jacee Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 It's not much more complicated than that. Ken Deane died 13 years later and his testimony in 2006 wasn't likely to be much different than on any previous occasion. It was his and the local OPP's lapse in judgement that led to George's death. Blaming the provincial or federal legislators at the time is just the by-default redirection of blame up the chain of command. The feds have to settle land claims so protests aren't necessary. The province is also responsible for aboriginal rights agreements. The police only get stuck with these situations because the governments haven't acted. . Quote
Moonbox Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 The police only get stuck with these situations because the governments haven't acted. Police deal with protests on a regular basis. People usually don't get shot. Unhappiness with the government over land claim settlements is a conceivable cause for protests, but not for individual cops lapsing in judgement and shooting unarmed protesters. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Michael Hardner Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 The feds have to settle land claims so protests aren't necessary. The province is also responsible for aboriginal rights agreements. The police only get stuck with these situations because the governments haven't acted. . I think that governments should be doing a better job of communicating what is happening with claims. They seem to do the opposite, ie. under communicate and hope that difficult controversy goes away. I understood that the Douglas Estates / Six Nations protest resulted in some kind of negotiation process but from the wiki page, it just seems like a long string of piecemeal (peace-meal) incidents: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_River_land_dispute#2011 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
jacee Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 Police deal with protests on a regular basis. People usually don't get shot. Unhappiness with the government over land claim settlements is a conceivable cause for protests, but not for individual cops lapsing in judgement and shooting unarmed protesters. I agree absolutely. The police have treated Indigenous protesters like common criminals, but they aren't because their claims to land and resources are legitimate and are not being addressed in an effective and timely way. The governments have to deal more effectively with those claims to avoid things becoming a policing issue. So the Ipperwash Inquiry report held governments and police accountable. . Quote
PIK Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 (edited) LOL One dead cop, the cop was sniper wasn't he? He would have been watching him with a scope. he would have seen what was going on. And what about caladonia????? What about those poor people that were terrorized by these thugs, where is the outrage for them? Edited December 10, 2014 by PIK Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
jacee Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 I think that governments should be doing a better job of communicating what is happening with claims. They seem to do the opposite, ie. under communicate and hope that difficult controversy goes away. I understood that the Douglas Estates / Six Nations protest resulted in some kind of negotiation process but from the wiki page, it just seems like a long string of piecemeal (peace-meal) incidents: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_River_land_dispute#2011 One issue that has complicated negotiations re the former 'Douglas Creek Estates' land in Caledonia is that it is part off a much larger claim, the Plank Road claim, so can't really be negotiated individually, so attention shifted to other claims in hopes of some progress, an offer was made and rejected. http://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/lsuNegotiations.htm Since 2010, meetings have not continued in a formal format as previously held between all parties. I believe that Six Nations then resumed a litigation process (begun in 1995) http://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/lsuChronology.htm (click on list to download full chronology) It looks like the Discovery process (documentation) continues, but no hearings (Examination of Discovery) have yet occurred. . Quote
Moonbox Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 (edited) I agree absolutely. The police have treated Indigenous protesters like common criminals, but they aren't because their claims to land and resources are legitimate and are not being addressed in an effective and timely way. I'm not sure we're actually agreeing on much. While I can certainly agree that aboriginals are upset about the pace of land-treaty settlements, that's only a cause for protests. The governments have to deal more effectively with those claims to avoid things becoming a policing issue. So the Ipperwash Inquiry report held governments and police accountable. Obviously protests are undesirable, but it's a brutal logical fallacy to conclude that the government not complying with a group's demands/wants/needs leads to police shooting protesting members of that group. The Ipperwash Inquiry was full of non-sequiturs like that. Edited December 10, 2014 by Moonbox Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
