Army Guy

Maybe it is impossible for you, goggle works for me, maybe our goggle is federal funded and that much better...It states like in the sources i provided how much federal funds where supplied to each project...and what type of funds where provided.... No, we are talking about BC not getting any funding for ferry services and the maritime getting theirs payed for by federal funds...which were loaned by the way, and are required to be paid back.... this reduction of services is available to ALL Canadians that use them....even turkeys like you in BC....it was done becasue Carney promised it....had he not done this everything in your world would be gravy right....How many BC projects are BC going to repay in the long run.... Yes we are entitled that is why the roads are paved in gold, and everyone here earns atleast what you guys in BC earn....federal government does one project in the maritimes and you guys actually lay down kicking and screaming...yelling where is our's like the nation was suppose to read your minds....i wonder if that was on EBY's project list to have the feds pay for our national energy corridor.......my guess is no , i bet no one even thought about it until the media reported it was happening in the maritimes...now like a bunch of children your all crying ,snot running down your faces. it's not a good look....and the rest of Canada is asking who is the entitled ones.... BC gets its fair share of federal funding , a lot more than the maritimes...and when you guys stop crying and wipe your noses and do some research you'll see that...

Yes Alberta's resources which brings revenue to ALL of the nation....which every BC er benefits.... Yes lets throw in ontario and quebec when we are talking about the maritimes...Are you saying BC ship builders are not getting any contracts....come on now your reaching for what 20 bucks on the bridge toll, and one hundard on a ferry crossing... Yes, becasue the maritimes is the center of the world we have everything we could ever want "were entitled" once again your reaching i don't see any export LNG terminals being built here in NB , i don't hear any martiomers pointing at the entitled BC'er and saying where is out terminals...Maybe you should write to carney , he is the guy you voted for and have it changed.... Like i said the maritimes got a loan for the bridge and is repaying whatever tax dollars was used....how much is bc tax payers being charged for all those LNG projects ? as for the ferries, the price of the tickets will pay off the ferries which are federal run as it should be.... ..... as well,just like your ticket price will pay off any finances used in its procurement got nothing to do with entitlement...this is about one coast thinking that every tax dollar spent in the maritimes should be matched in BC....it does not work like that or the maritimes would be swimming in projects....you guys are being petty EBY is not asking for anything he is whining about something so small it is actually funny....total cost of this campaign promise is less than 100 million.....all the funding poured in bc projects is worth more than that...and your still whining actually almost crying that the maritimes got something and we did not....At the end of the day, this is the guy you voted in....you need to talk to that guy....The maritimes asked and he delivered....did BC ask ? so why is this an issue....

So you agree Canada should recognize a terrorist state run by terrorist government . When has this ever been a good idea...or is it a vote grab....PP has already stated his opinion on this several times....

Well according to Aristides he thinks so,you guys need to get on the same page....BC is the on the extreme left side of the spectrum, very similar to California RTFO of there....If the conservatives win any election, BC would be a great place for a new rebirth of the right.... threats , what you going to do herbie put on your skates, and grab a hockey stick challenge them to a game of shinny, real rubber pucks, and no shin pads... ...you guys on the left talk a good game, but lousy on execution of any threat... Our Canada has gone to soft to respond to any threat....see ya at the center ice...

My bad your premier and others on here incorporate it all into one big package ....The price to purchase the ferries, and operate them in all incorporated into the ticket price....all the moneys received go back into federal coffers, and will until the feds say so...not sure how BC tax payers money is involved like i said provide a source that states BC is funding our ferry service....I've shown you plenty of sources where Federal tax dollars have funded BC projects...and not one maritimer has said hey WTF why is BC getting more than we are...and do it on national tv....yep that is a head slapping moment....

