lictor616

facepalm/ Ashkenazi Jews are quite European in characteristics... from 400 years of interbreeding ... many have blond and red hair... so yes .. all of these different progressions are signs and living proof that genes bestow different types and degrees of intelligence just as they bestow different skin tones, eye color, type of hair etc... what a DUH moment..

Oh you are racist.. make no mistake about it... just read your anti-white ravings to see: you use only negative adjective to describe us.... they came from a culture with BETTER "technological knowledge".... but that doesn't make them BETTER? I'm lost again... I don't think its possible for us to ever understand what we're saying to each other... I mean I might as well be talking with aliens from pluto... A culture is only as superior as its technology and capacity to project its power... that's the only measurable vector of "superiority" again the age old saying rings true: "The strong do what they want and the weak suffer what they must" A culture must be either feared or be a victim ... there is no other alternative... Cultural relativism is a delusion and a disease of the mind. (actually you're not relativistic... since the only value jugment you make are negative ones on Western culture... so its clear that you see Western Culture as hopelessly inferior to all others...)

Australia was a barren wilderness ... with no roads, no mapping, NOTHING was in place in Australia... again your willful obtuseness is mere bickering... obviously that's what's was meant by "SCRATCH"... oh but wait a minute are you saying they were able to do this feat of human progress because of the GREAT culture they took after from? ! AH HA!!! hmmm that's smacks of racism or "Eurocentrism" to me... are you suggesting that the English were "different" and had a "better" culture!!! my oh my such intolerance and bigotry! races are "GENES" or clusters of genes... genes are a determinant factor in intelligence and all other human traits ... so YES SILLY PANTS... far from being nonsense... its a truism...

excellent link... apparently the dregs of English society were able to build a civilization from scratch in all of 150 years.... Its quite amazing what afew generations of Europeans can do in a howling wilderness... while 60 000 years of existence for the aboriginals brought them........ um....... the didgeridoo... what an appalling record of iniquity... oh but don't you dare suggest that the Aboriginals where in any way shape or form "different" to the Europeans though... no no... that would be the height of "racism" and racism is the damnable wickedness (that only whites can be guilty of) which doubts the self evident fact that Europeans are a dumb gang of brutish melanin deficient cavemen who lack in spirituality and "earth new age values"...

If only you could read more attentively: I SAID CONTACTS WITH Chinese culture... and EXTENSIVE TRAVELS... are you willfully obtuse here? How is proof of a people walking their way towards the Deccan ( with no great civilization to boot mind you) somehow indicative of an intellectual equality with European? and what technical gap? on whose part? be clearer...

Aborigine "culture" far from being isolated: grew OUT of south east asia and spread over to the Deccan in southern india.... they had contact with chinese "culture" they traveled extensively... The aborigines (who's intelligence I will let you judge for yourself) from the fact that for the 60+ thousand years that they propagated themselves on Australia ... they never ONCE suspected that there MIGHT BE a causal relationship between sexual intercourse and pregnancy.. (in other words they never understood that sex = pregnancy)... IQ testing for Abo's also corroborate this Carlton S Coon, Bell Curve and others put their IQ at the lowest echelon... 63-65... higher only then Congo pygmies (who where discovered to have an average IQ of 60) They also (and you can find this out) FORGOT how to make 2 of their very few tools: canoes and bows... They forgot how to make canoes even though canoes gave them access to a type of fish which they considered to be the most delicious... They forgot bowcraft event though they needed this tool for effective fighting and effective hunting... And today its much the same Aboriginals in Australia are living in pestholes... and are quite incapable of integrating Australian society effectively... again the evidence is there for people willing to open their eyes... I mean just LOOK at them: http://www.crystalinks.com/aboriginals.jpg http://www.worldproutassembly.org/images/aborigines_5.jpg EQUALITY: Man's Most Dangerous Myth

OKay canadien, realize please that you conceded a moment ago that indeed a theory of genetic equality between every human is impossible. Notice also that we agreed that intelligence is also determined by ones genes as is clear from your unwillingness to say that we are all born with the same intelligence potential your precise quote again: "Who said everybody is born with the same intelligence?".... So how do you determine the "impossibility" of different genetic cluster groups (ie: races) who have all manner of genetic traits that CONSISTENTLY DIFFER (black skin for instance is not possible for nordic europeans) that these consistent and persistent genetic traits cannot also have implications for type and degree of intelligence? What you're saying is that one's genes does affect one's intelligence... but when it comes to different races ... we all have the same genes and hence potential for intelligence(?) if race has a persistent and predictable outcome as far as skin tone is concerned... why is it wise to assume it cannot have similar "consistency" and different "outcomes" when it concerns matters of intelligence? Especially when... as I said numerous time: the historical record (in terms of scientific achievement, IQ testing, looking at the status of regions in the world according to race) all confirm this as fact. now I realize that you will reject this out of hand or ignore it... because you will never accept this conclusion no matter how many incontrovertible facts supporting this are presented to you... You, (like the christian fundamentalists) believe in your doctrine of complete racial equality out of a catechism.. out of dogma .. and IN SPITE of reason and logic NOT BECAUSE of it. I bet you your response will include the following words: "nazi" "bigot" "hater" "fascist" "c*ap" "m*nure" etc ... and will avoid the subject ...

