Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Because in my younger years I played and coached volleyball I was watching some women's beach volleyball covered on TV. I found the outfits "distracting" and was surprised that women's volleyball would need those kinds of outfits to maintain TV coverage (sic). I was disappointed and no longer interested in that "sport".

I also watched a few body building competitions, both men and women, and found the competitors appeared grotesque to me. Lots of people in the audience expressing their OOHS! and AAWHS! at the various poses so there must be a following.

Each to his/her own.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Because in my younger years I played and coached volleyball I was watching some women's beach volleyball covered on TV. I found the outfits "distracting" and was surprised that women's volleyball would need those kinds of outfits to maintain TV coverage (sic). I was disappointed and no longer interested in that "sport".

I also watched a few body building competitions, both men and women, and found the competitors appeared grotesque to me. Lots of people in the audience expressing their OOHS! and AAWHS! at the various poses so there must be a following.

Each to his/her own.

At my Gym I see some cartoonish looking humans. I can't see how someone can achieve a body like that with some PED.

There's this woman that must have some form of OCD, she's there every day doing this plyometrics with this heavy bag. She must be in her 50's but has an obvious 6-pack. At some point a focus on health actually detracts from enjoyment of life and doesn't ad to it. IMHO of course.

Edited by Boges
Posted

As for Volleyball. The dudes are going shirtless on the beach so it goes both ways. If you subscribe to the Big Ten Channel on cable you get women's court volleyball. They're in uniforms but they still wear short shorts.

Posted

as I recall, a few years ago the international organization governing womens beach volleyball forced all competitors in sanctioned events to wear the short shorts.

Marketing.

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Posted

as I recall, a few years ago the international organization governing womens beach volleyball forced all competitors in sanctioned events to wear the short shorts.

Marketing.

Much more eye candy watching women's tennis IYAM.

Posted

Why is it wrong to appreciate a physically beautiful human being for this physical beauty?

Because of all the bullshit that goes along with that. The fact is that "physical beauty" is a socially constructed ideal that changes over places and times. We then take our current ideal as some sort of gospel and particularly when it comes to women make snap judgments about behavioural and personality characteristics based on those socially constructed beauty ideals. That's not to mention that the ideal is an always moving goal that is nearly impossible to achieve and shouldn't be the value of a human being in the first place. So it's not "appreciating what you find beautiful" that's the problem. Appreciate all you want. It's the socially constructed baggage that comes along with it that causes problems.

Posted (edited)

is an athlete's skill or a worker's capability analogous to a woman's body image (real or perceived)? When, as you say, "measurable or physical attributes"... do you mean like, a woman's T&A? Certainly, many live vicariously through sports teams/stars; however, is that comparable to societal pressures driving many women (or many young girls, in particular) to attempt to attain an unreachable physical appearance, one simply not conducive to their underlying body makeup? And what feeds that driving societal pressure? ... does a beauty pageant contribute in that regard?

An athlete's skill is certainly more quantifiable and absolutely less subjective than the ever-changing beauty ideal. Person A runs faster than Person B. That can be measured. Person A is more beautiful than Person B? That's subjective and irrelevant to a person's capabilities and worth.

Edited by cybercoma
Posted

An athlete's skill is certainly more quantifiable and absolutely less subjective than the ever-changing beauty ideal. Person A runs faster than Person B. That can be measured. Person A is more beautiful than Person B? That's subjective and irrelevant to a person's capabilities and worth.

There are objective standards that can be applied to "attractiveness".

But to each their own so by no mean is it gospel. But no one is forcing anyone to align with some form of beauty.

The irony is people that often don't fit the formula are often seen as more attractive. Jennifer Lawrence is a good example of this.

Posted (edited)

no one is forcing anyone to align with some form of beauty.

No one is forcing you to because male role models can be valued for things other than beauty. although they're sometimes valued by equally demeaning standards to both men and women, i.e., the male "bread winner."

Edited by cybercoma
Posted

No one is forcing you to because male role models can be valued for things other than beauty. although they're sometimes valued by equally demeaning standards to both men and women, i.e., the male "bread winner."

I'm not talking about ME. I'm talking about anyone. Man or Woman.

Woman still seem to enjoy watching shows that glorify completely superficial elements of a person's appearance.

This isn't all about horny misogynist men deciding what's beautiful.

Posted

This is why we need more women on this forum.

You're the only woman who has replied to this thread (as far as I know).

Can I ask you something?

Did you reply to this thread because it interested you, or did you feel obligated to reply to it? Or did you feel any kind of obligation to comment in it?

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted

Did you reply to this thread because it interested you, or did you feel obligated to reply to it? Or did you feel any kind of obligation to comment in it?

Boss, those are deep penetrating questions! Clearly, MLW's board facilitator put forward the thread topic as a soothing pacifier... an appeasement, no less... to that 'rogue woman' running roughshod over this forum! Note: you are not obligated to reply to my post; however, if you have interest, please do so... at your liberty/discretion!

.

Posted

Someone fill me in on this boss stuff. I'll be in my cubicle.

I started that as a joke on a Saturday night in the chat room when there was 5 or 6 of us there. CA was there to.

I got a real kick out of it and was in tears laughing at how socialist thought I was being serious!

And it kind of grew from there. Some posters here get the joke and play along as we see from waldo.

But it looks like most posters here have very little appreciation for my humor so I better knock it off.

Sorry about the thread drift, back to debating!

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,021
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...