lictor616

that's not very surprising, it will not have been the first time that incredible party has been tarred by drug allegations... what about Bill and Roger Clinton selling cocaine right out of the governors lodge in Arkansas? And sending their secret service agents out to scout whores for them? What about the filmed tapes of Bill Clinton snorting cocaine and swearing like a sailor? What about the bizarre murders and questionable "suicides" surrounding his administration? Its not hard to find dirt on the criminals who are at present destroying the united states... Obama ADMITTED to cocaine use and has sworn depositions against him having numerous encounters with male prostitutes where he indulged in meth induced sodomy.... And the poor americans think they can VOTE their way into sanity again? hahahah crazy americans!

Our country was and still is inhibited by the fiction about "human rights," which are presumably ordained by some unnamed deity, so that we could not face the fact that there can be no rights except those a society, whether a tribe, a nation, or a country, bestows on its members and may deem it expedient to extend in part to such aliens as it tolerates in its midst. And in a multi-cultural and multiracial country, which is not a society but only congeries of biologically, culturally and psychologically incompatible individuals, there can be no actual rights, only minorities bartering and hustling for preferential treatment or only concessions its rulers deem it expedient to make at any given time. Our courts have long been opposed to justice, but none more so then the travesty called "the human rights commission" ... We have a Black-coddling and criminality-excusing justice system that is in the process of DESTROYING the hard earned freedoms given to us by earlier and saner candians. I remember when blacks took to the streets of montreal when a raucous street thug "Freddy Villaneuva" jostled a female police officer of 115 pounds (who got her job probably thanks to affirmative action under the ruling of that same "human rights commission") for her pistol, and was shot down and murdered... this caused an outrage among our dear sensitive minorities, and this made them riot and burn and rape and loot for a few days. this was an instant wherein the commission caused the problem and made it impossible to implement a solution. Our sacrosanct minorities naturally loot and destroy when they see a good opportunity or have a suitable pretext for tribal festivities. It was not at all remarkable that in Montreal packs of savages drove up in their taxis and cars they had been given, directly or indirectly, by canadian idiots, and looted and destroyed stores and even fire departments (!) right in front of cameras while the human rights comission of Quebec ordered the police not to be too rough with the little darlings. Our minorities contempt for the Canadian tax-paying animals that work for them is almost infinite and certainly justified. The incidents in Montreal will, of course, be repeated frequently, greatly improved and on a continually enhanced scale in the near future. Eventually, even small "un-diverse" towns who are too backward to enjoy the echo of the recent festivities the Big Cities, will share in our country's progress toward the ideal status of what was Rhodesia and the new South Africa.

No I co-own a company, and was forced to hire 3 out of 10 of our employees (as per the requirements our affirmative action grant standard) who where members of the afro-Caribbean "community". but wait a minute! why shift the onus onto me personally? Do you deny that mass unskilled turd world immigration has a negative impact on wages?

far more egregious also when we consider that Wilders lives with 24 hour body guard protection and is under constant death threat... yet HE is the criminal? its amazing that we don't hear more about this... what a world

who would dream to think that this is a conservative issue? The champions of bars on free speech are all staunch liberals and lefties alike.

this does indeed change a lot... I'm not so sure I would allow him his free speech anymore....

that's right keep focusing on the man, not the arguments... a favorite in the tactic of shysters and shirkers.

I could no better then to quote such a learned and indisputably correct scholar. Of course you could could always focus on the topic proposed rather then on ad hominem irrelevancies. This fairly states the general truism of the "iron law of inequality".

