Jump to content

Visible Minorities to be majority in 25 years


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 360
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Immigrants destroyed the World Trade Center. Violent crime and economic disparity are staggering in the United States, compared to other Western nations. I would hardly say their idea of complete integration into the loneliness of a culture that values individuality over community, and independence over social welfare, has been a glowing success.

I wouldn't call Jane/Finch or St. James Town paradise either, and let's not forget about Air India or the Toronto 18.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were not American citizens, making them immigrants.

Incorrect. A visa allows someone to visit. Tourists from some countries need visas....immigrants get green cards and have much more freedom...can work and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No...as the United States has a large domestic Hispanic population of about 46 million, second only to Mexico in the entire world. About 60% of the origin is from Mexico, not all Spanish speaking growth.

The United States has a larger Hispanic population than Canada has a Canadian population. Edited by cybercoma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incorrect. A visa allows someone to visit. Tourists from some countries need visas....immigrants get green cards and have much more freedom...can work and such.

Maybe I have bad information, but they were taking classes in the United States and living there. If they were "just visiting", then we're splitting hairs about the definition of an immigrant. In the context of Argus's opening post, either way, they are undesirable foreigners.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I have bad information, but they were taking classes in the United States and living there. If they were "just visiting", then we're splitting hairs about the definition of an immigrant. In the context of Argus's opening post, either way, they are undesirable foreigners.

Yes you can have a student visa...immigrants tend stay in their adopted land....student visa types go back home...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess that's all you can come up with when faced with uncomfortable facts.

No, I like uncomfortable facts...let me know when you stumble on one. Meanwhile the boring mindless drivel you might refer to as your posts merit Dagwood snoring....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I like uncomfortable facts...let me know when you stumble on one. Meanwhile the boring mindless drivel you might refer to as your posts merit Dagwood snoring....

I've already pointed out facts:

1) The white population is declining in all countries with white majorities (must not call them white countries even though it's ok to call black countries black, asian countries asian or muslim countries muslim).

2) Black people are treating white people worse in black countries than vice versa. Nearly a million white people have left South Africa due to safety concerns and most have already been driven out of Zimbabwe while on the other hand, the president of the US is half black, and countries with white majorities are helping people in Haiti.

3) Countries with white majorities are taking in large numbers of non-whites, but non-white countries remain virtually homogeneous. How many non-japanese are in Japan (second largest economy in the world)? How many non-chinese is China taking in (with its red hot economy)?

4) In the Middle East, people face persecution if they're not Muslims. It is a crime simply to enter Mecca if you're not a Muslim. There are thousands of mosques in non-Muslim countries, but how many churches are there in Saudi Arabia?

These are irrefutable facts and that is why you brush them off instead of debating it.

Some black people actually believe that the west manipulated the weather to create the earthquake in Haiti:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaaGsiRopGU&feature=response_watch

Here's a black man on C-SPAN calling for the extermination of white people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0&feature=related

Edited by justme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've already pointed out facts:

1) The white population is declining in all countries with white majorities (must not call them white countries even though it's ok to call black countries black, asian countries asian or muslim countries muslim).

Is the white population declining, or is the "foreign" population increasing? They're two different things after all. Regardless, this implies there's a problem with foreign people coming to the country, which you haven't proven.

2) Black people are treating white people worse in black countries than vice versa. Nearly a million white people have left South Africa due to safety concerns and most have already been driven out of Zimbabwe while on the other hand, the president of the US is half black, and countries with white majorities are helping people in Haiti.

Wow.
3) Countries with white majorities are taking in large numbers of non-whites, but non-white countries remain virtually homogeneous. How many non-japanese are in Japan (second largest economy in the world)? How many non-chinese is China taking in (with its red hot economy)?

4) In the Middle East, people face persecution if they're not Muslims. It is a crime simply to enter Mecca if you're not a Muslim. There are thousands of mosques in non-Muslim countries, but how many churches are there in Saudi Arabia?

Maybe that's why they're coming here. Is that the standard you aspire to for Canada?

These are irrefutable facts and that is why you brush them off instead of debating it.

These are nothing more than opinionated assumptions. You have not drawn out an argument, instead you point to certain "facts" and believe that they show something that you haven't made explicit--probably so you can weasel your way out of those assumptions when you're called on them.

Some black people actually believe that the west manipulated the weather to create the earthquake in Haiti:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaaGsiRopGU&feature=response_watch

Tin foil hat wearing idiots come in all colours. Does that mean they represent the entire population?