jacee Posted December 10, 2014 Report Posted December 10, 2014 I'm not sure we're actually agreeing on much. While I can certainly agree that aboriginals are upset about the pace of land-treaty settlements, that's only a cause for protests. Obviously protests are undesirable, but it's a brutal logical fallacy to conclude that the government not complying with a group's demands/wants/needs leads to police shooting protesting members of that group. The Ipperwash Inquiry was full of non-sequiturs like that. We're not disagreeing on much either. From the wiki link: Acting Sergeant Ken Deane (October 1961 February 25, 2006) was convicted of criminal negligence causing death. ... he unsuccessfully appealed the verdict to the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada.[12][13] After a subsequent Police Act Hearing, Deane was convicted of Discreditable Conduct and ordered to resign in 7 days or be fired. Quote
Argus Posted December 11, 2014 Report Posted December 11, 2014 The feds have to settle land claims so protests aren't necessary. Which native band are you giving your house to? Alternatively, we could settle for a one time payment of only sixteen trillion dollars. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Argus Posted December 11, 2014 Report Posted December 11, 2014 I think that governments should be doing a better job of communicating what is happening with claims. They seem to do the opposite, ie. under communicate and hope that difficult controversy goes away. I understood that the Douglas Estates / Six Nations protest resulted in some kind of negotiation process but from the wiki page, it just seems like a long string of piecemeal (peace-meal) incidents: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_River_land_dispute#2011 As far as a 'negotiated process' I'm not aware the Ontario government did anything but buy the land off the owners after they were forced off it by native thugs, and then promised to turn the land over to the natives at some point in time. Meanwhile it's a garbage dump, and just about everyone in Caledonia now despises natives. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Michael Hardner Posted December 12, 2014 Report Posted December 12, 2014 ... then promised to turn the land over to the natives at some point in time. Really ? That's even more mind-boggling then. Why the delay ? Do you have a link for that ? I have friends who live in the area who may also have info, I'll ask them. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
overthere Posted December 12, 2014 Report Posted December 12, 2014 As far as a 'negotiated process' I'm not aware the Ontario government did anything but buy the land off the owners after they were forced off it by native thugs, and then promised to turn the land over to the natives at some point in time. Meanwhile it's a garbage dump, and just about everyone in Caledonia now despises natives. Other than the currency today is dollars rather than blankets and flour, the process sounds remarkably like how the Crown first came to possess First Nations land in the first place a long time ago. Fewer guns and overt racism today, but still... Quote Science too hard for you? Try religion!
drummindiver Posted January 1, 2015 Report Posted January 1, 2015 Yes I agree: The white thugs spewing racist crap in Caledonia and in Ipperwash are worthless. I heard that people of Caledonia ran some of those non-resident racist white thug instigators out of town this summer, throwing eggs and tomatoes at them. . You obviously have zero idea of what's happened in Caledonia. Quote
drummindiver Posted January 1, 2015 Report Posted January 1, 2015 Dudley's uncle: "If we'd had a gun there would have been one dead cop that night, but we didn't have any." . You are trying to defend their actions by this? That they would shoot a cop if only they had a gun? Quote
drummindiver Posted January 1, 2015 Report Posted January 1, 2015 I agree absolutely. The police have treated Indigenous protesters like common criminals, but they aren't because their claims to land and resources are legitimate and are not being addressed in an effective and timely way. The governments have to deal more effectively with those claims to avoid things becoming a policing issue. So the Ipperwash Inquiry report held governments and police accountable. . Are you serious? Treated like common criminals? They act like common criminals and nothing happens. This is what happens walking down the public street as a white person in Caledonia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N33t-zr1MrQ Start around the 17 min. mark. Native guys assault a vet, wrestle with 6 cops, yet they arrest a white person who did nothing. Reclaimed land? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtZhO_3Y5m0 Man almost killed. http://www.thespec.com/news-story/2142289-caledonia-assault-caught-us-off-guard-opp/ A car jacking with injuries. OPP do nothing. No charges. http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/004114.html No need to pay rent. Don't allow tax payers to walk down public roads. http://www.blogwrath.com/native-issues-2/violent-native-occupier-attacks-gary-mchale-in-caledonia/5828/ Two years less a day for almost killing a man and leaving him brain dead. Leniency because he was Aboriginal. http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/23/native-attacker-given-reduced-sentence-for-vicious-caledonia-assault/ The list goes on, though I'm sure you'll find a way to blame the tax paying law abiding non-natives in this conflict. Quote
