lictor616

yes that's right: reject everything out of hand (because its too easy to refute)... yawn... much better to censor, and boycott questioning ... its must less suspicious and convincing that way...

yes lets! perhaps we can delve into a little stats and facts and whatnot to see if indeed some Muslim creeds, culture or people are indeed barbarous or ie: "savage"... they we can discuss exactly how our third world immigration system (which allows Canadian employers to hire Immigrants to fill Canadian jobs) doesn't in fact "TAKE POTENTIAL JOBS AWAY FROM CANADIANs"... I'd really love for you to explain this concept. say we have a barrel of 15 apples to be shared with 15 non-new immigrant Canadians... our government invite a Mexican over to get an apple for himself... how does this not deprive a canadian of an apple?

Liberal internationalism has seen the worst recorded wars, famine, suffering and senseless destruction then ANY OTHER TIME COMBINED in recorded history... How anyone with eyes in his head and half a brain can say that it allows "humanity to escape raw violence" is simply beyond my ability to comprehend... For god's sake! As I type this, 2000 children will die from easily preventable disease, and almost twice as many women will die or suffer serious disability in pregnancy or childbirth for lack of simple remedies and care. Let me quote from a past essay of mine on just this subject: "1/United States: Distribution of Wealth % of US Population % of Wealth Owned ========================================================== Top 1% 38.1% Top 96-99% 21.3% Top 90-95% 11.5% Top 80-89% 12.5% Top 60-79% 11.9% General 40-59% 4.5% Bottom 40% 0.2% Source: le monde diplomatique 2003 2/ A U.N. report shows that the income inconsistency among the world 's richest 20 percent of the populace and the poorest 1/5 widened from 30:1 in 1960 to 74:1 in 1997. 3/ About 0.13% of the world’s population controlled 25% of the world’s assets in 2004. Ignacio Ramonet, The politics of hunger, Le Monde diplomatique, November 1998 4/ 20% of the world’s population consume 86% of the world’s goods while 80% of humanity gets just the remainder 14%. (Eileen Alt Powell, Some 600,000 join millionaire ranks in 2004, Associate Press, June 9, 2005)" This wealth gap continues to amplify with the continued democratization of the world alongside the Liberal/idealist principles which underlines it. With the aforementioned in mind, no pretense of liberty, equality, democracy and togetherness can possibly be entertained. Your statement about liberalism benny is not only a serious analytical error, but a positively criminal one, with harsh and destructive human penalties. If you would consider the historical record - you'll find that the more "left wing" an idea: the more meddlesome and usually disastrous it is.

yes... Theodore Kaufman in many an article quoted that figure and I thought that common knowledge of the 40 million reader's digest figure was widely known... Some 1945 resources (reader's digest, time magazine, life magazine and countless other corroborate the 12 million figure for the total number of JEWS... )

bet you can't point out to a single instance of it... and I bet you have not a word of reprimand for the many here who positively and explicitly hate anyone who is "TOO WHITE" for them...

AHHAHAhahahaaha pfffff just what we need! Inuit taught as third official language! A government tax to update computers, Windows vista, milk cartons, with appropriate native "dialects" right alongside French and English... sheer brilliance! I love to see the lefty "Mind" at work, ever so exhaustively trying to sniff out perceived "iniquity" and make it illegal... First Nation people's don,t even recognize the French OR English to begin with...

no we are not all "speaking form a mindset of liberal democracies". and the preference for mercantilism began to lessen in the late 18th century, as the arguments of Adam Smith began to gain precedence... before him, David Hume was probably the real "INSTIGATOR" rather. so your implication is that the very real efforts made by the abolitionists and countless other Europeans to outlaw slavery WORLDWIDE (mind you) is nothing important? And a "new social contract" will validate our science? what are you even on about?

ahhh yes... the more issues of diversity we have the stronger no? so clearly: more languages= better strength right? I mean that's what are government says...