Here's a black man on C-SPAN calling for the extermination of white people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0&feature=related

Do I really need to dig up videos of whites calling for the extermination of all black people, jews, homosexuals, and just about everyone else? Once again... particular idiots are not indicative of entire groups.

Edited by cybercoma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've already pointed out facts:

1) The white population is declining in all countries with white majorities (must not call them white countries even though it's ok to call black countries black, asian countries asian or muslim countries muslim).

2) Black people are treating white people worse in black countries than vice versa. Nearly a million white people have left South Africa due to safety concerns and most have already been driven out of Zimbabwe while on the other hand, the president of the US is half black, and countries with white majorities are helping people in Haiti.

3) Countries with white majorities are taking in large numbers of non-whites, but non-white countries remain virtually homogeneous. How many non-japanese are in Japan (second largest economy in the world)? How many non-chinese is China taking in (with its red hot economy)?

4) In the Middle East, people face persecution if they're not Muslims. It is a crime simply to enter Mecca if you're not a Muslim. There are thousands of mosques in non-Muslim countries, but how many churches are there in Saudi Arabia?

These are irrefutable facts and that is why you brush them off instead of debating it.

Some black people actually believe that the west manipulated the weather to create the earthquake in Haiti:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaaGsiRopGU&feature=response_watch

Here's a black man on C-SPAN calling for the extermination of white people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0&feature=related

Holey league of lictor wannabes!!

Of course there are nit refutable facts...hell, they aren't even facts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, the Japanese and Chinese governments do not ask ethnicity related questions in their censuses. Instead, they ask people their nationality, that is what nation-state they are from. What that means is naturalized citizens, for example, would classify themselves as Japanese, even though they are not ethnically Japanese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the white population declining, or is the "foreign" population increasing? They're two different things after all. Regardless, this implies there's a problem with foreign people coming to the country, which you haven't proven.

Wow.

Maybe that's why they're coming here. Is that the standard you aspire to for Canada?

These are nothing more than opinionated assumptions. You have not drawn out an argument, instead you point to certain "facts" and believe that they show something that you haven't made explicit--probably so you can weasel your way out of those assumptions when you're called on them.

Tin foil hat wearing idiots come in all colours. Does that mean they represent the entire population?

Do I really need to dig up videos of whites calling for the extermination of all black people, jews, homosexuals, and just about everyone else? Once again... particular idiots are not indicative of entire groups.

Shame on you... you wrote what I was about to write, and even better.

JustMe... If those things are so wrong when happening elsewhere (and they are), why do you want them to happen here?

Edited by CANADIEN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The number of immigrants is a problem... Yet, there more immigrants coming to Canada on a yearly basis in the early 1910's and in the mid-1950's than now...

Projections from Statistics Canada are that by 2031 between 25% and 28% of the population might be foreign-born. The percentage was 22% between 1911 and 1931... And 28% is not a majority.

Some will say "but immigrants from today are not the same as immigrants from them". Yet each generation of immigrant are meet with the same bigotry, generalization and misconceptions. The same things said about Afghan immigrants today were said about those from Italy 90 years ago...

Whether or not we are admitting more immigrants that we can absorb, or whether or not we are carful enough about which INDIVIDUALS we let hi would be a worthy debate... if it was not hijacked by bigots and racists (amd no, I do not equate opposition to the current immigration policies with bigotry and racism).

Edited by CANADIEN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not we are admitting more immigrants that we can absorb, or whether or not we are carful enough about which INDIVIDUALS we let hi would be a worthy debate... if it was not hijacked by bigots and racists (amd no, I do not equate opposition to the current immigration policies with bigotry and racism).

the moment the thread was labelled "VISIBLE minority" it became bigoted and racist...it was no longer about the qualities the immigrants could bring or potential economic problems/benefits it was all about colour, religion and ethnicity...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the moment the thread was labelled "VISIBLE minority" it became bigoted and racist...it was no longer about the qualities the immigrants could bring or potential economic problems/benefits it was all about colour, religion and ethnicity...

Damn bigoted racist CBC.

About one-third of Canada's population — up to 14.4 million people — will be a visible minority by 2031, Statistics Canada projects.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/03/09/statscan-minority.html

Visible Minority...a Canadian term...no, Saudi Arabia doesn't use it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_minority

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBC or Globe and Mail never made it a racist issue by questioning wisdom of letting Visible immigrants into the country unlike the forum members here...

I bet they pull the wings off of flies and kick over small children's sand castles...the bastards.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...