Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Give it up to the Toronto Sun for being the only news organization with the integrity to investigate.

the 14 year old went for 3/3 in buying liquor, not only was he not asked to remove his burka to be id, he wasn't even asked to show id.

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/24/lcbo-serves-underage-boy-wearing-burka-face-veil

TORONTO - Three liquor stores in the GTA recently sold booze to a 14-year-old boy whose identity was hidden because he was wearing a full-length burka and face veil at the time.

The teenager, clad in an Islamic female’s traditional garb of a burka, headscarf and facial covering, shopped in three different LCBO stores north of Toronto last Wednesday.

In each location, the Grade 8 student paid cash for a bottle of Sambuca liqueur.

Edited by The Right One
  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I feel bad for the Clerks here. Had they asked the kid to take off the Burqa they'd have probably been disciplined for not being PC. Now that the story is out I wonder what will happen to them.

Wait Lickbo employees are Unionized public servants, they can't do anything that'll get them fired. :rolleyes:

I am sure teens everywhere are trying to get their hands on Burqua's as we speak.

Posted

Right. :lol: :lol: :lol:

14 year old pimply teen: "Excuse me, ma'am but could you take off your dress please ?"

Manager: "Not politically correct, son, you are fired."

There is a problem with the system if the employee gets fired for doing his job.

Posted

Not really sure what the story is supposed to prove.

Here in BC there was a story on the news a month or so ago about various liquor stores (government and private) that sold to a minor (the government does their own testing from time to time).

The kid didn't have to wear anything out of the ordinary and managed to buy liquor at numerous locations without being ID'd.

BFD.

Do the "sting" operations, let the stores know, expect them to enforce policy, and then check them again in the future.

Once again, BFD.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

Devout Muslims buying booze...lol.

:lol:

This is my reaction.

Anyone religious enough to wear a burqa would not, normally, buy alcohol. I would question the person on that account.

Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!

Posted

This is my reaction.

Anyone religious enough to wear a burqa would not, normally, buy alcohol. I would question the person on that account.

Can't speak for Canada, but in Saudi, you bet many women wearing burkas drink at home.

Posted

This is my reaction.

Anyone religious enough to wear a burqa would not, normally, buy alcohol. I would question the person on that account.

devout muslims are also not supposed to be terrorist and killed innocent people but you its quite the opposite.

Posted (edited)
Devout Muslims buying booze...lol.

They're not allowed to consume the fermented product of the grape or grain. Sambuca is made from licourice root and is permissable to them. I imagine that potato Vodka is also allowed. This is why he bought Sambuca as it is not out of the norm.

Anyone religious enough to wear a burqa would not, normally, buy alcohol. I would question the person on that account.

Okay, here we go again. The Burqa is not required by their religion, it is a cultural practise. This has been mentioned many many times in the past on these forums.

Edited by AngusThermopyle

I yam what I yam - Popeye

Posted

They're not allowed to consume the fermented product of the grape or grain. Sambuca is made from licourice root and is permissable to them. I imagine that potato Vodka is also allowed. This is why he bought Sambuca as it is not out of the norm.

I've heard that re: Vodka. Best ask the Imam.

;)

Posted (edited)

I can't believe you posted that in response to my fanciful dialogue. The whole story is ridiculous.

Yea. it is ridiculous that we are so afraid of these people that we won't even ask to see their faces before we sell them a controlled substance. Whats worse is that it isn't even them we are afraid of, it's the 'progressives', those who tell us our culture, our way of doing things, needs to take a back seat to other cultures in our country lest we offend. When you defend practices like these that is exactly what you are doing.

Edited by gunrutz
Posted

Yea. it is ridiculous that we are so afraid of these people that we won't even ask to see their faces before we sell them a controlled substance.

That's even more ridiculous.

Whats worse is that it isn't even them we are afraid of, it's the 'progressives', those who tell us our culture, our way of doing things, needs to take a back seat to other cultures in our country lest we offend.

You're afraid of progressives ? Don't be.

