Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Ticketing on a whole is class thing. People can often speed with impunity if they can pay the fine.

Only to the point their license says goodbye.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Well, some of them would, and doubtless are for it as we speak. There's that "progressive super-rich" cadre.

But when it came down to it, I doubt it would take hold.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

Allowing law enforcement to write tickets will lead to many more people being assessed a fine and punished, when they would have simply been let go because of the hassle of taking someone to court over a small amount of pot.

This is completely the wrong approach. It should be decriminalized or legalized. No tickets, no criminal convictions for such a ridiculous "crime"/

Posted

Why not? Ticketing of all kinds are simply cash grabs, if you can charge people of a higher affluence more, then they become targets.

Good. Maybe then the "right people" would be making it an issue and the government will actually listen. Plus it might be nice for the Mercedes and Prsche drivers to endure a few illegal searches once in a while like their less afluent neighbours...

Posted

Decriminalization allows for ticketing. If something isn't "legal" then there has to be some penalty to using the product.

Not quite... decriminalization generally means that it is not illegal and usually is limited to small amounts. Essentially, it is ignored. No fines. No criminal record.

Legalization implies that it is regulated and taxed.

What you are saying is that speeding is a decriminalized activity. Well, no... that's not true. It is illegal to speed. There are fines, etc. associated with getting caught.

Posted

Because something is decriminalized doesn't mean it is legal. It means it is no longer part of the criminal code. Speeding is not a crime, it is a misdemeanor. Impaired driving on the other hand, is a crime.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Because something is decriminalized doesn't mean it is legal. It means it is no longer part of the criminal code. Speeding is not a crime, it is a misdemeanor. Impaired driving on the other hand, is a crime.

OK... my analogy may not have been the best one...

But when people talk about decriminalization, it is generally in the context of no penalties for small amounts.

Posted

In my neck of the woods, Norfolk County in Southern Ontario, the prime tobacco growing area of Canada, entrepreneurs are lining up to get into the action when pot finally becomes legalized. The consensus is that with what is happening in the USA that it is only a matter of time before growing marijuana becomes a major industry. There is money to be made here!

http://www.simcoereformer.ca/2014/02/02/norfolk-braces-for-industrial-scale-marijuana-production

Already happens here, and very very profitable.

Once can even invest, the return so far is out of this world! (as in all costs are 1/6th of sales)

Posted

Does a fine make you feel better about yourself or something? I guess calling it a tax would offend some libertarian image you like to project.

Most right wing conservatives are also very supportive of allowing corner stores to sell booze while also cutting taxes on it. Sound about right?

I like the odd toke and I do not want it legal and I do not support corner stores. And yes we get screwed on the price because of imcompetance at the LCBO.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted (edited)

I like the odd toke and I do not want it legal.

Thanks for the insight.

If most right-wingers are as self-loathing as PIK it would probably explain why so many right-wing prescriptions for society seem weird to the point of alienness.

I've always had a sense that some of the most fundamental problems with our political system is reflected in our country's treatment of drug use. One is the way in which the internalized self-oppression that minorities of Canadians (conservative one's in this case) suffer from can work it's way into public policies that can be imposed on and used to oppress everyone else.

Misery loves company I guess.

Edited by eyeball

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,018
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Dealsshutter
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...