Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No, Israel wants their fevered, rabid clerics gone. The Persian people are just fine.

and the islamic world wants israels fevered, rabid zionist clerics gone. the jewish people are just fine...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

  • Replies 336
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

and most of the world is sick of hearing empty threats from iran

how many supporters does israel have at the UN 14?...14 most of the world? :lol: ...what most of the world is sick of is apartheid...a just solution for palestinians and all the issues disappear...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted (edited)

how many supporters does israel have at the UN 14?...14 most of the world? :lol: ...what most of the world is sick of is apartheid...a just solution for palestinians and all the issues disappear...

that doesn't mean they aren't sick of iran that just means they're sick of israel

they can be sick of both you know

How many allies does Iran have? less than 14 eh

I know I am sick of both of them

I don't support either of them but it seems you're siding with Iran

Edited by olp1fan
Posted

I suspect you haven't read many of my posts but that point applies equally to so-called allies as Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. I am tired of Israel, the country with the best human rights record in the area (albeit not perfect) being singled out.

And i suspect you haven't read many of my posts either. No body is singling out Israel. So please stop playing the victim card when the very own title of this thread makes Israel the aggressor. Admit that if it's Human rights issue there are many other places you could start with.

Posted

No, Israel wants their fevered, rabid clerics gone. The Persian people are just fine.

Thanks for confirming that Persians are fine. I guess you would have said the same thing about libyans, Iraqis, afghanis, etc etc etc before they got attacked. Does supporting israel for you justify an attack on any country in the region just because you don't like their government?

Posted (edited)

And how many Japanese would have died in a protracted land invasion tight blockade including food and medicine? But it's easy for you; if the West does it bad, if the East or some primitive group does it, good. Why not move to Pakistan?

The issue concerns application of nuclear weapon not siding with east or west. In this case west used it against a non nuclear country. Furthermore, japan was already literally at war with US by attacking it's navy. The creation of nuclear weapons and the tragedy of Japan in WW2 is a deterrent on all out war. The human race does not want nuclear weapon but we have them....

Coming back to the topic, speculation on Iran firing on Israel is just nonsense.

They are too close and Iran would suffer as well. US as part of a Global Alliance can put an end to this folly.

Edited by kactus
Posted

Hmm, looks like you are right. Ah well, can't blame him for saying what he thinks. At least it's not the double speak we usually get with our leaders.

We need to create an enemy. It diverts the sheeple's thinking away from the economic woes and puts the spot light on a contrived enemy of the people. Then the real enemies of the people can carry on robbing our money from us and continue to live in the style they really believe they deserve.

Posted

Thanks for confirming that Persians are fine. I guess you would have said the same thing about libyans, Iraqis, afghanis, etc etc etc before they got attacked. Does supporting israel for you justify an attack on any country in the region just because you don't like their government?

Interesting that your list does not include Israel, which has also been attacked....many times, including the Gulf War.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

You can not speak for 'we'. War plays no favorites and is not fair. It's not a violent sport.

Is that how you look at it, as a sport? I've seen a lot of crap posted by you, but that is pretty low.

It is politics by other means and woe be to those in the way. That's how it has been and will be no matter the 'rules'...no matter the children.

Status quo is acceptable. I'd like to change that.

BTW: The word is 'affect'...not 'effect'. Think of it this way: The effects affected you and you'll never get it wrong.

Ah yes, thanks for the English lesson Doggy ... I did save some of those treats for you. I think you deserved one , here you go.

Posted

Is that how you look at it, as a sport? I've seen a lot of crap posted by you, but that is pretty low.

Are you f**king blind now, too??

Status quo is acceptable. I'd like to change that.

You have zero clue who Von C is...Wikipedia is your friend.

Ah yes, thanks for the English lesson Doggy ... I did save some of those treats for you. I think you deserved one , here you go.

I'd hate for people to think you're an idiot who doesn't even know the difference between effect and affect.