LOL no, not at all. THE idea of "Natural Equality" is one of the most per­ nicious delusions that has ever affected mankind. It is a figment of the human imagination. Nature knows no equality. The most cursory examination of natural phenomena reveals the presence of a Law of Inequality as universal and inflexible as the Law of Gravitation. The evolution of life is the most striking instance of this fundamental truth. Evolution is a process of differentia­ tion--of increasing differentiation--from the simple one­ celled bit of protoplasm to the infinitely differentiated, complex life forms of the present day. And the evolutionary process is not merely quantita­ tive; it is qualitative as well. These successive differen­ tiations imply increasing inequalities. Nobody but a madman could seriously contend that the microscopic speck of protoplasmic jelly floating in the tepid waters of the Palæozoic Sea was "equal" to a human being. But this is only the beginning of the story. Not only are the various life types profoundly unequal in quali­ ties and capacities; the individual members of each type are similarly differentiated among themselves. No two individuals are ever precisely alike. We have already seen how greatly this dual process of differentiation both of type and individual has affected the human species, and how basic a factor it has been in human progress. Furthermore, individual inequalities steadily increaseas we ascend the biological scale. The amœba differs very little from his fellows; the dog much more so; man most of all. And inequalities between men likewise be­ come ever more pronounced. Thus, we see that evolution means a process of ever- growing inequality. There is, in fact, no such word as "equality" in nature's lexicon. With an increasingly uneven hand she distributes health, beauty, vigor, in­ telligence, genius--all the qualities which confer on their. possessors superiority over their fellows.

more equal or less equal ... that doesn't exist does .. EQUAL IS EQUAL: i.e.: of the same measure, quantity, amount, or number as another (2): identical in mathematical value or logical denotation : equivalent b: like in quality, nature, or status... no blacks are not at all EQUAL - and neither are individual blacks INSIDE the ethnicity. is there anything incorrect about my proposition?

Correlation in DNA!?!??! What in the world does that empty sophistry mean? Of course any geneticist will also tell you that we share 99.87% of our genome with chimpanzees... does this mean that we're pretty much identical and share all genetic and mitochondrial markers as monkeys? If a human develops an innate natural physical characteristic: Kinky Hair or blond hair it IS genetic. What makes white people have blonde hair? The hair color gene MC1R with at least seven variants in Europe. Based on recent genetic information carried out at three Japanese universities, the date of the genetic mutation that resulted in blonde hair in Europe has been isolated to about 11,000 years ago during the last ice age. The MC1R gene is found in no black people... Its true that some polynesian tribes and pacific islanders have blond kinky hair... but of course a different gene produces it. The MC1R gene is unique to european as is the gene or genes for black kinky hair in sub saharan congoid type blacks. talk about subjective... anyways the point again is that there is no such thing under the sun as equality, racial, individual, ethnic or otherwise. And nothing you do or say will change that fact.

this is perhaps the biggest tautological argument i've ever heard in my life. There is no guiding hand... but if a mutation gives an advantage in survival the chances are that taht gene or mutation will persist ... Hence- the iron law of survival of the fittest which ordains the survival of humans with genetic properties best suitable for life in a specific environment. The guiding hand is survival. How much of an advantage black skin gives to africans? I've already shown you that in cancer rates and other ills of the skin so common to "white" people.

I suppose people with downs can supply us with the indispensable work of recycling plant "sorters"... see maybe that can be productive? although I admit that is being streamlined and increasingly mechanized... and as FAS children become grown and hardened sociopaths, and rape, slug and murder... this will help the economy by the dramatic increase in police demands to pamper the dear little cuties. That will create jobs in police, and mental institutions (paid for of course by yours truly the stupid bovine taxpaying serfs of the United Socialist Satellite of Canadia... is that your vision of a saner world?

ahaahahah! I suppose if we let the population carry 5 million people with Downs and FAS... we'll be much smarter and saner on the average... are you even trying anymore ?

which concentration camps were these? The Soviet Gulag- The Gaza Strip the West bank? And we abortion was and still is a sane act. It is also obvious that a sane society will act to check, by every means within its power, the fearsome and potentially catastrophic pullulation of its misfits and dregs. WE must refrain from the folly of preserving the diseased and degenerate. What I've been trying to say is that "Euro Candians" must decide, and decide promptly, whether their people and ethnicity is worth perpetuating to sustain the great civilization that their not so remote ancestors (Europeans) created. Western Civilization. If they decide that "white canadians" should be stamped out to make way for a happy land of hypermongrelized "multiraces" and a hybridized and crazed "multiculture" of incompatible mores, as the Jews of B'nai B'rith and JDL as well as the NDP and Liberal parties intend, they should, in the name of human decency as understood by our people, totally refrain from bringing children into the world to suffer what they must in the coming catastrophe. Meanwhile, "third worlders" are unlikely to consider limiting their offspring, even if they do not have a perhaps subconscious determination to take the lands of North America from the Canadian weaklings, whom they despise for their stupidity in admitting aliens. All this, to be sure, is "racism," which, as we all have been told, is the damnable wickedness that doubts the self-evident fact that white Canadians are a species of stupid cattle, created by Yahweh to nourish all of the world's anthropoid vermin.