I might point out that this so-called news article didn't appear in a serious paper, it was the Toronto Sun. I hope that makes you feel a little better at least.

Posted

I might point out that this so-called news article didn't appear in a serious paper, it was the Toronto Sun. I hope that makes you feel a little better at least.

Snobbery at it's best. :rolleyes:

This was a stunt was done by the Menzoid. He does this kind of stuff all the time.

Now there's a serious implication of this issue where a woman tried to testify in court with her face covered and the Supreme Court heard arguments about that last year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/12/08/niqab-supreme-court-canada_n_1136295.html

The Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments Thursday in the case of a woman who wants to testify in court while wearing a niqab, in a legal matter that pits religious rights against the right of defendants.

The woman, identified only as N.S., wants to wear her niqab � a veil-type cloth that covers all of her face, except her eyes �during testimony against two male relatives in a sexual assault case in Ontario. The woman is the complainant in the case, and made the request to wear her niqab based on her Muslim beliefs.

The defendants, however, say they should be able to see the facial expressions of N.S. for the purpose of cross-examination.

A preliminary inquiry judge ordered that she remove her niqab before testifying, but an Ontario Superior Court judge later quashed that order.

Posted

Snobbery at it's best. :rolleyes:

Not at all... find me a left-wing paper with a pair of mega-bosoms on the 3rd page and I will also strike it down.

Now there's a serious implication of this issue where a woman tried to testify in court with her face covered and the Supreme Court heard arguments about that last year.

Yes, I agree on that one.

Posted

Snobbery at it's best. :rolleyes:

This was a stunt was done by the Menzoid. He does this kind of stuff all the time.

Now there's a serious implication of this issue where a woman tried to testify in court with her face covered and the Supreme Court heard arguments about that last year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/12/08/niqab-supreme-court-canada_n_1136295.html

Michael's always been about "approved" news. In other words, news that supports his political ideology.

Posted

Not at all... find me a left-wing paper with a pair of mega-bosoms on the 3rd page and I will also strike it down.

Well NOW Magazine a predominant left-wing Toronto magazine is notorious for showing prostitution ads, sorry escort ads. :rolleyes:

If you're that offended by the Sunshine Girls fine. But it doesn't mean the reporters and columnists are any less professional. Well David Menzies isn't terribly professional but it's his schick.

Posted

Michael's always been about "approved" news. In other words, news that supports his political ideology.

Yet, I like the Globe and Mail and hate The Star.

Sorry, Shady, but you're trying to retrofit an ideology on my choices where it doesn't fit. How many liberal papers do you enjoy, by the way ?

Posted

Give it up to the Toronto Sun for being the only news organization with the integrity to investigate.

the 14 year old went for 3/3 in buying liquor, not only was he not asked to remove his burka to be id, he wasn't even asked to show id.

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/24/lcbo-serves-underage-boy-wearing-burka-face-veil

TORONTO - Three liquor stores in the GTA recently sold booze to a 14-year-old boy whose identity was hidden because he was wearing a full-length burka and face veil at the time.

The teenager, clad in an Islamic female’s traditional garb of a burka, headscarf and facial covering, shopped in three different LCBO stores north of Toronto last Wednesday.

In each location, the Grade 8 student paid cash for a bottle of Sambuca liqueur.

Allow me to quote Adam Radwanski @aradwanski It's a disservice to the good reporters there that the Sun has basically become the equivalent of a message-board troll.

Posted

Well NOW Magazine a predominant left-wing Toronto magazine is notorious for showing prostitution ads, sorry escort ads. :rolleyes:

Yes, this newspaper is also known as a "rag". I don't put much faith in it.

If you're that offended by the Sunshine Girls fine. But it doesn't mean the reporters and columnists are any less professional. Well David Menzies isn't terribly professional but it's his schick.

Why do you think I'm offended ?

I assume the columnists are professional, because who would work for a rag like the Sun for free. I accept your assertion that Mr. Menzies may not be paid for his work.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...