Do you know how big PEI is....5660 sq kms...population of 180 K ... and it is spread out over a vast area, mostly in rural areas. you should stick to what you know, this topic is not one of them, BC has many rural areas, and i'm sure each on of them have civil service...we'll let you know when it becomes an issue that we who live here can't solve...until then you stay in your backyard and we'll stay in ours...is there any other issues you think you out in BC can solve... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward_Island

Any federal funding that was received to build the bridge "1 bil cdn", is being repaid by the sale of tickets or tolls....and that will continue until the feds say it is done sometime in 2032 was an estimate....So no loss of any tax dollars, the price of upkeep is incorporated into the toll price...not sure where you got this project was being subsidized by BC..show us a source please... Again i will ask how many projects in BC has federal tax payers money been used...and when it was did you ever hear one maritimer speak up and say this is bullsh!t,....when do we get our share of the money....you and your Pemier are sounding like a bunch of whiny kids....afraid of not getting your share....when your getting a lot more than the maritimes combined... BC is not contribute SFA towards a ferry service in the maritimes it is a pay as you go, so unless you use that service your meaning BC tax payers are not paying anything...all that ticket price goes back into federal coffers, to repay loans from the federal government.... Canada is a mess but not because of this issue....

TMX was built to get resources to tide water, which generates tax dollars for ALL canadians to enjoy...Citizens of BC work at these sites and docks are paid good wages, more than what it is going to cost the federal government in lost revenue of reduced infrastructure tolls currently set about by Carney..., There is more to the federal investment of many of the projects in bc , that are not just tax breaks, (which like the reduction in our ferries and bridge are lost revenue to the country)....but rather grants or loans or long term investments, provided to companies or province....which are tax dollars... My point here is this bridge and ferry are kept running through fees....no bc tax dollars or any tax dollars are used in the running of these services, they are pay to use...Until the feds decide that debt is paid...they own it...they set the cost of a ticket....Carney can not set the price of a BC company....your complaint about BC tax dollars being used to subsidize maritime infrastructure is a moot point.... as the price of the tickets include the price to repay federal investment in these projects...All the ticket price goes back into federal coffers... https://whattovisitwheretotravel.com/how-much-does-the-confederation-bridge-cost/

you should be a breakaway province.... Instead your wasting our time with suggesting the maritimes be renamed, or "Canadians" regardless of province of origin using some FEDERAL infrastructure here in NB and NS , NFLD get a rebate...it is like you never got any federal assistance for your province ......send your whinney complaints to Carney....

My point is this, one is federal, the other is control by BC government, Can carney order a rebate on a provincial ferry service...NO he can't, he is keeping a campaign promise....EBY can order a reduction of , you barking up the wrong tree....I could see you complaint if it was worth 100's of millions or even billions....but it is not they are reducing the federal fairs,no funding out of anyone's budget....your whining about crumbs in respective to the Feds yearly spending...when BC itself has received bils in federal spending...sounds like your being petty.... Those reductions apply to any Canadian that uses these services regardless of what part of the country you come from...including BC....come visit the maritimes and you to can get the rebate.... For a guy that lives there you don't seem to know much about these projects....with atleast 3 major LNG projects,being operated in BC and bils of federal tax dollars being used....have you heard one maritimer complain...no we are happy your province is getting some investment....and yet a simple reduction in bridge and ferry tickets and you guys are freaking out....thanks for the support well coastal gas link ring a bell... https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/iisd-pipelines-subsidies-fossil-fuels-1.6090871 then the trans mountain pipeline which provides BC jobs...and off sets https://globalnews.ca/news/9839473/trans-mountain-pipeline-cost-overrun/ Kitmat plant. LNG Canada’s Phase 1 terminal, a massive investment initially pegged at roughly C$17–18 billion, has been underwritten by significant public sector backing at federal, provincial, municipal, and international levels. https://cleantechnica.com/2025/06/21/billions-in-subsidies-flow-to-lng-canada-as-kitimat-terminal-nears-launch/ https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/275m-federal-government-lng-canada-kitimat-1.4649654 https://vancouversun.com/business/tax-break-a-cash-windfall-for-potential-lng-developers-in-bc-ubc-professor

BS...revenues from pipeline enrich Canada as a whole, money is collected through taxes and provided back to you and your province.........it provides good paying jobs to bc residents and elsewhere in Canada... Maybe , you should be bring this up to EBY....he has control over bc ferries....ask him for a rebate....i can't believe you whining about a 20 dollar hand out to people that use the bridge or ferry...The feds can't give a rebate on BC ferries because it is provincial...send me you address and i'll send you the 20 bucks next time i go to PEI...and just so you know....anyone that uses those ferries or bridge gets the hand out they don't care if your from NWT or BC just another reason to come to the maritimes...as long as you don't stay we already have a problem with to many people from ontario...