my reply was to aposter who affirmed that skin tone had no basis in genetics and had no identifiable markers... I corrected his error. that's what the point was.

having a sane, stable, viable, beautiful and productive society once again. what else?

Yes, skin is intricately linked with genes... the SLC24A5 gene for instance variant plays a sizable role in human skin pigmentation. So yes skin pigment is very genetic. the link I provided explains at least 3 genetic markers explaining one's pigment. and I suggest that you take a look at the 36-tone chromatic scale devised by Austrian anthropologist Felix von Luschan to assess the unexposed skin of human populations.

the anointed one? We should bluntly denounce that Christianity in all its diverse cults is a spiritual syphilis that has now reached the tertiary stage, paresis and insanity. Like the african disease kuru: it seems to rot the brain of its victims. But Christianity is after all Jewish. And looking at another product of the tribe, the Jewish scribbler named Mordecai Levy (alias: Karl Marx) with his "das kapital" and its conspicuously IDENTICAL proposition to the bible: who teaches its readers that "all men are created equal" and that " the first shall be last" and all of the basic denials of realities that are based in racifimentos of the Jewish cult of Christianity, we can see the trends and who are behind them- pretty soon it will be illegal to say nything that displeases God's own Sublime Hebrews, and if we look at the stupendous grip that this political censorship has on our hapless country, and the contempt that the JDL has for profane goyim, we can perhaps at alst see the animus behind it. I am reminded of the ravings of Isaiah, especially 49.22-23: "Thus sayeth the Lord God, Behold, I will lift up my hand to [i.e., against] the Gentiles, and set up my standard [as a sign of conquest] to the people; and they [as slave nurses] shall bring thy sons in their arms, and thy daughters shall be carried upon their shoulders. / And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers they shall bow down to thee with their face toward the earth, and lick up the dust of thy feet." But, despite every effort that may be made to disclose historical facts, the Goy suckers who are the victims of organized crime will doubtless continue to relish the swill that their owners dump in their laps. They have been taught to love those who wish them harm. We can already assume that Canadians who are now under five and go through the idiot hatcheries which for some reason are still called "schools", will surely grow up to be imbecile creatures, so well trained that whenever they see Jews, they will automatically drop to their knees and knock their foreheads three times on the pavement in veneration of their living gods.

ROFL.... sheer nonsense! unfortunately fully none of the sub saharan "black" tribes in africa mastered hat weaving hence... their brain did not INVENT the hat. "Nature has selected for people with darker skin in tropical latitudes, especially in nonforested regions, where ultraviolet radiation to hear the preceding term pronounced radiation from the sun is usually the most intense. Melanin acts as a protective biological shield against ultraviolet radiation. By doing this, it helps to prevent sunburn damage that could result in DNA changes and, subsequently, melanoma --a cancer of the skin. Melanoma is a serious threat to life. In the United States, approximately 54,000 people get this aggressive type of cancer every year and nearly 8,000 of them die from it. Those at highest risk are European Americans. They have a 10 times higher risk than African Americans." (http://anthro.palomar.edu/adapt/adapt_4.htm) skin tone is certainly not a RANDOM mutation, but a trait developed through rigorous natural selection to cope with specific environments. Anyone who denies this is simply playing dunderhead.