jbg Posted January 2, 2015 Report Posted January 2, 2015 The list goes on, though I'm sure you'll find a way to blame the tax paying law abiding non-natives in this conflict.Well you have to understand. Their childhoods are messed up. They lack self-esteem. White people called them mean things. Or, to quote West Side Story, "they're depraved on account they're deprived." Looking at these things as double standards is simplistic. You have to get into believing in People's Justice. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
drummindiver Posted January 3, 2015 Report Posted January 3, 2015 Arrested for walking in public while white. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yppJiYXCIVI Quote
jbg Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 Arrested for walking in public while white. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yppJiYXCIVI I watched part of the video. There's no question that the white people should have the right to walk where they want. The issue is whether the police have the power to provisionally prevent obvious trouble. The beef that I have is that the police were doing nothing to stop the barracading of that road. And by the way there's another PM for you. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jacee Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 (edited) I watched part of the video. There's no question that the white people should have the right to walk where they want.This is Caledonia, not Ipperwash.That said, people can't walk on provincial land that is closed to the public. The issue is whether the police have the power to provisionally prevent obvious trouble. The beef that I have is that the police were doing nothing to stop the barracading of that road.It's provincial land, closed to the public.That idiot brigade has cost us all many many thousands in policing for their halfwit displays, and has since been unwelcome in that town. . Edited January 4, 2015 by jacee Quote
jacee Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 Well you have to understand. Their childhoods are messed up. They lack self-esteem. White people called them mean things. Or, to quote West Side Story, "they're depraved on account they're deprived." Looking at these things as double standards is simplistic. You have to get into believing in People's Justice. Snide comments aside, justice is in process ... /commentary-a-supreme-court-ruling-40-years-in-the-making aboriginal groups in Canada have won almost 200 court cases against government and industry, a string of judicial victories for aboriginal title that continued to pile up. Quote
jbg Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 Well you have to understand. Their childhoods are messed up. They lack self-esteem. White people called them mean things. Or, to quote West Side Story, "they're depraved on account they're deprived." Looking at these things as double standards is simplistic. You have to get into believing in People's Justice. Snide comments aside, justice is in process ... /commentary-a-supreme-court-ruling-40-years-in-the-making aboriginal groups in Canada have won almost 200 court cases against government and industry, a string of judicial victories for aboriginal title that continued to pile up. You must be a racist. I am saying that as a result of their severe deprivation literally any behavior on their part should be tolerated and encouraged. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jacee Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 You must be a racist. I am saying that as a result of their severe deprivation literally any behavior on their part should be tolerated and encouraged. And I am saying that they are acting on legitimate claims to the land, and winning cases in courts all the time. . Quote
Ash74 Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 And I am saying that they are acting on legitimate claims to the land, and winning cases in courts all the time. . That point you are correct but that does not explain the abuses that is being put upon the non natives in the area. We cannot change the sins of the past and ignoring the law when it suits the police is not the answer. Quote “Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains.”― Winston S. Churchill There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. –Robert Heinlein
jbg Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 That point you are correct but that does not explain the abuses that is being put upon the non natives in the area. We cannot change the sins of the past and ignoring the law when it suits the police is not the answer. To some extent the Courts may be responding to the reality that neither police nor society have the stomach to resist native demands. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jacee Posted January 4, 2015 Report Posted January 4, 2015 That point you are correct but that does not explain the abuses that is being put upon the non natives in the area. We cannot change the sins of the past and ignoring the law when it suits the police is not the answer. The police's first responsibility is upholding the Constitution. They try to keep the peace while Constitutional disputes are resolved by governments. So take your complaints to your MPP & MP. The police are doing the right thing. . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.