pffffffffffffffffffffffff HAHAHAHAHAAH !!!!!! a neo-nazi?... a talmud Jew.... Neo-Nazi!? a research compendium that denies any theory of White Racial superiority? that word gets flung around too often for it to have any real meaning... neonazi? a study taht concludes Asians to be the smartest average racial group? I mean cmon.... you're having a laugh aren't you! ... why don't you quote the Anti defamation League and other pseudo "human rights" advocates... you're quoting an unrecognized FAIR.org & Rolling Stones? What's their credibility in scientific literacy? be serious...

not by and for... Bell curve's chief of procedure was a Jewish man: Richard J. Herrnstein, and 2 blacks were contributors... And the fact that ASIANS are shown as the highest scorers in controlled tests (which completely puts the lie on the cross-cultural comparisons being somehow "invalid") should tell you something about the "bias" of the tests. And no single refutation has thus far been able to debunk the Bell Curve (many scoff at it and judgin by the liberal hate crazed response... there is no reason to trust in some of the more categorical refutations). Education is not only a product of how much money you parents make... most of today's geniuses (Epimethius Society, Helliq Society, Prometheus Society et al.) come form the middle class or ever poorer classes. Money and parent intelligence helps... but offers no guarantee. all liberals and thoughtless people like you can do .. is SAY: "oh... its not true... no valid "foundation""... as if you've said something profound and meaningful... pathetic...

I don't espouse fascism... but if you want to call preferring my culture and defending the people who created it "fascism" and if you call people who want to make a viable future for those people to grow "extremists"... then I am a fascist extremist and that is that... really nothing I said smacked of any established ideology. certainly not National Socialism (which is distinct somewhat from so-called "fascism")... Either way you completely refuse to enter debate and so its hard for me to discern what you mean by fascist... so far as I can tell you're just using words you know will antagonize people... all you do is fling words and label me... that's not exactly an intelligent tactic. If you want to debate the ethicacy or viability of Fascism as an ideology... that is an entirely different subject... If you want to respond to my previous statements of the existence of DIFFERENT and DIVERSE "races" or clines then by all means do so... otherwise what you say doesn't impose on anybody here with half a brain and used to such liberal mud slinging.. And to use a snippet from the Politically Correct verbiage index: you're comitting the liberal transgression of "STEREOTYPING ME" definition: "A stereotype is a phrase relating to all the members of class or set. The term is often used with a negative connotation when referring to an oversimplified, exaggerated, or demeaning assumption that a particular individual possesses the characteristics associated with the class due to his or her membership in it. Stereotypes can be used to deny individuals respect or legitimacy based on their membership in that group." so eat what we eat ...

cough cough, then why not slaughter another one ? Cmon it should be easy to gang up on a puny low IQ fascist ogre such as me who actually believes in the nobility of the Western world and its people. and how many millions of eminently disposable commies like you have been rightly given the "control + alt delete" treatment they so richly deserve? I'll be awaiting your next ad hominem angst laden post troll...

I assume the Sunshine trailer park and other rentable cottages surrounding the area will be suitably booked for the event..

managed to make 3 spelling mistakes here.... you can't even ignore me correctly... coward... scared of a little "spittling" fascist like moi...

I'd say the Multicultural act is probably the single worst "act" ever to disgrace Canada. It is the insane delusion that operates under the assumption that Cultural and Racial diversity is some sort of strength for canada... alas is the greatest source of tension and log rolling. It also supports an athmosphere of cultural relativism... Cultural relativism erroneously claims that each culture has its own distinct but equally valid mode of perception, thought, and choice. "Cultural relativism, the opposite of the idea that moral truth is universal and objective, assures us that there is no such thing as absolute right and wrong. There is only right and wrong as specified by the moral code of each society. Within a particular society, a standard of right and wrong can be inviolate. Cultural relativism maintains that man’s opinion within a given culture defines what is right and wrong".. which is what gives us the insane jokes of Sikh children with daggers in our schools, Punjabi RCMP officers who refuse to wear the traditional hat in lieu of their squalid and grotesque turbans... and it also gives us the obscene spectacle of Mulsim fundamentalists demanding sharia law be installed in muslim districts... Diversity is a Weakness, and this weakness comes from our strange support of multiculturalism...

