JerrySeinfeld Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 And just because you say it's not right that makes it so? Two women raising a boy? C'mon. Quote
cybercoma Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 I would rather see two lesbians in a loving relationship raise a boy than you ever having any kids regardless of gender. Quote
JerrySeinfeld Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 I would rather see two lesbians in a loving relationship raise a boy than you ever having any kids regardless of gender. Just stop at the "I'd rather see two lesbians" and you'll be ok. Quote
BC_chick Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 (edited) No, that's wasn't me. Bullshit! I totally remember the thread and it didn't take long to find it. Women are less happy because they have followed the path of independence and profession over that of family, marriage, childeren and romantic connection - on the advice of "women's" leaders who are usually miserable man-hating lesbians with 8 cats. While it's a good thing that women have options and the freedom to choose their path in life, many are finding that choosing a profession over marriage and childeren is metaphorically spitting into a strong genetic wind; a genetic predisposition of women to seek out love, marriage, family, childeren and homemaking. If you thinkl I'm wrong just look at the ashen grey faces of the women who attend an offfice everyday. Then go to the local grocery store and see the glowing faces of the pregnant or new moms: they are where they want to be - whether they're willing to admit it or not. And You're funny Kimmy. But you gotta check out the grocery store on a Tuesday morning at 11am. It's completely different. It's slow paced and filled with a bunch of mommy's pushing strollers around leisurely whilst talking about their favourite yoga spot with friends. Maybe it's because I shop in Kitsilano. And the thread. Edited September 15, 2012 by BC_chick Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
sharkman Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 I would rather see two lesbians in a loving relationship raise a boy than you ever having any kids regardless of gender. Why, just because you say it's right that makes it so? With apologies to John Lennon, imagine there's no heaven. Imagine all things being just as you wish they would be. Do you really think that would make it all better? Come on... Quote
JerrySeinfeld Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 Bullshit! I totally remember the thread and it didn't take long to find it. And And the thread. So what? There is no inconsistency here; women ARE happiest as moms. And two lesbians raising a boy IS ridiculous. Where's the inconsistency? Quote
BC_chick Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 So what? There is no inconsistency here; women ARE happiest as moms. And two lesbians raising a boy IS ridiculous. Where's the inconsistency? The inconsistency is where you say above that women ARE happiest as moms, yet you say this about *lesbian* mothers: Lesbians shouldn't be parents. What an awful idea. Two women. Anyone knows that one bossy emotional prissy dumb control freak woman is enough for any household an any two people raising a kid. Can you imagine the poor kid who has to grow up under two women? ugh.Oh wait. One woman is "less" emotionally disturbed than the other. Yay. Two volatile emotional wing nuts without the steadying hand of a male role model. So what? Women are only happy as moms when there's a man in the house? Incredible. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
JerrySeinfeld Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 (edited) The inconsistency is where you say above that women ARE happiest as moms, yet you say this about *lesbian* mothers: So what? Women are only happy as moms when there's a man in the house? Incredible. Wow. we decided to completely ignore the child in this discussion, didn't we? This is quite common among feminists. Me me me me me. I I I I I. Screw the baby. Kill it. It's "health care". Certainly women are happy as moms. And I think I see where you are going with this: as long as the two lesbian moms are happy, who gives a shit about the kid, right? This is the basic premise of all feminists: I can kill a baby if it inconveniences me and call it "health care", and I can ruin a boy's life because I feel like being a lesbian parent. Me me me me me. Edited September 15, 2012 by JerrySeinfeld Quote
BC_chick Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 Wow. we decided to completely ignore the child in this discussion, didn't we? Certainly women are happy as moms. And I think I see where you are going with this: as long as the two lesbian moms are happy, who gives a shit about the kid, right? I'm really not concerned what you think of children raised in lesbian households because studies prove you wrong. I'm just pointing out how differently you describe mothers when discussing lesbian mothers vs. straight mothers. The former are hormonal, crazy, emotional nutjobs and the latter stroll through the grocery stores glowing and wearing yoga pants. You're a misogynist homophobe. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
JerrySeinfeld Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 (edited) I'm really not concerned what you think of children raised in lesbian households because studies prove you wrong. I'm just pointing out how differently you describe mothers when discussing lesbian mothers vs. straight mothers. The former are hormonal, crazy, emotional nutjobs and the latter stroll through the grocery stores glowing and wearing yoga pants. You're a misogynist homophobe. No, you had it wrong. Both are hormonal, crazy emotional nut jobs. One just happens to have a male as her counterpart to balance the kid's upbringing. Kids need a man in their life to provide structure and leadership. Women generally aren't equipped to teach boys about how to be a man. Why? because women don't know what it is to be a man. Women complain. Women demand. Women whine. Men do not. What kind of man is this kid gonna grow up to be if he has TWO people who constantly complain abobut how it's somebody else's fault that their life is so shitty? Women don't know how to teach a boy what every man needs to know: that nobody owes you anything. That the only thing you get in this world is what you EARN. Women don't understand this. Only women use the word DESERVE. There is no such word in a man's vocabulary. The poor boy is gonna grow up thinking he DESERVES things, because that's how women view the world. He will not be a man. Edited September 15, 2012 by JerrySeinfeld Quote