morally flawed? according to who's morality code? If we must redress the ills (either real or imagined) of our ancestors, then it is also right to reap the BENEFITS... If it is right to be ashamed of our ancestors strong arming other (and necessarily enemy) peoples for their resources, then perhaps we can feel pride and joy at the knowledge that ours is the ONLY people to outlaw slavery, to produce in incomparable literature of romance and vicarious experiences, and producing an immensely ingenious science. sorry then, the Euro-bashers and haters of the West, must take the bitter with the sweet. also what would be "redressing the wrongs"? Sending all of the decedents of the blacks slaves now squatting in America and the Caribbean on homebound ships for africa? Should we recapture our medical knowledge ? dismantle our hospitals everywhere in the non-western globe? Take back our cars, our computers, our tools?

not at all.... I use this word to describe the very white "squeegee panhandlers" I see far too often on street corners and some Haitian boat people once... savage doesn't necessarily denote one's "race"... maybe to you it has a certain connotation... but anyways.

Hilberg bases his estimates of Jewish population on these very same almanac figures... Is raul hilberg a "holocaust denier" too? So does Leni Yahil... btw... and a difference of 5 million? ... what implications does this have for the 6 million number? The fact is that the official Holocaust story does display irregularities and it would be quite right to dispute them to set the record as straight as possible.... but it won't happen because the shoddier academia of "holocaust studies" is for all practical purposes illegal to debate. after all The Nuremberg tribunals listed 3 eye witness accounts (3 of them having different testimonies) to account for the 750 000 dead jews in Treblinka... not a single sample soil was taken, no forensic investigations... nothign.. for Treblinka we have 3 eye witness accounts... and the questionable self sabotaged testimony of Kurt Gerstein... If one expresses any doubts about any of this... its considered criminal in some countries... deplorable isn't it?

how was anything of what argus said "racist"?

Quechua is hardly as indigenous as you seem to think it is. I can understand minute parts of it myself... About half of the modern Quechua vocabulary is directly borrowed from Spanish... the Quechua alphabet is (you guessed it!) Latin and contains innumerable bastardized versions Quechua from Merida venezuela for instance although called Quetchua would astonish a Peruvian Quechuan speaker. and you really have to stress how well (or rather badly) it is spoken. either way: this misses the point.

I used the word "apparently" when citing that Wikipedia source: its not the best of sources but for the purposes of expediency... I used a source you seemed comfortable with. and Ireland was pretty much raped by the Romans (literally) ... thousands of irish girls (being exquisitely attractive) was shipped for slavery by the romans...

Whatever policy is having our "barely out of ponytails" 18 year old 105 pound little girls fight wars for us: is a perverse policy.

Irish culture does exist (and retains many points of reference), but it has largely been undermined by British and before that: Roman encroachments. The situation probably isn't quite as dire for the Irish (as a great many still retain correct and sufficiently complete knowledge of their culture and History- unlike the Venezuelans I met) but you'd be quite right in saying an "Irish Culture" today is a fairly thin read. Gaelic is a dying language. apparently speakers include: 355,000 fluent or native speakers (1983) 538,283 everyday speakers (2006) 1,860,000 with some knowledge (2006) out of 5,981,448 Irish people, and maybe 200 000 out of the 30 million Irish americans speak Gealic... smatterings of bastardized Nahuatl is still spoken by approximately 900 000 people out of hundreds of millions of south americans... a lamentable showing for both... your point?

I still find these figures rather curious. Also the leading authority of the Holocaust (the late Raul Hilberg) stipulates that in his "destruction of the european jews" takes his figures and estimates from the Almanacs available at the time (he began his immense work in 1949-1951)... how where these "corrections" available to him? And already snippets from the press (An article in reader's digest February 1943 for instance) increased the number to six million, and to keep up the inflation, it was later claimed that about 40,000,000 jews were destroyed ... followed by a revision that was reduced to 12,000,000, by the end of the war- , the figure of six million was taken as the largest that could be possibly imposed. So really if you repudiate the almanac- you deny the holocaust (because you contradict doyen of the official Holocaust story: Hilberg), and if you don't then you're a revisionist... seems like your a "vicious, holocaust denying, goosestepping anti-semite hitler lover" either way... yes the holocaust is a mighty tricky business.