Skin pigmentation? That's not all that race or "clines" are... you're quite wrong in saying that what affects the individual cannot afffect the group.. i don't know where you're getting the bundle of your ideas and notions... not only do you self contradict over and over again ( first saying race doesn't exist... then saying it does exist ... but doesn't do anything, then saying genes influence intelligence and physical aptitudes... but are irrelevant... that people are determined by their genetic makeup.. but its only individual).... more proof taht you're going out on a whim and don't know what you're talking about...

you like the words c*ap and horse m*nure don't you... obsessed with pooh... And i'm sorry but the Bell Curve and about 60 other controlled tests for IQ point to about the same gap in type and degree of intelligence and the break is along RACIAL LINES. There are many reasons to believe race and IQ are intricately linked, judging from the type of societies certain types of people create, judging from the crime stats in any given country or "diverse" area in a country (ie Detroit, South Central, Louisiana). I mean that actually isn't a single exception to the rule.. The most orderly and capable societies are the northern asiatic ones (who surpass our own in this respect)... and they consistently (and I stress consistently- show up an average IQ of 104 to 106 compared to our 100 or 101) Look at every tool of measurement for scientific literacy and mathematical literacy ... look at the very leftist and liberal OECD indexes of measurement (http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/edu_sci_lit-education-scientific-literacy) there isn't a single exception for the rule... so no... THERE IS EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE THAT RACE DOES HAVE A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP WITH IQ... the TESTING CERTAINLY SUGGESTS it does... history also points towards that direction, as does the record of technology and inventions... the illusion is that we're all precisely equal in all aspects of intelligence and applications of intelligence...

thank you then: the concept of heredity and cline and extended hereditary group (ie RACE) is indeed a valid and real notion... thank you for agreeing with EVERYTHING I've been saying... You really think intelligence is not highly influenced by characteristics inherited at birth? I agree that intelligence is also half nurture... as is everything, but to say that we are all born with the same intelligence and capacity for self discipline is just plain old liberal poppycock... its NONSENSE ON STILTS... We know for instance that many serial killers are BORN not BRED ... so clearly genes undoubtedly play a deciding role in EVERY human faculty.

What other website!?!? what are you even talking about... could you be less obvious in diverting the attention from the actual topic at hand? I mean you make it so easy to call you an intellectual coward.,.. unable to address the ISSUES of a debate: you ALWAYS put the onus back unto me personally .. what are you afraid of in debating rationally?

point out to A SINGLE aspect of my arguments which didn't make sense... please do just this for me... honestly I really want to know. and btw thank you for reminding me of what happens when a religious Egalitarian is forced to listen to an atheist of his creed (me), an ordeal that exposes a Liberal to the risk of thinking thoughts that would consign your ghost to eternal perdition... From all your rantings and flatly illogical hot air, I cannot determine whether any of you are Christian or Religious, but, unmistakably, you belong to the great Christian tradition which teaches Europeans to love everybody so much that they want to rip the guts out of everybody who doesn't love everybody as much as they do.

hurling ad hominems and never responding to legitimate questions and wasting your time talking to a "nazi" (!) shows that you're just reacting emotionally because you know you can't really enter debate and all you have left is childish insults.. also: describe "nazi"...

behold m.dancer the epicene homunculi (rational LIEberal-) incapable of shoring up any arguement to refute "fascistic" arguments made by a lowly right-winger.... NO NO: YOU SAID GENES ARE A PRODUCT OF "LOTTERY LUCK" and that genetic traits are impossible to cluster and predict.. If Shaq marries Oprah and then produces progeny- I bet you it won't turn out Like Lucy Liu or Conan Obrian... Though if race did'nt exist and genes determined by sheer chance... then you would have seen this happen MANY times already... alas you're just camouflaging your own BS argument: to make it appear as though you where talking about "race of parents"...

when you're ready to actually logically debate and show through A and B why an assertion of mine is incorrect or correct, i'll respond... so far all you do is SAY that my arguments are pooh pooh lies and nasty "fascism" ... without ever showing me HOW they are so... which amounts to ad hominem and is a logical fallacy.

no one is equal.. i'm not equal to you... and I'm not equal to anybody... nobody is equal to anyone.. two TWINS are not equal... the concept of "equality" is not possible in biology .. no two dogs are every precisely alike... even the ameabia differ ... that is the law of life.. the law of INEQUALITY is as immutable as the law of gravity.. you can like this fact or NOT LIKE this fact... it doesn't change anything.. I'd much prefer that we were all equal... but that would be infantile and self defeating (like belief in Jesus or Santa Clause)..

okay you've dropped the argument... you're all about ad hominem abusives now... model Egalitarian you are... let me try... is that because daddy used to sneak in your sheets at night M.Dancer? ... anyone as far to the left as you and as filled with the hatred of common sense must have gone through some traumatic stuff... its okay dancer... its not your fault... not your fault...

human procreation a "crap shoot"? how vulgar and ugly.. No MDancer... you said that traits "happen" as a result of lottery like luck... now for what you said to have any reasonable meaning: we would need to see black Shaquille Oneill type persons born to two asian parents... or similar fantastic impossibilities.. of course you just pretend to not see the simpering idiocy of your argument...