wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 But Gregor Mendel is. mendel knew less than the average grade 12 student does today...try be relevant with knowledge using the knowledge of someone who has been dead over 100 yrs is no longer valid...it does give a clue as to how many decades it's been since you last went to school, 40? 50 yrs?.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 mendel knew less than the average grade 12 student does today...try be relevant with knowledge using the knowledge of someone who has been dead over 100 yrs is no longer valid...it does give a clue as to how many decades it's been since you last went to school, 40? 50 yrs?.. Mendal was right, none-the-less. You really have issues re: anger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 In the near future there will be a minority of whites. When that happens all white people can claim that they are in a minority group and get the benefits all others do. I doubt the status would be given even if proven true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 You should have gotten a visit to the farm so you'd know that if you breed black labs with black labs you get - black labs, while if you breed chocolate labs with chocolate labs you get ... a chocolate lab. it's the same dog, are you claiming they are different races of dogs? Likewise if you breed an African with an African you will probably get a person with familiar and distinctive racial features which will not include fair skin, blonde or red hair, or blue eyes.Would it make you feel better if we called white people a golden breed, and blacks the cholate breed? wow there's a sterotypical racist belief...typical africans skin colour varies from white and light olive to black and every shade in between...red hair yes you'll find that in africa as well...blue eyes, only been around for about 10,000 yrs, before that we're all brown, can it be we're all the same? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 I just want to be on record I prefer the minorities retain their visability especially while driving a night. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 (edited) Mendal was right, none-the-less. You really have issues re: anger. mendal knew very little...he and Darwin were the starting point for attempting to explain racist beliefs on science, Hitler continued on that theme with eugenics was he right too?...try get your science knowledge into the 21st century...you really have issues re: racism/ignorance. Edited March 15, 2010 by wyly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 mendal knew very little...he and Darwin were the starting point for attempting to explain racist beliefs on science, Hitler continued on that theme with eugenics was he right too?...try get you science knowledge into the 21st century... you really have issues re: racism/ignorance. Well you sure like calling folks racist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 (edited) Well you sure like calling folks racist. holding racists beliefs makes you? a) racist B -scientifically illiterate c) both of the above you get to decide which holds true for you...or you can choose to upgrade your scientific knowledge into the 21st century...and choose option d)enlightened Edited March 15, 2010 by wyly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 See...there you go again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 See...there you go again. so you don't deny it...which is as I thought... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 so you don't deny it...which is as I thought... And again...you're just not happy unless you can call someone names. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted March 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 (edited) it's the same dog, are you claiming they are different races of dogs? Dogs don't have races they have breeds. And those breeds have distinctive features, and often dispositions and personalities as well. As i said, we can call Africans the Black Breed if you want, then call Hispanics the Chocolate breed, and I guess Asians could be the golden breed while we whites would be the vanilla breed. wow there's a sterotypical racist belief...typical africans skin colour varies from white and light olive to black and every shade in between...red hair yes you'll find that in africa as well...blue eyes, only been around for about 10,000 yrs, before that we're all brown, can it be we're all the same? So you feel that because one out of every milion or so Africans (excluding European colonists and their descendants) has red hair or blonde hair, this invalidates the fact that all the rest have black hair? Blue eyed Africans According to this doctor of genetics blue eyes in Africans is pretty rare and usually the result of someone white in the ancestral closet, or some kind of mutation. Edited March 15, 2010 by Argus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 (edited) Dogs don't have races they have breeds. And those breeds have distinctive features, and often dispositions and personalities as well. As i said, we can call Africans the Black Breed if you want, then call Hispanics the Chocolate breed, and I guess Asians could be the golden breed while we whites would be the vanilla breed. a dog is a dog, is a wolf...all the same animal,a lab is the same animal as a poodle.... humans are all the same as well, hair and skin colour are as irrelevant as the types of teeth...So you feel that because one out of every milion or so Africans (excluding European colonists and their descendants) has red hair or blonde hair, this invalidates the fact that all the rest have black hair? the red hair gene is found everywhere this validates we all share a common ancestry Edited March 15, 2010 by wyly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted March 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 a dog is a dog, is a wolf...all the same animal, So to you, a miniature dacschund is the same animal as a timber wolf? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 So to you, a miniature dacschund is the same animal as a timber wolf? yup, no difference, same specie...what you're implying is short people nice person is a different specie as a tall grumpy person... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 And again...you're just not happy unless you can call someone names. when it holds true it's not calling names, and you don't deny it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 when it holds true it's not calling names, and you don't deny it... You're the one crying racism where none exists, bonehead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 You're the one crying racism where none exists, bonehead. you have racist beliefs that you claim are supported by science and they are not...bonehead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 you have racist beliefs that you claim are supported by science and they are not...bonehead Oh yeah? Like what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Oh yeah? Like what? read the thread... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 read the thread... Didn't think so...loser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TrueMetis Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 (edited) mendal knew very little...he and Darwin were the starting point for attempting to explain racist beliefs on science, Hitler continued on that theme with eugenics was he right too?...try get your science knowledge into the 21st century... you really have issues re: racism/ignorance. You know absolutely nothing about Darwin if you think what he did was anything like eugenics. Calling Darwin a racist is like calling Stalin a kind and gentle man. It doesn't fit at all with what the person was actually like. Edited March 16, 2010 by TrueMetis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 (edited) You know absolutely nothing about Darwin if you think what he did was anything like eugenics. Calling Darwin a racists is like calling Stalin a kind and gentle man. It doesn't fit at all with what the person was actually like. Interesting too that Gregor Mendel's findings back in the 1800s are thought to be racist by wyle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_inheritance Edited March 16, 2010 by DogOnPorch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Perhaps so. But the actual statements are factually correct. Anything can be correct if I decide that all terms used are subjective and decided by me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyly Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 (edited) You know absolutely nothing about Darwin if you think what he did was anything like eugenics. Calling Darwin a racist is like calling Stalin a kind and gentle man. It doesn't fit at all with what the person was actually like. poorly worded post on my part...I never meant to imply Darwin was a racist(he might have been I don't know)...what I meant was from his work others attempted to justify racial differences through science...eugenics was a direct result of Darwins work, Hitler fully supported evolution and used it to justify racial injustices... Edited March 16, 2010 by wyly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.