Jump to content

Moonbox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    10,268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    54

Everything posted by Moonbox

  1. Perhaps if you refused to acknowledge that Hamas was a terrorist organization that started a war it knew it couldn't win, and that Palestinian deaths and collateral damage was their goal, rather than a just an unfortunate consequence. Otherwise...no? Of course you have to sympathize with a child getting caught up in conflict, but when your children and loved ones are in danger from a terrorist organization bent on your people's destruction, they obviously don't give you neat and sterile options for dealing with them.
  2. Well it doesn't always go up. Sometimes it also goes down, and then it goes back up, and then it goes down. πŸ₯± I'm aware than the US Dollar index was 0.957 two years ago, and that it's 102.4 today, so whatever indeed. 🀣 Once again you have no idea what you're talking about and don't understand what any of the information you're pulling off your twitter feed.
  3. So when I say he's probably the worst PM we've ever had, it's because I actually secretly support him. I'm just deep-faking you or...something. That's so much sense!! 🀑
  4. Not only was one of the first things I said in this thread that Justin's done a brutal job as PM, I've also said many times he's probably the worst PM we've ever had. As usual, you're arguing with yourself. No wonder you think you've won so many debates. Your opponents are your own thoughts, in your own head. Again, only in your little imagination. πŸ™ƒ
  5. but more likely you'll get some emotional venting, and some canned insults. πŸ˜„
  6. The weirdest part about this line of reasoning is that I can't stand Trudeau and haven't ever said a good thing about him. Try something else. I'm over it. What about you? Does it upset you when someone points out that you're a no-life that spends all day, every day, arguing on the internet?
  7. 40 posts a day, every is indeed more than 3 lines. It's more than anyone has ever posted on this forum, ever. Saying that you have absolutely no life isn't complaining. It's stating an objective (albeit sad) fact. πŸ˜„ As for who makes who look like an 1diot, we can always go back to this gem of yours: Nobody spends more time insisting that he's won here than you. 🀑
  8. More than 3 lines? How do you tell people you have absolutely no life, no woman, no hobbies and no friends, without telling them that? 40 battle-posts on an internet forum, every day without fail. 🀣
  9. Only in your sad little imagination. Keep on arguing with yourself though if that's what helps you get through your obviously lonely day. πŸ˜†
  10. Concepts? Oh please, that's too funny. The simplification is for your own benefit. Everything fits into your comfy little reality when all questions can be answered with something something globalist woke elite WEF mind control vampires etc. 🀑
  11. Funny you should say that, given how you're ceaselessly re-arranging the same witless slogans. MSM woke apologist Liberal elites something something...blah blah blah WEF. The funniest thing about it is that you think you're actually saying something substantive. 🀑
  12. and there's my point! 1500 years or whatever after they were written, the Protestants decided that the Deuterocanonical Books didn't "appear" to be divinely inspired...anymore.
  13. Languages and ideas almost never, ever carry over with their full meaning and cultural context. For this reason alone, you'll never get a precise and literal translation from one language to the next. Beyond that, you have numerous books missing from all of the Protestant Bibles, but still included in the Catholic, Orthodox, Coptic Churches etc. Evidently, there was a revision in the Protestant faiths that decided that these books were not actually Divinely inspired, as had been believed for 1000+ years, but these other ones were.
  14. I don't need a "big comeback". Every time you launch into one of these farcical performances telling people how upset you've decided you're making them, everyone can see your fragile ego projecting. If it's always, always you bringing up emotions, hissy fits, butthurt and muffins etc, maybe the problem is you? 🀣
  15. My two sentence responses vs your multi-paragraph performances, but I'm the one making a fuss. There's that stunning lack of self-awareness again. Being elite and elitist aren't the same thing. There's no debate to have about. πŸ™ƒ
  16. You said he was elitist, which is pretty different than elite. Being elite is good. Being elitist is not. As for who's getting upset, it looks like you're reverting back to your programming and making up what you want to argue against, and how the other poster is feeling. If you want to argue with yourself, go for it. πŸ˜„πŸ‘Œ
  17. Yep, just a bunch of befuddled apes making loud noises. It doesn't matter what the issue or the topic is, it always goes back to green woke globalist msm-fake news Big Tech something something WEF.
  18. I'm saying that if you believe the Bible was written via Divine Revelation and that everything contained within is infallible, then it's pretty convenient that you also believe that the Church of England was divinely inspired to edit and remove the parts of the Bible they had previously accepted but now disagreed with. It's almost as if human beings were involved in deciding which parts of the Bible they believed, and which they didn't.
  19. Such deep thoughts. You missed a few off your list though. You still need to tick off: -Fascists (or Communists) -Something about the MSM and fake news -Big-Tech (or Big Pharma) Otherwise, that was a passable attempt at conspiracy donkey word-salad. 🀑
  20. You know what other nonsense very few people believe? The idea that the Church of England accepted that the old Bible was written through Divine Revelation, except for the parts that they didn't like! πŸ˜†
  21. Where did anyone, anywhere, say he was an average guy? He's one of the most respected financial minds in not just Canada, but the world. Calling that "elitism" is a pretty transparent attempt to frame his competence and success as something nefarious, but this sort of stuff is chicken-soup for the slogan-loving apes. Sounds to me like you're making up what you want to argue against again. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
  22. πŸ₯± Tell us more about how the WEF bad-man touched you Zeitgeist. 🀑
  23. Read it. I've also read War and Peace, which was actually a better historical/social commentary that Dickens'. Regardless, a basic knowledge of history prior to 1914 would firmly establish that the world was not "wonderful" prior to 1914.
  24. You're seeing all of this through an enthusiastic fan's eyes. Less of what he's shown us so far, more adult stuff, and you could be right. Doesn't seem like you know much at all. Calling him 'elitist' is a rather weak and meaningless emotional plea. Your claim that he's a tax-and-spend Liberal is also silly and I suspect based on nothing, particularly because he was never in charge of taxation or fiscal spending. That was the responsibility of the man who appointed him, Stephen Harper.
  25. Sorry to say, but I'm not reading your wall of text. The Belief that the Bible was a Divine Revelation is absurd. That counts doubly for the King James Bible you like to reference, which was commissioned by a King who liked to plow other dudes and was necessitated by the lifestyle choices of a previous king who decided that the sanctity of marriage was inconvenient for him. πŸ˜†
×
×
  • Create New...