your source says nothing of 35%... and wow "wikipedia"... ahem... World Almanac, 1936, pg. 748 -- world jewish population = 15,753,633 World Almanac, 1938, pg. 510 -- world jewish population = 15,748,091, with 240,000 in Germany American Jewish Committee Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 1939 -- population of Jews: 15,600,000 World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population est. -- 15,319,359 World Almanac, 1941, pg. 510: World Jewish Population est.-- 15,748,091 World Almanac, 1942, pg. 849: World Jewish Population est. -- 15,192,089 ("Jews include Jews by race not necessarily by religion")- According to the 1942 World Almanac (pp.594) World Almanac USA, 1947, pp. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000 World Almanac, 1949, pp. 289: World Jewish Population -- 15,713,638 Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 -- 15,300,000 i dunno...

The "Amerindian feel and flavor"... wow dancer, i'd love to get what ever your hopped-up on... So we still see Mexicans, Venezuelans, Colombians, Chileans etc readily speak Nahuatl and other pre Spanish dialects eh? Really? I bet we still see sacrificial processions in many towns and gosh I bet south americans still file down their teeth to give off the appearance of a raucous animal. Perhaps shrunken heads are also in vogue there? I was on exchange through AFS in 2002 for a year... traveled Venezuela, Columbia extensively... and you know who people worship and veneer there? Ancient tribal mores the "Aztec" ?... not at all... Simon Bolivar and Christianity gets probably 95% of the cultural pie... and so far as I could tell, Spanish was the only language I ever heard there. Except in Brazil... which as you doubtless know is Portuguese... ah yes... Europe hardly left a dent there- native culture is "thriving" hard... The "Amerindian feel" hasn't evolved, it has disappeared... vanished... irrevocably.. forever. If it didn't: bleeding heart liberals wouldn't have a reason to be sobbing and complaining about Cortez so much...

35% ... source? I'd love to challenge you on the holocaust ... though its probably best not to...

hear hear

you didn't respond to my previous comment on your silly comparison to Poland... that comment of yours had the intellectual depth of a windshield flier.

equating a cultural tradition (the observance of Christmas) with the remembrance of the misfortunes of another people, another religion, another culture is a little flawed isn't it. Its like asking a neighbor to feel the same degree of pain and angst as you over the death of YOUR child. Also, why only the Jews? As far as one can tell, the only reason we incessantly hear about the holocaust is as a reminder of how terrible things can get... Yet far more terrible examples of genocide and mass murder are readily available: the horrors of the Ukraine Holodomor (where 7 to 10 MILLION died in barely two years time) is one I would like to see mentioned. What about the Nanking Massacre? The height of horror and human suffering that was Mao's "great" leaps forward- in which 40 million perished in under 11 years. What of the 60 to 67 million dead in soviet Russia and in the GULAG system: where an inmate's life was usually measured in hours? The Katyn Forrest Massacre? This bizarre fawning on the Holocaust (hallowed be its name) really makes no sense at all.

that's almost certainly inaccurate. the mounds of accumulated filth there usually block the sidewalks in their own neighborhoods forcing people unto the streets to avoid them. I'd hate to see them PROTEST. It really is deplorable to see though. Here we chinless canadians are, inviting in our own country the unnapeasable hatreds that have been festering in southern India (the Deccan) for at least a millenia. Its true that the British, wicked colonialists that they were, restrained the native yearning to massacre racially differing groups, but since India has been liberated from such wanton oppression, we will be witnessing massacres in that region of the globe (and wherever the delightful creatures happen to be residing at the moment- Tonronto, Montreal etc) with increasing intensity and viciousness. The unappeasable racial hatred of these groups is extremely old as the Ramayana on the subject of the Tamils (people from the south ie: Vanars) clearly corroborates: The natives of the Deccan (Tamils and Dravidians alike) are described as a race of monkeys (!).

you get points for actually trying to show me through A and B how my statement was incorrect though... Usually you would have simply rejected out of hand and produced a comment like: "lictor, your argument is ridiculous"... end of comment.