bud

sorry to inform you, but the occupied land is only "in dispute" in israel and your head. the rest of the world, including united states and canada agree with international law, that the land is occupied land which belongs to the palestinians and that israel is in violation of international law.

or they can acquit him, kind of like this. An Israeli army officer who fired the entire magazine of his automatic rifle into a 13-year-old Palestinian girl and then said he would have done the same even if she had been three years old was acquitted on all charges by a military court yesterday.

most of the b.s. kraychuk and bonam et al spew out have been debunked. it's not surprising that majority of the people who spew the lies about muslims are also the same people who are israeli apologists. they are the same people who try to create a negative image of muslims in the hopes of receiving support for the atrocities by zionists. 10 Myths About Muslims in the West 9. Muslims in the West cheer for terrorist violence While it might seem chilling to learn that 8% of American Muslims feel that violence against civilian targets is “often or sometimes justified” if the cause is right, you have to compare that to the response given by non-Muslim Americans, 24% of whom said that such attacks are “often or sometimes justified.” This is reflected in most major surveys. When a large-scale survey asked if “attacks on civilians are morally justified,” 1% of the French public, 1% of the German public and 3% of the British public answered yes; among Muslims, the responses were 2%, 0.5%, and 2%. Asked if it is “justifiable to use violence for a noble cause,” 7% of the French public agreed, along with 8% of French Muslims; 10% of the German public and fewer than 2% of German Muslims; 10% of the British public and 8% of British Muslims. This may well be because 85% of the victims of Islamic terrorism are Muslims. 4. Muslims will become a dominant group of cultural outsiders in the United States Despite the hysterical rhetoric coming from Newt Gingrich, Michelle Bachmann and their ilk, Muslims there are not only a very tiny group, but they are also one of the most integrated groups in the country - - especially if you consider that 69% of American Muslims are first-generation immigrants, and 71% of those immigrants arrived after 1990. There are only 2.6 million Muslims in the United States today. By 2030, that number is likely to rise to 6.2 million (because Muslims are young and fertile) - - at which point Muslim will be 1.7% of the population, almost as numerous as Jews and Episcopalians. Even though they’re new, American Muslims tend to be economically successful and highly educated. With 40% of them holding a college degree, they’re the second most educated group after Jews - - and far more educated than Americans in general, only 29% of whom have a degree. 8. Muslim immigrants are angry at the society around them In fact, Muslim immigrants appear to be MORE satisfied with the world around them, and its secular institutions, than the general population. Muslim immigrants in the United States are more likely to say they are “satisfied with their lives” (84%) than average Americans are (75%) - - and that number rises to 90% for American-born Muslims. Even among Muslims in neighourhoods where the community mosque has been vandalized - - an increasingly frequent occurrence - - fully 76% say that their community is an “excellent” or “good” place to live. This usually extends into pride in national institutions. For example, 83% of British Muslims say they are “proud to be a British citizen,” versus only 79% of Britons in general - - and only 31% of Muslims agree that “Britain’s best days are behind her,” versus 45% of Britons in general.

mr. canada is our stephen colbert

you are pathetic. where is your outrage for human rights when israel puts palestinians, including children in detention and without a fair trial? Israel urged to treat Palestinian child detainees in accordance with rights law – UN http://www.change.org/petitions/israeli-government-release-non-violent-palestinian-activist-fadi-quran-from-prison and it goes on and on and on.

you seem to always miss the biggest variables in the equation when you talk about the palestinians and that is israel's brutal occupation of them and the fast growing and illegal jewish settlements that are stealing palestinian lands. the slumping economy and the rockets don't happen for no reason. you need to grow up and start being honest about the situation.

don't expect jbg and the other hasbara bots to accept and deal with the reality of zionism.

and it needs to be done without us being there as our presence and tactics further fuel the flames of extremism.

what a horrific act. it's nice to see so many people come out to protest against the act. Thousands rally for Pakistani teen blogger Malala Yousafzai; Taliban promise death (with photos, video)

according to ottoman census records and justine mccarthy: In 1914 Palestine had a population of 657,000 Muslim Arabs, 81,000 Christian Arabs, and 59,000 Jews (including many European Jews from the first and second Aliyah). it's important to get your facts straight. it's true, majority of jews who migrated to palestine were from russia. however, i'd like to see something to back up your comment about how arabs migrated to palestine for work like it was some uninhabited land. [really now? how about some citation to prove you're not talking out of your ass. besides palestine, kenya and argentina were also looked at by the theodor herzl as a place for the jews to create a nation. at the end, they chose palestine. it's too bad the local palestinians didn't get to have a say in this. okay... and... and... what about israel, mr. balanced? what is likud's platform when it comes to a palestinian state? what has the israeli government vowed when it comes to a palestinian state? i'll refresh your memory: Self-Rule The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state. What has arafat/PLO/fatah have to say about israel's right to exist? The signing of the Declaration of Principles marks a new era in the history of the Middle East. In firm conviction thereof, I would like to confirm the following PLO commitments: The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security. The PLO accepts United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338. there goes mr. balanced, blaming it all on abbas and hamas and despite only one of the two governments has accepted israel's right to exist and despite likud's platform which vows to never allow a palestinian state, you blame it all on the palestinians. oh and lets not forget the increasing government funded illegal settlements on the palestinian land, which have accelerated in speed (because, you know, everyone is concentrating on iran). how come you never talk about the settlements and the israeli government's stance on a palestinian state? ooh. justifying the brutal occupation. thank you mr. fair and balanced. when was the last time a suicide bomber came from the west bank? when is the last time a rocket was fired from the west bank? why are there checkpoints in the west bank? oh and, what about the illegal settlements? why don't you ever talk about that? what about the control of the palestinian water which mostly go to the settlements and to israel? instead of pretending to being honest, why don't you actually be honest? this is no longer about israel's existence. this is about prolonging land theft and justifying the brutal occupation that has been going on for over 60 years.

