GostHacked

Has any religion played a role in 'numerals' ??? Has Christianity or Catholicism drummed up any numbers for us as of late??? I pick on this for it is an ill thought process. Radical 'insert religion here' is dangerous in any case. There are fundamentalists on all sides. And they are all just as violent. Some use armiies to invade, some use small tactical groups to invade. No one seems to talk about extreme fundamentalist Christianity.

Interesting stuff. So the CBC used a photo of a plant that no longer exists to further the global warming effort. That boggles my mind. For someone like me who is not that familiar with the area and to have this pointed out to me makes me angry. This is deliberate misleading and misrepresentation of the the whole thing. Nevermind the photoshop, the fact that a pic (even cropped) that shows a plant no longer in existance shows they are disingenuous in their efforts.

Since when am I required to take orders from you ? Are you another all knowing all seeing type of poster like some others on this thread ? Should your word be accepted as gospel ? If you want respect you have to earn it or threaten people who can't defend themselves to get it. Lets see if you can add something to this thread besides attacking me all the time. You are not required to take orders from me. You are not even required to reply to my reply. If you want respect, you simply have to earn it. The moment you threaten someone, you can no longer get the respect you want. From anyone. EDIT LE. And if you want respect, calling others names is not going to help, eventhough they all call you names. You are taking it out of context. I told you in the other thread : If you want to really convince people that 9/11 was an inside job, you will need to change your tactics. So you are using the same ones and still not making ANY headway at all. So go ahead and keep smackin the heads against the wall. I have tried to add to the thread, but you even go on about how you do not deal in theories and shit like that. I had proposed a couple theories on how the money went missing and how big corporations had a play in it. Large monopolistic companies. That was in your 130 page thread. That was something new to offer. Yet you do not deal in probabilities and theories and went back to WTC7.... Another reason I may not have had anything else to contribute to the threads, is that, hell there is already pages of it there. I do not feel the need to reiterate the same stuff over and over again. You know it works for the Right and those in charge. Say A, eventhough B happened, enough and often and people will beleive it. Wake them up this way. Say, A is A regardless. Say it once. Say it with conviction. Then let that sit in their brains. Then let them start asking the questions and let them wake up on their own. YES I believe it was brought down by demolition. It simply looks like one. And I agree that WTC7 is a major key in showing the attacks were LIHOP or MIHOP. Now you need more than just WTC 7 for 100 pages. Globalists this, Alex Jones that. Professors this, engineers that. Tune back in later. Same stuff. only 100 more pages of it. Another EDIT LE All you have done is get after me in these threads. If you have something positive to add then add it, but if all you want to do is criticise me then I'm not so sure your criticisms are well founded and I don't want to work with someone when all they do is criticise.

Thats why when you ask if we can work togather my answer is a definitive NO. And now you have your reason why no one will support you. I told you to change your tactics. It is plainly not working here OR in the 130+ pages of the other thread. I am not sure if repeating the same shit over and over again will help, for anyone can just read a few pages of the thread and realize this and the other one will result in nothing you want to achieve. Fine then Polynewbie. I have tried to help you in the past. No more nice nice from me then. I was willing to help and we could come up with much much more.. you know I AM A TRUTHIE TOO RIGHT???? But I guess now I see there are different levels and kinds of truthies. If you all want this to stop. Just do not reply anymore. Polynewbie has not offered anything new in weeks. So come back in another year to read 100 more pages of dialogue that does not progress the argument of the inside job. I think rehashing the lines over and over again is against forum rules. But I am not sure. I am a truthie and support most of what PolYnewbie says. See how many times I have responded to compared to many of the others who for what it seem like, they are not truthies. Just an observation.

No, you failed to understand that threats to the US and its interests are one and the same. Why did Canadians attack and sanction Iraq? Did Iraq threaten Canada? Did Serbs threaten Canada? Did Afghans threaten Canada? Did Haitians threaten Canada? I did not support those wars either. But there should be a clear distinction between the two. People will be able to put that more into context than to just be told what it is. A clear distintiction between a imminent threat the HOME, or a threat to HOME's interests. An interest is something we want from someone else. If that means forcing your will upon them and take it as it was your own, resulting in down right theft. Not to mention terrorism . Now, I understand that friendly deals between countries can result in HOME having to defend FRIEND's territory in exchange for security. That also can lead to abuse by the Head of the HOME to take advantage of FRIEND's obvious weekness. Now these interests you speak of, are the same interests the Enemy has. So, both are doing it under a guise of WE ARE MIGHTY STRONG FREE PROUD(in the name of love some god), ect. And slander the other publicly and so relentlessly that the public that is targeted is beaten into submission and will support whatever cause they have been brainwashed into believing. These interests are natural resources, such as oil and even fresh water. Prepare for the long war. Stock up now!

bush_cheney2004 Well the thing you were trying to get at was how much of a threat Iraq was to the United States. The list you showed did not have the US. So it is more of a threat to United States 'interests' and not a threat to the US itself. So there is a big difference. You failed to see that. B.Max However the two were exclusive to each other. Nine Eleven was a terrorist act, that I can 100% agree on. But did Iraq have anything to do with it? It has been proven that there were NO links between Al-Queada (you know,,those guys that claimed they did it?) and Iraq. Correct me please if I am wrong, but I did not see one Iraqi name among those terrorists who committed 9/11. Most of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Someone should have let the Republicans in on this important information. They might have just said NO to the war. Saddam was not even a threat back in the 80's. He was the US's Middle East Bastard. The US played a part in the Iraq-Iran war. Good chance they fueled it (no I cannot prove it yet) through the Shah and other tactics. Saddam was not a threat in the 80's and he was not a threat to the United States at anytime.

