Jump to content

National Post: Harper No Fiscal Conservative


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That's generally true, but with reduced growth comes reduced growth in revenue. It isn't rocket science...it's economics :P.

Exactly. Some people just don't have a good grasp on economics, or logic for that matter. They continue to deny facts. Because facts are kryptonite to their arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but the key point is there's still growth. The amount of money coming into federal coffers still would've gone up. The money didn't drastically tail off.

No, but when you have a certain projection in spending increases, even just to keep up with inflation, and you have another projection of revenue increases....even a small change can result in billions of dollars one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

? Without the recession in the US, the projections worked. Yes, surpluses were to get smaller, and I don't really like that, but the budget was balanced.

No it wasn't. I remember to this day Flaherty announcing a small deficit of a billion dollars befoer the recession ripped everything apart.

Just because the recession was happening in the US doesn't mean that it had here. It also doesn't mean that they weren't burning through cash. In the January 27th, 2008 budget, Flaherty said Canada had run a small deficit of 1.1 billion over the year 2007. Considering the recession didn't start here until Q2 of 2008...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because the recession was happening in the US doesn't mean that it had here.

In every country on the globe.

As always.

In fact it hit even harder in Europe.

Edited by Saipan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it wasn't. I remember to this day Flaherty announcing a small deficit of a billion dollars befoer the recession ripped everything apart.

Canada didn't go into deficit until the very end of the 2008 - 2009 fiscal year. You're remembering thins incorrectly.

Edited by Smallc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harper wanted to model his party not after the PC party which tried to tackle Trudeau's deficit but instead wanted to model it after Ronald Reagan's party from 1980 onward which he was the one who created the largest deficit at the time and it only got worse until what you see right now which is a country on the verge of depression and being owned by China. I hope Canada seeks trade with other countries and gets away from being America's main trading partner. It would do us good in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fiscal conservatives have been extinct in North America for more than 30 years. The only meaningful attempts to balance spending with revenue in Canada since Iv been alive (Im 38) came during Paul Martins terms as finance minister.

Canadians want everything, but get upset when the bill comes in. We just went thru a world recession and we have only a 50 billion dollar debt, yes people ''only'' it is a drop in the bucket. Edited by PIK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canadians want everything, but get upset when the bill comes in. We just went thru a world recession and we have only a 50 billion dollar debt, yes people ''only'' it is a drop in the bucket.

But we were told by Slasher Jimmy that there would be no deficit and there was no recession?

Is the above a tacit admission that the fiscal guru's in the Conservative Party( :lol::lol::lol: ) were a little "off" on the thier economic predictions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we were told by Slasher Jimmy that there would be no deficit and there was no recession?

We were told by Jean The Hillside Strangler that if elected he'll kill the GST and NAFTA.

Then he fired Sheila Copps when she reminded him of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were told by Jean The Hillside Strangler that if elected he'll kill the GST and NAFTA.

Then he fired Sheila Copps when she reminded him of that.

Well the Liberals discovered that NAFTA and the GST were good policies and why would a government want to damage themselves to remove something they promised in a campaign. If it is something that benefits the country economically then I say keep it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...