

I like prodding you guys all with arguments until you resort to: 

"FINE!!!! Trump's just gonna get reelected anyway!!!!"

I accept your surrender. :lol:

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, egghead said:

Now, I don't know who is telling the truth here.

Last night, an ex WH staff said that WH changed the phone call policy long time ago. There is no more physical recording media, and the transcript is the only record. Now, we have a secret computer server to store the call contents :o

OK so printed documentation of the call. Semantics don't you think? 

Edited by Boges
Posted
6 minutes ago, Boges said:

I like how no one wants to address the fact that it appears the Trump Administration was locking away conversations he's had on a separate server to keep it away from intelligence officials. 

Sound familiar? 

At least, the server is not in the trump tower basement :lol:

Posted
3 minutes ago, Boges said:

I like prodding you guys all with arguments until you resort to: 

"FINE!!!! Trump's just gonna get reelected anyway!!!!"

I accept your surrender. :lol:

 

You have been losing this argument more and more each day Trump has been U.S. president.

Why can't you get him with your keyboard (from Canada) ?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

You have been losing this argument more and more each day Trump has been U.S. president.

Why can't you get him with your keyboard (from Canada) ?

And you can't win from your keyboard in the US (allegedly). 

This is just a debate, but you've moved off defending Trump too BUT HILARY DID IT!!!!

Edited by Boges
Posted
Just now, Boges said:

And you can't win from your keyboard in the US (allegedly). 

This is just a debate, but you've moved off defending Trump too, BUT HILARY DID IT!!!!

 

I already won from my keyboard in 2016.

Hillary Clinton "broke the law"...so the bias is evident.

Trump can use this for the 2020 campaign.

 

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Trump can use this for the 2020 campaign.

Use what? I actually thought it was cool Trump won in 2016, I'm a conservative member. 

But he's shown himself to be a pathetically awful human being. 

Trump is going to defend illegal behaviour because of Biden and his son.

Someone he may not even face in 2020. . . if he makes it that far. :lol:

It'll be funny if he rails against Biden when facing against Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris. 

Edited by Boges
Posted
Just now, Boges said:

Use what?

Trump is going to defend illegal behaviour because of Biden. Someone he may not even face in 2020. . . if he makes it that far. :lol:

 

Trump can use the lack of Clinton prosecution (again).

Biden is still a front running Democratic candidate, and was VP when Hillary committed her crimes.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Trump can use the lack of Clinton prosecution (again).

Biden is still a front running Democratic candidate, and was VP when Hillary committed her crimes.

Would be a shame if he gets impeached for illegally trying to dig up dirt on Biden but ends up facing Warren? 

He'll threaten to audit "23 and Me" if they don't state that Warren has no First Nations background. 

Edited by Boges

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,910
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...