Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 325
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Audits don't really have a tone, as I discussed with TimG. They are supposed to be an exploration of facts. I don't see why somebody would ask for the audit to be 'toned down'.

You have asked for the discussion of the audit to be toned down though, several times. I don't really understand. I'm not even sure what your position is. Let the discussion take its course.

Posted

Actually, it's obligated by law.

So change the law. Then they can go work for a living like the rest of us.

I don't think any reasonable interpretation of a treatie signed in the eighteen hundreds required us to pay for them to sit on their asses for ht enext three centuries.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

You have asked for the discussion of the audit to be toned down though, several times.

I don't really understand. I'm not even sure what your position is. Let the discussion take its course.

I have stated that if we`re going to expect the situation to improve, then we need to be specific in our criticisms, responsible in our discussion and pragmatic in our expectations.

Go through this thread and find people making general claims, unsubstantiated accusations and calling for the gauntlet to be thrown down unless immediate results are guaranteed - which we know won`t happen.

I ask for those 3 things only.

Feel free, though, to chastise posters like westguy who post that the funds were stolen and taken to Vegas.

Posted

So change the law. Then they can go work for a living like the rest of us.

I don't think any reasonable interpretation of a treatie signed in the eighteen hundreds required us to pay for them to sit on their asses for ht enext three centuries.

This is what I`m talking about - being pragmatic. It`s just just the law it`s the constitution. Do you think that this process will just happen ?

Furthermore, what happens when you have a people just scraping by and you cut them to zero ?

Posted

Feel free, though, to chastise posters like westguy who post that the funds were stolen and taken to Vegas.

You'll find that I don't respond to posters when I don't consider their views to be well thought out. I find your's to be generally. I'm not really sure what you're doing in this case.

Posted

I know for a fact that a reserve near me has now spent close to $10,000 on expenses related to INM and it's protests. That's one reserve. Imagine the amount of money being wasted.

Posted

Furthermore, what happens when you have a people just scraping by and you cut them to zero ?

People in need would still receive support outside of the current context.

Posted

I'm refusing to accept substandard dialogue on this issue is what I'm doing.

Most of the dialogue has not been substandard though. It's nice to say that we should only look to the future, but the future only comes through the recognition of past mistakes and problems.

Posted

Ok - so it wouldn't be zero. The point is - are we ready to deal with violence on this ? Is that what we want to do - to take a hard line, punish and see what happens ?

Violence doesn't nee to occur, but straight talk does.

Posted

Ok - so it wouldn't be zero. The point is - are we ready to deal with violence on this ? Is that what we want to do - to take a hard line, punish and see what happens ?

Maybe I'm missing the context here, but a hard line IMO wouldn't be about punishment but having a bottom line. If the other side then threatens or perpetrates violence, it needs to be dealt with the same way as any other criminal action. That may involve punishment at some point.

Posted

This is what I`m talking about - being pragmatic. It`s just just the law it`s the constitution. Do you think that this process will just happen ?

Furthermore, what happens when you have a people just scraping by and you cut them to zero ?

Welfare is available in the cities. So change the constitution. It's not undoable. If the natives cause too much trouble, or the idiots in black robes award absurd sums of money I bet there\d be an awful lot of support for the change.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Ok - so it wouldn't be zero. The point is - are we ready to deal with violence on this ? Is that what we want to do - to take a hard line, punish and see what happens ?

Hell, the natives are threatening violence even before they get to boycott the meeting they demanded...

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Ok - so it wouldn't be zero. The point is - are we ready to deal with violence on this ? Is that what we want to do - to take a hard line, punish and see what happens ?

Any violence would be instigated by the First Nations, and it would be an extremely regrettable decision on their part and wouldn't get them anywhere. That would galvanize popular support against them AND set the Courts against them as well.

What were really want here are honest, good faith dialogue and intentions. Theresa Spence has proven that she's not trustworthy . Her track record as well as recent behaviour have pretty much proven she's not acting in good faith nor is she willing to cooperate or compromise. For positive results, both sides need to have good faith and good intentions. If you want positive results from dialogue, don't throw your support behind a duplicitous idiot like her, who's moronic escapades have made the situation far worse than it needs to be, and expect the other side to have any measure of comfort/trust, or to listen fairly and seriously.

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted

So get Theresa Spence out of the picture and get a spokesperson with some credibility and common sense.

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted

....Her track record ... have pretty much proven she's not acting in good faith nor is she willing to cooperate or compromise.

This is an amazing statement considering The Crown has been dithering and not acting in good faith for decades.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

If only Canada had followed the USA's example in dealing with aboriginals, right?

Thanks for stopping by again bush. As always, your input is invaluable.

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,843
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...