Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said:

If Obama can skate away with not a word from the press or intelligence agencies for his meddling and Hillary after releasing classified info then destroying evidence can be considered an "oopsy", then I hardly think what Trump did is worthy of all this.  This isn't about the "what", it's about the "who", it's all political.  

And, I think that the people who won the election, won't take it too well if in their perception Trump gets railroaded. 

The people didn't win the election. The EC stole it and gave it to Trump. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said:

If Obama can skate away with not a word from the press or intelligence agencies for his meddling and Hillary after releasing classified info then destroying evidence can be considered an "oopsy", then I hardly think what Trump did is worthy of all this.  This isn't about the "what", it's about the "who", it's all political.  

And, I think that the people who won the election, won't take it too well if in their perception Trump gets railroaded. 

This constant Obama and the Clinton's having done no wrong in the eyes of the fake and phony liberal media is getting beyond sickening. The only reason that the Clinton's are not in prison yet is because of the media who are purposely hiding their crimes from the people. Those traitors to America need to be exposed for their crimes against Americans. 

It is written that there will be a civil war in America if Trump does get railroaded by the lying democrats, and their lying liberal media. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Omni said:

The people didn't win the election. The EC stole it and gave it to Trump. 

No, it was the people that gave Trump the presidency. How could the EC steal the votes and give them to Trump? You are a bit baffled and confused, aren't you? 

Posted
1 minute ago, taxme said:

No, it was the people that gave Trump the presidency. How could the EC steal the votes and give them to Trump? You are a bit baffled and confused, aren't you? 

Go do a little studying on how the EC works, and then look up what actually occurred on the last election with regard to who the people actually vote for. Ignorance is not always bliss. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Omni said:

Go do a little studying on how the EC works, and then look up what actually occurred on the last election with regard to who the people actually vote for. Ignorance is not always bliss. 

Ignorance is not something you seem to want to ever shy away from. You appear to always want to enhance it. But hey. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, taxme said:

Ignorance is not something you seem to want to ever shy away from. You appear to always want to enhance it. But hey. 

Obviously you didn't take my advice. You wouldn't have had time to do all that studying. I'll give you a himt.EC stands for electoral college, and they elected Trump, not the voters. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Omni said:

The people didn't win the election. The EC stole it and gave it to Trump. 

Good grief, not this crap again.  They both knew the rules.  Hillary in her arrogance thought she could run the table and tried to turn republican states while ignoring her base - that's all that happened here.

BTW - One touchdown is worth more than 2 field goals.

  • Like 1

The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan


I have said that the Western world is just as violent as the Islamic world - Dialamah


Europe seems to excel at fooling people to immigrate there from the ME only to chew them up and spit them back. - Eyeball


Unfortunately our policies have contributed to retarding and limiting their (Muslim's) society's natural progression towards the same enlightened state we take for granted. - Eyeball


Posted
13 hours ago, Hal 9000 said:

This may be an honest response, but will get trolled by the not so bright but...

First lady's are almost expected to take on a pet project in this day and age.  Melania prefers to stay out of the limelight while Ivanka (first daughter) has some very real causes that she'd like to assist - mainly women's issues, and helping working/entrepreneurial women.  I think it's good cause regardless of her "hotness".  Women should be applauding her.

Her hotness is worth ten times as much to  the Saudis than Hillary's and we all know the Saudi's concern for women's issues is world renowned.:rolleyes:

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted
13 hours ago, Omni said:

Obviously you didn't take my advice. You wouldn't have had time to do all that studying. I'll give you a himt.EC stands for electoral college, and they elected Trump, not the voters. 

Taking your advice at any time would have me on par with you and your far left liberal views which I prefer to stay miles away from. Liberalism is a farce and phony ism. 

The EC had to go along with the people who voted in each state for the candidate that the people wanted as president. Therefore it was the people that voted Trump in, not the EC. If the EC did not go along with the candidate who got the most votes all hell could have probably broken out by those voters who were in the majority, and who voted for Trump. I know that you would have wanted to see the EC people go against Trump and vote for criminal Hillary. Too bad, so sad, it did not happen. :P

Posted
3 hours ago, Omni said:

So Flynn has chosen to ignore subpoenas to submit documents. That could get him a year of jail time. Why is he so loyal to Trump one wonders. 

When will justice be served by putting the Clinton's in jail for their crimes against America? That is the bigger question here that needs to be asked.

Why are you so loyal too liberalism is what I have to wonder and worry about. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Omni said:

You didn't study the EC much I see.

Apparently, you have not done much studying yourself as to who gets to have their say and who gets to vote for the next president? 

Posted
6 minutes ago, taxme said:

When will justice be served by putting the Clinton's in jail for their crimes against America? That is the bigger question here that needs to be asked.

Why are you so loyal too liberalism is what I have to wonder and worry about. 

The Clinton's have already been investigated, many times, long ago. That phase is over, move on.

Posted
4 minutes ago, taxme said:

Apparently, you have not done much studying yourself as to who gets to have their say and who gets to vote for the next president? 

I have, that's why I know how the EC works.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Omni said:

The Clinton's have already been investigated, many times, long ago. That phase is over, move on.

 

32 minutes ago, Omni said:

The Clinton's have already been investigated, many times, long ago. That phase is over, move on.

And by whom were the Clinton's being investigated by? Why her friend who just happens to be the director of the FBI. How sweet for the Clinton's. According to website RightEdition Comey let the Clinton's off four times for some crimes that they should be now in jail for because Comey and some of his family members were benefitting from Clinton related dealings. One can only hope that phase is not over and that Trump does not let it go, and will continue on with his war against the Clinton's and the democraps. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, taxme said:

 

And by whom were the Clinton's being investigated by? Why her friend who just happens to be the director of the FBI. How sweet for the Clinton's. According to website RightEdition Comey let the Clinton's off four times for some crimes that they should be now in jail for because Comey and some of his family members were benefitting from Clinton related dealings. One can only hope that phase is not over and that Trump does not let it go, and will continue on with his war against the Clinton's and the democraps. 

The Clinton's were investigated by independents appointed by the courts. Not by the FBI leader whom they could simply fire if they didn't like how the investigation was going. If you are going to try and make serious comments about serious subjects, you need to do a little research first. 

Footnote: you will perhaps be happy to know there is a movement ongoing in the US to remove the EC so that the POTUS will be elected by the people. Of the course you won't be happy as of course that would have put Hillary in the WH.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...