bud

here are more of these jewish children and their jewish mothers attacking palestinians: remember though, this is just a teeny weeny percentage of jews!

there are plenty of videos of these events online. lovely actions, some by young children. these settlers, numbering in the hundreds of thousands, engage in daily assaults of palestinian people and palestinian property such as farmland, homes and mosques. remember though, this is just a tiny teensy weensy eenie meenie fringe minority of "extremists".

that's obviously bullshit because they have had no problems arresting and sentencing other brown skinned people who have raped. you sir are trying to create a story out of nothing. grow up.

tThere are plenty of videos of these events online. lovely signs and slogans, some held by young children. these rioters, numbering in the hundreds, also assaulted police officers. remember though, this is just a tiny teensy weensy eenie meenie fringe minority of "extremists". not all white people are like this.

sports are the opiate of the people.

they should channel the rioting rage into sports, instead of politics. after all, sports is the opiate of the people.

omg omg videos! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7ePBJ_17GE

from your own link: Abdul Qayyum (left), 43, was sentenced to five years for conspiracy. Mohammed Amin (right) 45, was handed five years for conspiracy and sexual assault. The gang's 59-year-old ringleader, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was sentenced to 19 years in jail Abdul Aziz (left), 41, was given nine years for conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation. Mohammed Sajid (right), 35, received 12 years tor conspiracy, trafficking, one count of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child Hamid Safi (left), 22, was given four years for conspiracy and trafficking but not guilty of two counts of rape. Adil Khan (right), 42, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation Kabeer Hassan (left), 25, was jailed for nine years for conspiracy and rape. Abdul Rauf (right), 43, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation and jailed for six years looks like the title of the thread is correct and they're holding back in punishing these brown skinned assholes. can't wait to see the thread where you're up in arms in regards to the hundreds of catholic priests who fuck little boys and a system that allows them to get away with it.

wildbill? kraychick? shady? how do you feel about pressing a button that shoot rockets from drones which end up killing civilians? is the killing more civilized because it's high tech?

which is what? they say that the people who chant 'death to america' really want to annihilate america? i'm willing to change what i believe if you are able to show some proof that iran wants to annihilate america or israel. no one here has been able to show any proof with citations or links. maybe you can give it a shot?

all 1.6 billion muslims around the globe are out on the streets rejoicing and sending congratulatory text messages that an infidel has been beheaded. it's too bad that they don't have airplanes, helicopters and drones to kill people. because then killing people would be acceptable.

death to israel and death to america are all slogans and figures of speech that have been mistranslated. the real meaning as it's been said is 'down' with _____. it doesn't mean that they want to build a nuclear bomb and annihilate israel or america or britain. as you said, "some countries need a constant enemy around which it an galvanise its population and deflect from its internal failures". this is true in regards to america and israel and many other countries as well. they also need a bogeyman to continue to sell weapons to feed the military industrial complex. here is a good link on the myth of 'wipe israel off the map' comment: fair.org

lols! greatest line ever by shady!

you should look over the thread and see the response to that false statement. it has already been covered and all the hasbara bots, including the original poster, have failed to show how iran has threatened to annihilate israel.

so how will obama treat netanyahu in his last term? considering that bibi has tried to go over the head of obama. NYT Shaul Mofaz, the leader of Israel’s centrist Kadima party, posed three questions this month to Benjamin Netanyahu. Speaking in the Knesset, he said: “Prime minister, tell me, who is our biggest enemy, the U.S. or Iran? Who do you want replaced, Ahmadinejad or Obama? How low are you prepared to drag relations with our closest ally?” Ouch. Netanyahu has talked himself into a corner on Iran. He has set so many “red lines” on the Iranian nuclear program nobody can remember them. He has taken to fuming publicly over President Obama’s refusal to do the same. Of late he has juggled metaphors: Iran is now “20 yards” from “touchdown.” His cry-wolf dilemma comes right out of a children’s book. It was in 1992 that he said Iran was three to five years from nuclear capacity.

you're really going all out with your duty as a hasbara bot. it looks like blood thirsty zionists really want a war bad. anyone with the curiousity to read this thread beyond the title and the op sees how peeves is a liar just like you are.