True shootings would not happen. However contact physical attacks, I suspect would skyrocket. Violent people are still violent people, with a gun or without a gun. What needs to be done is better education on gun saftey, and much more strict screening process for aquiring a gun of any type. When anyone can walk in to get a gun and many with criminal records already, the problem is not gun control but the type of person who has access to it. My father has been a gun owner for as long as I have been alive. All of them registered (I think), all locked up in a cabinet. The ammo is locked in a smaller box inside the cabinet. There are trigger locks on each gun. I had helped my dad clean the guns after he had come home from a hunting trip. I had picked up the barrel of one gun (he had already made sure they all were unloaded) it was a shot gun, so the barrel was exposed on both ends (if you know how shotguns work) I picked it up and looked into the barrel from the other end. I got a 'PUT THAT DOWN NOW' and a smack on the head. I have never ever ever looked into a barrel of a gun again without checking the chamber at least 3 times. You can say my dad knocked some sense into me. My dad is a very saftey orientated person. Health and Saftey rep at his work and even is Mr. Saftey in and around the house. Education on safe use of firearms is essential. More strict screening on who can own a gun. Because of this thread, I am, now considering purchasing a firearm of some type. I have yet to own one up untill this point.

Giving the legitimate hunting enthusiast the capability to murder.... Is this the way you wanted to word it? It is not the legitimate hunting enthusiast that is to blame here. An unstable mind with a gun in hand is the issue. I agree with AndrewL on this matter. Also remember prohobition of alcohol back in the early part of the 20th century? Did that stop it? No. Did people still drink? Yes. Will the same results happen for prohobition on guns? 100% yes. Practice gun saftey, and practice, and practice. Stable minds don't go shooting others.

Kuwait Oman Qatar Kurds "Marsh" Arabs Israel Jordan ...see UNSCOM and IAEA for the "how". I don't see United States anywhere in that list. However, I do see some United States 'interests' in that list. Big difference.

On top of the 130 plus in that other thread. For some reason this was the only post that was worth replying to at all. OH and reading the plane stall thing. There is not much of a chance of a plane that large stalling while at such high speeds with not much of an angle of attack. When a plane stalls, and one that large, it would be near impossible to recover the plane in time if you were less than 5000 feet. Very hard to kick around a few hundred tonnes of plane when not being able to generate any lift, therefore no controls. EDIT LE - And to recover, you need to point that baby at the ground to start generating lift again and to have any control whatsoever of the craft. It would look more like a spiral dive that the pilot made. Those are a bitch to get out of. So I'd say there was no stalling involved. He did not hesistate and crashed the plane. I am so going to hell.

How many varieties of sustainable edible plant life is self pollinatiting or hermaphroditic naturaly in nature?

When I was in my early 20s I was quite fond of the right. As I've gotten older I've drifted left. While your observations may be accurate of a trend, they are certainly not absolute. I have found myself drifting the same way. Eventhought I could be considered a Liberal by upbringing. My parents always voted NDP. I have always considered myself a socialist as well. Not sure how that is going to play out in this post yet. How about this. Maybe being a Liberal and a Conservative are not at all different. Both groups want to spend less money on something and more on another. In my view, the Conservatives don't want to spend money on socialist type programs like national health care but yet have no problem with spending millions and billions on a large and mostly unneeded military and policing units. As the Liberals would like to spend less on the military and more on socialist programs like national health care. Hmm national health care for all seems like a great idea. I think many would rather have more doctors than generals. I have a problem with the 'growing up' part. With my experiences in life, I have gone the other way. I was center-right if you will. Now I am difinitively on the left. Me and stignasty may be in the minority on this, but that in itself would make an interesting poll. Political stand point from a young age to an old age. Compare how often shifts happen, when in life is it happening, and will it shift again? Also would be a good add on for that poll is to ask what happened in order to affect your thinking.

ScottSA Check out where most of your latest modern electronics come from. Where are they manufactured? I think China is quite up to speed with the modern technology. And since it is cheaper to have these high tech units built in China, it would seem to me that it wont take long for China to become great in technology and economics in their own right. With the Corporate West looking to turn a profit anywhere they can, if it means outsourcing your labour force to other countries, then it will be done. Is that what Globalization is??

