William Ashley Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 (edited) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10748148 So north korea said they are going to use their nukes this weekend. Everyone have their weiners and marshmellows. I'm eating lots of PBJ sandwhiches to prepare. I should of went back home to nowhereville boreal forest ontario.. man instead I'm situated between two nuclear power generating facilities. *--* and the home of the next governor general of canada. Edited July 24, 2010 by William Ashley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 So north korea said they are going to use their nukes this weekend. Everyone have their weiners and marshmellows. I'm eating lots of PBJ sandwhiches to prepare. I should of went back home to nowhereville boreal forest ontario.. man instead I'm situated between two nuclear power generating facilities. *--* and the home of the next governor general of canada. Well..I suppose on the positive side...The fact that you're between two nuclear power plants means death will be most likely swift and relatively painless... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 North Korea's bomb = tiny. USA's bomb = huge. See pic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 According to news article, North Korea routinely threatens war when South Korea and the U.S. hold joint military drills, so it sounds as if they just upped the threat this time around since the threat of war obviously hasn't had the desired effects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 24, 2010 Report Share Posted July 24, 2010 Pretty much, AW. Baby wants bottle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alta4ever Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 I wonder what his reaction would have been, had he lived during the cuban missile crisis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borg Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Never doubt the screeching of a mad man - sooner or later he might act - it will not be pretty Borg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Never doubt the screeching of a mad man - sooner or later he might act - it will not be pretty Borg I'll be watchin' you!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borg Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 I'll be watchin' you!!! LOL! It is very relaxing to howl at the moon - especially when others twist over it Borg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Well, I haven't been bombed into oblivion yet. Maybe today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 I wonder what Obama's response would be if crazy kim actually detonated a bomb on US soil. Somehow I don't think it would be to respond in kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 I wonder what Obama's response would be if crazy kim actually detonated a bomb on US soil. Somehow I don't think it would be to respond in kind. That's what Japan thought too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Ah, but Japan didn't have nukes, and it wasn't Obama, and it was a far different time. 60 years ago any president elected would respond with a 'big stick'. Today the Dems have moved so far to the left that the original ones are rolling in their graves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Ah, but Japan didn't have nukes, and it wasn't Obama, and it was a far different time. 60 years ago any president elected would respond with a 'big stick'. Today the Dems have moved so far to the left that the original ones are rolling in their graves. First, you stated bomb on US soil, not nuclear bomb. Clearly the US would not hesitate to detonate a conventional "bomb" (HE warhead) in the DPRK in response. As for escalation to a nuclear attack, President Obama has recently modified US policy of calculated ambiguity to exclude a nuclear response to chemical and biological attack, expressly preserving that option for nuclear / radiological attack on the USA or allies. http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/2489080/posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 That's kind of scary. So if the US gets VX'ed or Variola'ed, what's the response again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 That's kind of scary. So if the US gets VX'ed or Variola'ed, what's the response again? Body bags and funerals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 That's kind of scary. So if the US gets VX'ed or Variola'ed, what's the response again? Viagra cannons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Okay, I thought it was assumed it would be a nuke since that's what crazy kim is talking about. And as to your point on US policy, I'm not talking about that, but about Obama the man. The man who would order a nuke to be detonated over a city full of human beings. I don't think Obama could do that, even if a city in the US is leveled by one. Do you actually think he could? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 (edited) Body bags and funerals. It would seem. A smallpox attack on the US has far greater potential to kill millions than a North Korean atomic warhead. Edited July 25, 2010 by DogOnPorch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Okay, I thought it was assumed it would be a nuke since that's what crazy kim is talking about. Kim can do a lot more damage to Seoul with garden variety artillery....and lots of it. And as to your point on US policy, I'm not talking about that, but about Obama the man. The man who would order a nuke to be detonated over a city full of human beings. I don't think Obama could do that, even if a city in the US is leveled by one. Do you actually think he could? Not only could he, but he would do so under existing policy...his own. No president can afford the practical or political ramifications of being weak on such a scenario, and allies living under the "nuclear umbrella" would also object. Also, the American National Command Authority includes other elements besides the sitting president, for obvious reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 It would seem. A smallpox attack on the US has far greater potential to kill millions than a North Korean atomic warhead. Not to worry....Obama will only be around for a few years....nukes are forever! LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 (edited) Not to worry....Obama will only be around for a few years....nukes are forever! LOL! Apparently large stockpiles of weaponized variola still exist at Vozrozhdeniya Island (no longer an island) and is quite poorly guarded. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vozrozhdeniya_Island I've always thought that's a bit of bad news... Edited July 25, 2010 by DogOnPorch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 Not only could he, but he would do so under existing policy...his own. No president can afford the practical or political ramifications of being weak on such a scenario, and allies living under the "nuclear umbrella" would also object. Also, the American National Command Authority includes other elements besides the sitting president, for obvious reasons. Nah, he's too much of a liberal wuss to make such a tough decision costing the death of a city full of people. He's much better at making decisions costing trillions of dollars. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 25, 2010 Report Share Posted July 25, 2010 ....I've always thought that's a bit of bad news... Haven't you heard? "WMD" is just more American propaganda....and it's not so bad to die like a sprayed roach! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.