how is that an answer? they were born jews, in a land far away from palestine. they had no connection to the land of palestine, except biblically. unlike the european jews, the arabs (both muslim and christian) and the real semite jews who have lived in that region have a real connection to palestine. so why this blatant hypocrisy of accepting israel, whose population is majority first or second generation from the land, but then not accepting a palestinian state whose majority muslim arab population has been living there for a very long time, and whose dna match with the jews and christians of the past. these arabs are the real ancient inhabitants of this land. so if you want to look at it that way, then facts ruin your whole point. so in other words, when they noticed that their land and homes have been stolen by the jewish colonists who migrated from europe, then they started caring that their homes have been stolen. sounds about right. the crocodile tears that i keep seeing is for the assertion that somehow the jews in europe have more of a claim to the land of palestine than the people who have been living there for many many generations.

he went where his family took him. he had no say in where to go. maybe he should consider cuba his home, since he stayed there the longest.

why play these games when majority of jews had 0 connection with palestine/israel before the mass zionist immigration? is there a point in bringing up arafat's uncles' tactics in beating the jews (ie; collaborating with the nazis), when irael's prime minister, ben-gurion was the leader of a terrorist organization before becoming prime minister?

if you cannot support your claims, you are failing.

then you fail again.

cite specific posts which show that i support terrorists. any post. go ahead. give it a shot. i tell you exactly how you're a zionist apologist and a hasbara bot by sharing the specific posts you make and showing exactly where you've apologized for the zionist regime and how you're propagating like a hasbara bot. it's good to remind you that you're hasbara bot. but i don't just say that you're a hasbara bot, i show how you're a hasbara bot.

how many israelis have been born in europe?

the zionist ideology is an ugly ideology. mostly because it promotes achieving its goals by any means, including walking all over other people's rights. i dislike zionism as much as i dislike wahabism and whatever form of theocratic ideology the rulers in iran follow. so you can think whatever you want, but to call me anti-semite based on my condemnation of the zionist ideology is ignorant.

quit trying to make excuses and trying to justify israel's blatant unwillingness to accept a palestinian state. the israeli government has vowed to never allow a palestinian state. this is pretty shitty. at least arafat and PLO/Fatah have formally accepted israel's right to exist and based on the 1967 border. israel cannot be trusted in willing to work towards creating a palestinian state. israel should be side-stepped and a palestinian state should be made official through the UN. much like israel was 60 years ago.

besides never agreeing to any terrorist activity, i've also stated i don't know support terrorism. can you prove that i support terrorism? if not, then you fail. i, on the other hand, prove that you support zionism and propagate misinformation and lies pretty much every time i comment on your comments. you're a hasbara bot and the supporter of a government who continues to violate international law. it's undeniable. what's fun? your failure in trying to flip the table?

then you don't know likud's platform: Self-Rule The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state.

international allowed israel to be created.

show me where. if you can't show where i've supported terrorism, you fail again.

anthrax can be and has been used as biological warfare. here is your 3rd chance to respond to these: what about: Howard Teicher served on the National Security Council as director of Political-Military Affairs. He accompanied Rumsfeld to Baghdad in 1983. According to his 1995 affidavit and separate interviews with former Reagan and Bush administration officials, the Central Intelligence Agency secretly directed armaments and hi-tech components to Iraq through false fronts and friendly third parties such as Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Kuwait, and they quietly encouraged rogue arms dealers and other private military companies to do the same or this: According to retired Army Colonel W. Patrick Lang, senior defense intelligence officer for the United States Defense Intelligence Agency at the time, "the use of gas on the battlefield by the Iraqis was not a matter of deep strategic concern" to Reagan and his aides, because they "were desperate to make sure that Iraq did not lose." Lang disclosed that more than 60 officers of the Defense Intelligence Agency were secretly providing detailed information on Iranian deployments. He cautioned that the DIA "would have never accepted the use of chemical weapons against civilians, but the use against military objectives was seen as inevitable in the Iraqi struggle for survival." Despite this claim, the Reagan administration did not stop aiding Iraq after receiving reports affirming the use of poison gas on Kurdish civilians. and this: Iraqi military personnel received various types of guidance from their American counterparts on U.S. soil. According to Roque Gonzalez, an ex-Special Forces officer with multilingual expertise, Saddam's elite troops received instruction in unconventional warfare at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. "The idea was that, in the event of an Iranian victory, the Iraqi soldiers would be able to wage a guerrilla struggle against the occupying Iranian force" and this: The United States assisted Iraq through a military aid program known as "Bear Spares", whereby the U.S. military "made sure that spare parts and ammunition for Soviet or Soviet-style weaponry were available to countries which sought to reduce their dependence on the Soviets for defense needs." back to the chemical weapons: On February 9th, 1994, Senator Riegle delivered a report -commonly known at the Riegle Report- in which it was stated that "pathogenic (meaning 'disease producing'), toxigenic (meaning 'poisonous'), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce." The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. how about some diplomacy: In 1984, Iran introduced a draft resolution to the United Nations Security Council, citing the Geneva Protocol of 1925, condemning Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons on the battlefield. In response, the United States instructed its delegate at the UN to lobby friendly representatives in support of a motion to take "no decision" on the use of chemical munitions by Iraq. If backing to obstruct the resolution could be won, then the U.S. delegation were to proceed and vote in favour of taking zero action; if support were not forthcoming, the U.S. delegate were to refrain from voting altogether.

yes. you type a lot, but unless you are able to cite where i have defended terrorists, then this is just more hot air from you.