BC is Canada's California, and trust me you don't want more of those people....but if you insist,we will take one Wayne Gretzky rookie card, and a written contract stating you are going to keep celine dion, nickelback, Justin Bieber, forever....and you have to put Quebec on the short list to be the 52 and

Atlantic ferries are FEDERAL....BC ferries are provincial.phone eby.......the bridge toll is 40 bucks it is now 20 bucks....the NFLD ferry is 12 hours long and you save a few hundred bucks on a return trip...just a question how many federal dollars did you get for your natural gas pipelines,or natural gas liquification plant or federal funds for forest fires...and i bet you never heard anything from the atlantic provinces about look what bc got and we missed out on......All of this was Carneys campaign promises, you should write him about your problem tell him how unfair it is...

As a guy that lives here in NB ,i say you should call it "blow me Canada"...you do know these provinces were the first in the nation, this nation was born here in Atlantic Canada.......you also know that there is only so many seats for MP's in the atlantic area....which means seats on any committee is limited according to population already........ And "Quebec" gets more transfer money than anyone else combined, anyone up for renaming Quebec....check out what each atlantic province gets and it is not very much.......Now if we could keep those mutts from Ontario out of the maritimes from buying up all the cheap housing driving up prices to more than doubled over the last 5 years, becasue they work from home now.......then they whine about there is nothing to do here ...."where is all the night life they ask" F*ck ya, this is the maritimes, not downtown toronto....we make our own entertainment with beer and firearms...... Good thing we are all united....on one team Canada, what is it that august says oh ya we all get along....well we did until you decided to rename the provinces, we don't ask for much........nope the ROC got nothing better to do than start renaming provinces after a few beers.... Acadia is the northern part of NB it is where "your not going to believe this " but acadians live there French speaking NB'ers, and the rest of Atlantic canada does not like the name not to fussy about acadians either they are all liberals, can't speak english or french............maybe we should rename the other provinces... i got some douseys for Ontario....So crawl back in your holes....there are much bigger problems in the country than renaming provinces... PS tell doug ford, to send a sh!t ton of buses to pick up all their people that moved here...send the bill to black bird....and the liberal party...

Canadian companies that sell products in the US will charge more to cover US tariffs,US consumers will pick another product that is cheaper, if Canada has no sales then people get laid off. SO yes Americans will pay for those tariffs if there is no US made product that will replace it that would work.But there is always another US product..That is where Canadian tariffs come into play,making US products to expensive so Canadians will be forced into finding an alternative product...punishing US companies...

Thats one of the trump cards....maybe not tariffs but limited the amount exported, lack of supply will jack up the price....it will also make food imported from US here in Canada more expensive...

It also makes Canadian products more expensive, most people will start buying the cheaper products,Canadians will lose out on sales....

deserve it,you mean those that do not agree with you....And i really don't care what you do, you make it sound like a threat...should i be scared.... i was pointing out it seems that trolling consumes about 90 % of your time and effort, if the truth hurts do something about it...

They also contributed to most projects in BC...as they do with most provinces, regardless of how much they contribute to the provincial transfers....but this whole thing came out like a whine...they got it and we did not , we contribute to provincial handouts we should get the same... population wise not even close those ferries and bridges serve NB, NS, NFLD and PEI.... It was not an ask it was a whine...they just had a premiers meeting he could have asked then, i bet ya he has a phone right on his desk, with the PM phone number... insteads he goes on national TV and whines, i bet he waits a good long while before BC gets a discount, or a good talk from the PM, daddy probably not happy...

YA its a huge point alright...maritimers save 20 bucks on the bridge, and a couple hundreds on a 12 hour ferry ride to NFLD...it was a campaign promise that Carney made....EBY should have had the foresight to ask during the election....

I really don't care if you respect me or not, believe or not i do sleep great at night knowing that..... And i can say the same thing about you over the last year or so about leaning far left.... During that time you've spent 90 % of your time trolling on this forum pages upon pages wasted due to your behavior....again if they express a different opinion you troll , just like moonbeam...it is what you guys live for...that and giving out those pretty red arrows... Those are facts not my opinion

Sure...you should make a poll....

