Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The presence of Sara Palin on the political landscape is more of a signifier of the decline of politics than anything else.

Oh pshaw or Mr. Hardner, politics in general, not just American, is rife with such light weights...quayle? Dion? Fry?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

....Firstly, they need to overhaul the machinery of government completely. The corruption that is rampant in the system needs to be jettisoned somehow. Campaigns cost too much money, and the system suffers from that. I would start there.

Sure..."they" will get right on that just as soon as the corrupt and dysfunctional circus in Canada does the same.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Sure..."they" will get right on that just as soon as the corrupt and dysfunctional circus in Canada does the same.

Corrupt, LOL

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Canada has its own set of problems. I was responding to a question about the US, so don't start shootin' yer guns at the ceilin' in indignation now, B_C.

Bullocks...the "machinery" of US government just ruled that the limitations you seek are unconstitutional. The "problems" are by design, whether you agree or not. Shoot your guns at that.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Bullocks...the "machinery" of US government just ruled that the limitations you seek are unconstitutional. The "problems" are by design, whether you agree or not. Shoot your guns at that.

Yes, the system is designed to expand forever.

There's nothing stopping the parties from agreeing to audited limits.

Bullocks ? What ? Blimey ?

Posted

Yes, the system is designed to expand forever.

There's nothing stopping the parties from agreeing to audited limits.

Voluntary limitations are already in place.....these are optional....and must always remain so or the "system" will strike them down.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Then the system will eat itself. Limits need to be imposed or the two behemoths will destroy themselves in trying to beat each other.

Nope...please widen your time horizon...parties come and go...the "system" remains.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

The system is the parties... there are only two of them that count, you know.

No...we count them all...each election...like clockwork. Always more than two.....just ask Jesse Ventura.

The republic is older than either two major parties.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

No...we count them all...each election...like clockwork. Always more than two.....just ask Jesse Ventura.

The republic is older than either two major parties.

Yes, and the consequences of the Hot Air Balloon party, or the Free Silver party being there are null. Yet one of them will rise up eventually as the two fat cat parties can't keep feeding the campaign funding monster forever.

Posted

Yes, and the consequences of the Hot Air Balloon party, or the Free Silver party being there are null. Yet one of them will rise up eventually as the two fat cat parties can't keep feeding the campaign funding monster forever.

What's important is the continued funding, not which parties the funding goes to. Some spend millions only to fail...it is all part of the game. And it is very American.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

What's important is the continued funding, not which parties the funding goes to. Some spend millions only to fail...it is all part of the game. And it is very American.

Not sure what that means, but... at some point somebody is going to realize that the whole gong show that is American politics needs to be separated from the entertainment industry and its attendant graft. The first 3rd party that manages to do that properly will see some traction for it.

The system doesn't need money any more than a 400 pound person needs a burger - and I'm sure you can look out the window right now and see one walking into a Burger King without much problem. Please don't scream that that person has the right to their triple beef Whopper, B_C, because I already know that they do.

Blam ! Blam ! Blam !

Posted

Not sure what that means, but... at some point somebody is going to realize that the whole gong show that is American politics needs to be separated from the entertainment industry and its attendant graft. The first 3rd party that manages to do that properly will see some traction for it.

No, they will become part of the same "industry". Politics is a product, just like anything else.

The system doesn't need money any more than a 400 pound person needs a burger - and I'm sure you can look out the window right now and see one walking into a Burger King without much problem. Please don't scream that that person has the right to their triple beef Whopper, B_C, because I already know that they do.

Actually, my first thought was how many Burger Kings there are in Canada....but at present....no sitting Parliament....ironic indeed. LOL!

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

We eat the much healthier diet of poutine, hog fat donuts and 5% beer.

It's good to know that even if you can't count on your "gong show" government, you can always count on American corporatism and franchise opportunities. Want fries with that?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Yes...but as always...the "Gong Show" reference is American....all is well.

I love the fact that you're just dim enough to think you have a point. :lol:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

How's that Palin is irrelevant thing workin out for you? :lol:

She's as irrelevant as ever. Though there is a push for her to run in 2012, that's just because it's safe to say she will remain as irrelevant as John Kerry by losing.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

How's that Palin is irrelevant thing workin out for you? :lol:

You said it yourself

Your thread title is disingenuous. Palin isn't a leading Republican. She's a private citizen, holding no public office.

It's good to know that even if you can't count on your "gong show" government, you can always count on American corporatism and franchise opportunities. Want fries with that?

Only if they are French.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...