I don't see how the DEMS are at fault here. The Democrats did not approve of the 2003 tax cuts. The senate and congress was by majority, Republican. The Dems are saying the tax cuts BUSH made, may need to expire. There was a double whammy here. Tax cuts, then War on Terror. People are paying less tax to the government on top of the current administration spending money like there is no tomorrow to fight this new war on Terror.. So that is a double shot of goodness the Democrats are to blame for. Ugh.

Sharkman. You know this is going to come back and bite you in the ass. I hope you read the whole thread before making yourself look foolish. Just some advice. If you had watched all the videos I had linked, you would know that it was not taken out of context. yeah he does quite a bit, pay attention. For the most part, yes. Bill slanders quite a bit. Most people who are on the air slander others. Just nobody notices it much anymore for the airwaves are stocked full of this rhetoric from BOTH sides.

And I think all sheep that blindly follow the leader's word (eventhough deep down inside you are against what he says but yet you follow anyways) should be shaved and put out in the cold. If there were no dissenters, you may never know the actual truth. Or maybe not even have an idea that the truth is actually out there.

And I was showing you how his manners are just as bad as Coulters. Since it seems that is the argument you were trying to make there. And how the hell can one read better with only 3 lines of text present? Does not leave much room for interpretation. Or did you not say what you really meant?

Bill O'Rielly bothers you that much? He at least has much better manners than Coulter. He is NO Republican either. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA Sure he does. He is a dangerous man for many ignorant people like Bill. OH and he is intelligent and reasonable HAHAHAHHA http://youtube.com/watch?v=tLPuGuaZTx8 With Jeraldo Revera. http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ctlmholr45c With Phil Donahue CHEAP SHOTS !!!! http://youtube.com/watch?v=MsuooIpnArQ Cuts off a former Colenels mic. http://www.crooksandliars.com/index.php?s=Ann+Wright Explains the above clip This is my fave part Notice the subtitles they put up during the interview. I shall continue WATCH OUT FOR LUNATICS !!!Bill needs dumb people on his show to make him better. Sometimes he gets the smart ones on his show. That ends up looking bad for him. Oh how I could go on......

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/11/t...ckles-imusgate/ Always can count on Jon.

Blueblood. Is that the only seed that is available for you to buy? Do you not have other choices? Are you contributing to your own problem by continuing to use Monstanos grain if there are other options to look at? If you want to make a difference and send a message, don't buy the product. I don't know much about the grain industry, so can you shed some light on that for me?

This thread is nothing but blatent trolling. Shame on you,

Indeed. Maybe if he layed off the pills he might have a better more reasonable air about him.

Multiculturalism will not kill society. Ignorance and bigotry can. Poverty and unemployment kills a society. If multiculturalism kills society, then why not just segragate everything again? Have we made no social advancements in the last few centuries? How does the nice elderly Lebanese woman next door destroy our society? Also do you realize that Canada and the US had depended on immigration from all over the world in order to continue to grow. How has it killed our society? I don't see it dead or even dying. And this society is great because of immigration and multiculurasmsmsms... Even other white people have different customs and traditions. And some would offend the skin off you. But you have not complained about that. Even your statement of 'whites built this society', they destroyed another society in the process(native american indians) or are you denying that? There was no chance for multiculturism. White man came and took everything. And now you want to deny what everyone else wants when you cannot even take the high ground because the society that was built by the white man destroyed another. There was no tolerance at all.

Blueblood. Are you not the same person who complained about GM seeds and copyright/patent issues? Seems like you have a personal hate for them there in that thread, but now have turned a 180. If you were to grow those same crops 40 years ago, before GM seeds, did you need bees to do the work then? Do some crops need pollination? Some crops do it themselves without any outside intervention? We still have no clue on the long term effects on humans after consumption of the GM products. Hell we thought it was a good freakin idea to pump all our cattle with hormones. Now that is starting to catch up with us. And don't you have to buy your seeds every year? Since the seeds cannot be used to plant another crop, they are designed to die out at the end of the season. The farmer cannot save any seeds for anything. This was not possible 30 years ago.

The world survived for sure. Even after we are gone (if we don't blow up this rock) this world will live on. It is the here and now we would like to perserve. Dinosaurs are history, hell most species died out in a meteor impact on this planet. GM foods are a cause for concern. The more we take mother nature out of the equation, the more we are setting up ourselves the ecobomb. So you have just shown that a serious decline in the bee population will not make all go away, but you have admitted it will reduce the amount we can grow. The less that is grown due to pollination not happening, the less food that is available to the population. Less food, means less population. Can't eat what you do not have. I work in a grocery distrobution warehouse. We have part of the warehouse airconditioned for the absolutely sick amount of different product we carry. Exotic fruits and veggies from all over North America, South America, some Australian, European and Middle Eastern grown foods. Without pollination, I can see the amount of different varieties simply vanishing. Here is how a GM crop has an effect on a bee population. Do GM crops even require pollination? Yeah, I guess it does need it. http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/be...y_gm_crops.html Now it seems there are many other factors that are contributing to the decline, but they think the introduction of Gm crops will really send it into a tailspin.