cybercoma Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 This kid is more of a man than you'll ever be. Quote
JerrySeinfeld Posted September 15, 2012 Report Posted September 15, 2012 This kid is more of a man than you'll ever be. Many lessons on the double dong, he's had. Quote
CANADIEN Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 So.... you're about 9 years old I gather? Don't insult 9-year olds, please Quote
CANADIEN Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 Me me me me me. Indeed... It's about you parading your ignorance, prejudice and cluelessness. May I suggest you grow up and become a man... You know, someone who doesn't spend his time trying to put down others to compensate for his own lack of common sense and humanity. Quote
bleeding heart Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 No, that's wasn't me. But it's not gayness that makes women emotional and irrational it's hormones. By the way, making a comment about someone doesn't make me afraid of them. I just happen to know that two women as parents is a bad situation for any young boy. Additionally, "misogynist" refers to hatred. I don't hate women. Just because I accurately describe how most women are irrational due to emotions isn't hatred. It's just fact. Like most arch-conservatives, you don't base any opinions on facts. You despise facts as much as the Creationists do. If your stated views on women in this thread are your actual opinions, you're a loser. If you're just spouting them to be a provocative little troll, then you're a douchebag. I'll let you decide for yourself. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
Guest American Woman Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 If your stated views on women in this thread are your actual opinions, you're a loser. If you're just spouting them to be a provocative little troll, then you're a douchebag. Either way, quite frankly, he's not worth the time or attention given him. Quote
CANADIEN Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 (edited) If what Jerry says about women is true, then kids should be raised by... male gay couples Edited September 16, 2012 by CANADIEN Quote
bleeding heart Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 If what herry says about women is true, then kids should be raised by... male gay couples I imagine he'd try to weasel out of this (perfectly logical) conclusion to his "thought" processes. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
Guest American Woman Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 If what Jerry says about women is true, then kids should be raised by... male gay couples Of course not. Men wouldn't be in their glory, grinning from ear to ear, whistling a happy tune while grocery shopping, cooking, cleaning, and doing the laundry. Kids need women in their lives for such things. Quote
bleeding heart Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 Of course not. Men wouldn't be in their glory, grinning from ear to ear, whistling a happy tune while grocery shopping, cooking, cleaning, and doing the laundry. Kids need women in their lives for such things. And women are specially suited for the Stepford Wives phenomenon; men are...too intelligent, evidently. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
Guest American Woman Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 And women are specially suited for the Stepford Wives phenomenon; men are...too intelligent, evidently. And unlike women, men also have their emotions in check. Quote
bleeding heart Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 And unlike women, men also have their emotions in check. I'd inform my wife of this fact, but she'd probably get so emotional that she'd irrationally disagree with me. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
-TSS- Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 I can see that you have fallen to the trap set up by the troll who abuses the name of a good comedian. Quote
bleeding heart Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 (edited) I can see that you have fallen to the trap set up by the troll who abuses the name of a good comedian. Not at all. If you're aware you're "debating" with a troll, and you don't let him or her (usually him, interestingly) rile you up...then you are not part of any grotesque Victory to which he may be striving. Now, many people say it's better all around to ignore trolls. Maybe they're right, I dunno. Both American woman and Cybercoma have recently offered me similar advice, and so I will take it seriously. But as for trapping me, no. Trolls are notoriously foolish, so aren't smart enough to do so. Edited September 16, 2012 by bleeding heart Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
CPCFTW Posted September 16, 2012 Report Posted September 16, 2012 No, you had it wrong. Both are hormonal, crazy emotional nut jobs. One just happens to have a male as her counterpart to balance the kid's upbringing. Kids need a man in their life to provide structure and leadership. Women generally aren't equipped to teach boys about how to be a man. Why? because women don't know what it is to be a man. Women complain. Women demand. Women whine. Men do not. What kind of man is this kid gonna grow up to be if he has TWO people who constantly complain abobut how it's somebody else's fault that their life is so shitty? Women don't know how to teach a boy what every man needs to know: that nobody owes you anything. That the only thing you get in this world is what you EARN. Women don't understand this. Only women use the word DESERVE. There is no such word in a man's vocabulary. The poor boy is gonna grow up thinking he DESERVES things, because that's how women view the world. He will not be a man. Great post. One thing I would add is that many men are becoming emotional nutjobs too. Just look at some of the posters on this thread. The feminist movement has claimed the manhood of many. If we were to tally up what all of these nutjobs "deserve", we'd probably have to harvest the entire solar system for enough resources to provide it to them. "me me me me" indeed. It is the mantra of most women and lefties. But, to be fair to women, there is a small minority of cold conservative women who aren't slaves to their hormones and emotions. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.