Posted

Are you f**king blind now, too??

You are starting to come apart at the stitches here Doggy. Want another treat? Will that make you feel better?

You have zero clue who Von C is...Wikipedia is your friend.

As I said before, I don't have a clue who he is. So you are correct here. Is Wikipedia a good enough source?

I'd hate for people to think you're an idiot who doesn't even know the difference between effect and affect.

As we know it is a common mistake when using these two terms. I admitted I was wrong. But keep on hammering on it, because obviously that makes me look like the idiot. Have we not seen this type of thing from you a few times already?

Posted
You can not speak for 'we'. War plays no favorites and is not fair. It's not a violent sport.

Is that how you look at it, as a sport? I've seen a lot of crap posted by you, but that is pretty low.

Free reading comprehension lesson for you. Notice the bolded word. The "not" could apply to "violent" or "sport". Which do you think war is not? Not violent? Or not a sport?

To belabor what exactly DogOnPorch was saying: sports, even violent ones, have rules and are "fair" by some standard, in that teams/players compete on some kind of even playing field. War, on the other hand, not being a sport, is not "fair", and is not supposed to be "fair".

You can thank me later.

Posted

Free reading comprehension lesson for you. Notice the bolded word. The "not" could apply to "violent" or "sport". Which do you think war is not? Not violent? Or not a sport?

Ah I see where I made the error.

My apologies to DoP.

Posted
U.S. Plans Bomb Sales in Gulf to Counter Iran

WASHINGTON—The Obama administration has quietly drawn up plans to provide a key Persian Gulf ally with thousands of advanced "bunker-buster" bombs and other munitions, part of a stepped-up U.S. effort to build a regional coalition to counter Iran.

The proposed sale to the United Arab Emirates would vastly expand the existing capabilities of the country's air force to target fixed structures, which could include bunkers and tunnels—the kind of installations where Iran is believed to be developing weapons.

WSJ

war drums boom-boom-boom...

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

war drums boom-boom-boom...

Gee...reads like Canada buying lots of guided munitions for Libya. Everybody just take a number please and we will get your bombs to you as soon as possible. This is the busy holiday season after all.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

how many supporters does israel have at the UN 14?...14 most of the world? :lol: ...what most of the world is sick of is apartheid...a just solution for palestinians and all the issues disappear...

And if you had your way the Jews disappear with the issues. You are sick.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

yes, lets arm more countries in the middle east...this sure will end well

Anything to shut those retards over there up and get them to quit wasting the worlds time is a win at this point. Even if it means millions of square miles of glass.

We sat around and did nothing while Israel, India, and Pakistan and North Korea built nukes. Doesnt seem like anyone cares much anymore.

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted (edited)

And if you had your way the Jews disappear with the issues. You are sick.

If all youre going to do is cry racism every time someone is critical of Israel then why even participate?

Stop trying to pretend youre a victim when youre not.

Edited by dre

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted (edited)

Why should we disbelieve their words? Are you biting on the stereotype of Muslim fanatics, or secular Muslim leaders such as Saddam, as being liars as well as crazy? That is a bigoted, racist stereotype.

Hold it there....According to you there are reasons to implicate that Iran is going to attack Israel first and "wipe it off the map" (although this hasn't been explicitly said nor is there remotely any justification for Iran to do so when the consequences are fully known) and you say "why should we disbelieve their words?"

On the other hand, if the government of Iran tells us that they are acquiring nuclear capability for peaceful purposes then they are telling us a lie and we shouldn't believe them!

Who is being selective now?

Edited by kactus
Posted (edited)

Have you also read where this report says:

The report stops short, our correspondent adds, of saying explicitly that Iran is developing a nuclear bomb.

and then it goes to say....

Experts say Iran is at least one year away, perhaps several, from being able to produce a nuclear bomb.

Read my posts preceding this with JBG instead of indeed being selective.

Edited by kactus

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,908
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...