Freedom of speech is covered under the freedom of expression as you have been shown...if your entire agreement was it defined as freedom of speech no it was not. it was defined in the fine print in freedom of expression...And it is semantics, and your making a play on words...speech is protected here in Canada...and parks Canada can not override any of our freedoms....at any time, as it is a public domain...They were concerned about protesting groups and the safety of others because snowflakes can't stand the power of words...Snowflakes have control of the conversation, they have done so with many speakers or events from the US even Canada...this is another example....

It is not semantics, it is just worded differently....Expression is defined as ANY activity or communication ....the second red quote explains it even further it protects speakers and listeners....in order to protect speakers one must have "speech" 1. Does the activity in question have expressive content, thereby bringing it within section 2(b) protection? Expression protected by section 2(b) has been defined as “any activity or communication that conveys or attempts to convey meaning” (Thomson Newspapers Co., supra; Irwin Toy Ltd., supra). The courts have applied the principle of content neutrality in defining the scope of section 2(b), such that the content of expression, no matter how offensive, unpopular or disturbing, cannot deprive it of section 2(b) protection (Keegstra, supra). Being content-neutral, the Charter also protects the expression of both truths and falsehoods Freedom of expression includes more than the right to express beliefs and opinions. It protects both speakers and listeners (Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326). “Expression” may include all phases of the communication, expressing oneself in the language of choice (in order to do that you must have speech or sign language) https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art2b.html Protected expression has been found to include: “music, art, dance, postering, physical movements, marching with banners, etc.” (Weisfeld v. Canada, [1995] 1 F.C. 68 (F.C.A.), CanLII - 1994 CanLII 9276 (FCA) at paragraph 30 (F.C.A.); commercial advertising (R. v. Guignard, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 472; Ford, supra; Irwin Toy Ltd., supra; Rocket, supra; Ramsden v. Peterborough (City), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 1084; RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199; JTI-Macdonald Corp., supra); posters on utility poles (Ramsden, supra); peace camps (Weisfeld (F.C.A.), supra); signs and billboards (Guignard, supra; Vann Niagara Ltd. v. Oakville (Town), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 158); picketing (R.W.D.S.U., Local 558 v. Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 156; Dolphin Delivery Ltd. v. R.W.D.S.U. Local 580, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573; B.C.G.E.U v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214; Dieleman v. Attorney General of Ontario (1994), 20 O.R. (3d) 229 (Ont. Gen. Div.); Morasse v. Nadeau-Dubois; 2016 SCC 44); handing out leaflets (U.F.C.W, Local 1518 v. Kmart Canada Ltd., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 1083; Allsco Building Products Ltd. v. U.F.C.W. Local 1288 P, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 1136); ******(expressing oneself in the language of choice (Ford, supra);)****** hate speech (Keegstra, supra; R. v. Zundel, supra; Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, 2013 SCC 11, [2013] 1 S.C.R. 467; Ross v. New Brunswick School Board (No. 15), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 825; Taylor v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892); pornography (R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452; Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1120); child pornography (Sharpe, supra; R v. Barabash, 2015 SCC 29); communication for the purpose of prostitution (Reference re: section 193 and paragraph 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Manitoba),[1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123); noise being emitted by a loudspeaker from inside a club onto the street (Montréal (City), supra, at paragraph 58); importation of literature or pictorial material (Little Sisters, supra); defamatory libel (R. v. Lucas, supra at paragraph 25-27); voting (Siemens v. Manitoba (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 6 at paragraph 41; Haig v. Canada, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 995); running as a candidate for election (Baier v. Alberta, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 673); spending in election and referendum campaigns (Harper, supra; Libman v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 569; B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Association v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 6); broadcasting of election results (R. v. Bryan, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 527); engaging in work for a political party or candidate (Osborne v. Canada (Treasury Board), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 69); publication of polling information and opinion surveys (Thomson Newspapers Co., supra); monetary contributions to a fund may constitute expression, for example, donations to a candidate or political party in the electoral context (Osborne, supra), though not where the expenditure of funds would be regarded as the expressive conduct of the union as a corporate entity (Lavigne v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 211) and political advertising on public transit vehicles (

I found this from your own source...Note all of our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are listed in part 0ne, CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982....Freedom of speech is covered under freedom of expression https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-12.html