let me interrupt the bigoted drivel and introduce you to some facts: The Myth of the Muslim Tide: Do Immigrants Threaten The West Saunders, a Globe and Mail correspondent and author of Donner Prize-winning Arrival City, sets about disputing the claims one by one, using facts from scores of demographic studies, surveys and historical documentation to prove his points. Saunders says he’s not out to defend Islam, but rather to debunk the myths and also highlight the genuinely alarming facts. For instance, Canadian conservative commentator Steyn, Saunders says, has recently argued that every European under the age of 75 is all but guaranteed to end his or her days living in an Islamified Europe. In a 2010 campaign speech during his run for the U.S Republican presidential nomination, Newt Gingrich referenced “stealth jihad,” the idea that Muslims are taking over the West by immigration and breeding. Saunders sets to debunk this by using various studies and statistics. He examines one study conducted by the Washington, D.C.-based Pew Research Center and concludes that “there are no signs of Muslims becoming a European majority or even a very large minority.” Muslims currently make up less than four per cent of the population of the European Union. Examining studies and surveys, Saunders says the rate of Muslim growth will probably level off and reach around eight per cent by 2050. Things aren’t much different in North America. In the United States, the Muslim population will double over the next 20 years, but that would still leave them at less than two per cent of the general population, around the same as Jews. In Canada, the Muslim population is expected to triple to just 6.6 per cent of the population in 20 years. None of the studies (including one by the U.S. Congressional Research Service) predict anything close to a Muslim majority. Muslims, Saunders argues, are also not reproducing faster than any other people. While he admits that immigrants do tend to have larger families, this stops within a generation or two, and Muslims in the West are not having more babies than the indigenous population. There is no conspiracy of deliberate growth, no invasion by reproductive means. and it goes on debunking other myths of the muslim tide. like these: in the same manner he debunks several other misconceptions: Immigration, he says, is not a Muslim monopoly, and certainly not an Islamic plot. Most immigrants to the West are not Muslim (the only exception being France, due to its former North African colonies). Muslim immigrants, he also argues, are not overwhelmingly guided by their religious beliefs. In France, for instance, less than five per cent of Muslims attend a mosque every Friday. Almost no French Muslims send their children to separate Islamic schools, and 42 per cent of French Muslims support the ban on hijabs and other religious items in schools. In America, he says, “even on the explosive issue of Palestinian-Israeli relations, Muslim immigrants are abandoning the views of their home countries and falling into the American mainstream. “In general, while [Muslim] values still lag behind those of non-immigrant neighbours… immigrants of Muslim origin are very clearly progressing toward integration at a rapid pace.” - 'the canadian jewish news': I need not remind readers of the claims made about Jewish immigrants – that they were a disloyal, fast-breeding fifth column bent upon imposing foreign religious laws to “Jewify” the society around them.

flake. *ding*

it has to do with your principles and your views when it comes to freedom of speech. are you going to answer the question or are you going to flake out? how you feel about the anti-holocaust denial laws in many of the european countries. are you for them or against them?

your feelings were correct. this is not the first time american woman avoids answering questions that may expose her selectiveness. but lets try again: i'm curious how you feel about the anti-holocaust denial laws in many of the european countries. are you for them or against limiting speech in this instance?

mitt romney: the corporate/colonial and zionist lapdog On a conference call with American rabbis Thursday evening, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney altered his position on what "red lines" he would set for Iran before deciding military action was necessary. link

good point.

this comment by you is pure fantasy: We saw what happened with Saddam when he tried to make the world believe he had WMDs. The world believed him! That's why he got invaded, deposed and eventually killed. how can we have a debate when your comments are not based on reality and instead on some alternate universe?

let me rephrase that: i'm curious how you feel about the anti-holocaust denial laws in many of the european countries. are you for them or against limiting speech in this instance?

i'm not sure how to respond to that. i'm assuming you're asking my hate level for these countries. if so, i can't answer that because i don't hate any country. i do dislike some regimes, but again, that's being simplistic. there are many factors and elements involved in how a government of a country functions. i dislike any violation of human rights. i also dislike hypocrisy and selectiveness. i admire neutralist countries such as brazil who seem don't seem to fear the backlash of speaking out against the actions of the more powerful countries along with anyone else who deserves condemnation. i also like ireland's government who don't pick and choose which country is worthy of condemnation of human rights violations unlike, for example, u.s and canada.