QUOTE (lictor616 @ Mar 24 2009, 04:27 PM) "Well notice of course: that I was responding to a claim made by another poster (progressive conservative) to the effect that we all come from Ethiopia ... and that (he reasoned) since it was out of Ethiopia (and modern day residents of Ethiopia are blacks), the poster assured me: the only pure race is the black race... since obviously the first pre human anthropoids were blacks"... M.Dancer: "The out of Africa theory is accepted widely. Whether the first humans tp leave africa were black skinned is unknowable and irelevant." -DO you bother reading before wasting your time replying? I repeat: I was responding to Progressive Tory who assured us that (to quote him directly): Progressive Tory: “We all came out of Africa and us white folks are mutations. The only pure race is the Black African.” Now please remember that I did recognize that fossilization does in fact destroy DNA and so we can’t tell for sure. But then again why are you telling ME this? Take it up with Progressive Tory- who seems to think that the closest living thing to our prehuman ancestors are blacks (which is not entirely implausible since they would have required the least amount of separate evolution- since they would have lived in similar conditions as lucy) Of course you're entirely correct when you affirm that DNA is usually destroyed through fossilization. And yet here you are responding to ME as if I originated the claim. I was simply taking the poster's claim to its logical end: that of blacks being indeed closer to lucy- and different from other groups and clines for it. QUOTE And notice of course, that in prior posts I speak of an "iron law of inequality" between ALL humans... and that all groups of humans ... furthermore all individual within broadly definable groups of humans ARE also UNEQUAL. M.Dancer:“No idea what you are on about here.” Really you have no idea? Allow me to repeat: “speak of an "iron law of inequality" between ALL humans... and that all groups of humans a moment ago you were talking about “random genetic mutations” between large groups of humans – how does this not agree with my proposition that we are all uneqal through this “differentiated mutation”? and by the way before you derail again: i urge to look at the skin cancer rates between whites and blacks... and perhaps then you could explain to me how skin was a "random" and unimportant triviality. you can't be this cynical can you?

Well notice of course: that I was responding to a claim made by another poster (progressive conservative) to the effect that we all come from Ethiopia ... and that (he reasoned) since it was out of Ethiopia (and modern day residents of Ethiopia are blacks), the poster assured me: the only pure race is the black race... since obviously the first pre human anthropoids were blacks... Of course you're entirely correct when you affirm that DNA is usually destroyed through fossilization. And yet here you are responding to ME as if I originated the claim. I was simply taking the poster's claim to its logical end: that of blacks being indeed closer to lucy- and different from other groups and clines for it. And notice of course, that in prior posts I speak of an "iron law of inequality" between ALL humans... and that all groups of humans ... furthermore all individual within broadly definable groups of humans ARE also UNEQUAL. How is environmental determinism incapable of withstanding scrutiny? A theory of evolution is nothing BUT environmental determination. Random mutations sometimes, and evolution from different stocks of pre-human anthropoids also. But who would dream to think that having black skin (known to protect more adequately from the harmful effects of the sun) is a "random" trait picked up by sub saharan africans? Europeans for instance are ascertained to originate from the Cro Magnon... but then again how is a theory of complete ethnic or racial or even mitochondrial equality exist? You've yourself have suggested nothing but examples indicating INEQUALITY.

what is nonsense? That blacks had to adapt to DIFFERENT conditions, different ways of adapting to their environment and that this made them DIFFERENT genetically? Are you cynical enough to claim that black skin and kinky hair is a product of racism and poverty and not of millenias of adaptation to the sun? Talk about nonsense..

Not that you would think brain damage is an insult (how witty and sharpish you are!) What is weird? Could you show me specifically? Who should inhabit the earth? what the!? I,m talking about what will need to be done to make the world viable for optimal life for humans... where is the disconnect here? Is your font type scrambling my comment? wake up already

With such a pronouncement, you make obvious the fact that you can't read coherent discourse. Where do I support creationism? Its astounding that despite my trenchant words for religion- for some reason or other- see me as a religious dolt... I am an atheist, and regard religion (especially the three desert doctrines) as drivel and nonsense that should impose on no one with half a brain. and yes we all come from the PRE-HUMAN (think about that) anthropoid lucy 3.2 million years ago. - and if you go back further - you'll realize that we all come from the primordial ooze billions of years ago. And yes "blacks" i.e: sub saharan africans are the closest genetically to lucy (having evolved differently). And how did you come up with the proposition that I'm out to DESTROY anything? If anything I wan't to PRESERVE the biological diversity of the globe- as I said we're all unequal - and this fact is good because it is NATURAL. try to read more carefully...