Jump to content

Moonbox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    10,268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    54

Everything posted by Moonbox

  1. I don't know what's going to happen. What I do know, however, is that you've humiliated yourself once again gloating about something that never even happened, and you based it on a Youtube video you immediately and thoughtlessly believed because it's what you wanted to hear. Your ability to power through your own stupidity and ignorance is almost a superpower. ?
  2. No, they are not. Just like Hungary, they're using the whole situation to their advantage. They send weapons directly to Ukraine, then at the same time they're sending components to Russia.
  3. The problem with being a thoughtless twit that gets his news off his Youtube and Twitter feeds is that the algorithm recognizes that you're a thoughtless twit and feeds you thoughtless-twit content. Nope. You've been bamboozled again by troll-farm propaganda. The Iranians and North Koreans love minds like yours. ?
  4. It should be obvious, but only you were dumb enough to interpret it the way you did. ?
  5. Mikhail isn't even a real person. He's a paid Russian troll (or AI) and his posts are copy-pasted. No surprise you didn't realize that though. ?
  6. I understand that your fool brain thinks you're making some sort of point here, but there are two problems with it: 1) He definitely didn't say that, and the quote is right there above for anyone to see. His attempt to point out someone else's poor logic flies right over your head. 2) The thought is absurd at face value, and nobody would ever try to make it. Being the dumb little muppet that you are, however, here you are once again arguing with yourself about it. "NOoo! The French and the British were white! They were!" ??
  7. No we just don't think you have anything intelligent to say on the topic. Go wave your Bible around somewhere else.
  8. No muppet: "If the claim is that Russians helped found Canada simply on the basis of being early immigrants who contributed to the economy then you cant say Canada was founded by Whites because indigenous peoples and many early immigrants were non-white and also contributed. Get it?" Dumb dumb dumb. ?
  9. No, muppet. This is really basic logic. If someone says: If A is true, then B cannot be true. You can't separate these two ideas and quote the person and say they're claiming only B. I mean, you can, but you find new ways to make yourself look like a fool every day. ?
  10. he says, after uselessly quoting me with a troll post in a conversation he wasn't part of, in his +11000th this year. Dumb dumb dumb. ?
  11. When a sentence starts with "if", that clues most people into the conditional nature of the subsequent statement. Removing the condition from a conditional statement and then saying it's not changed is...retarded. It's like you're going out of your way to prove your low IQ.
  12. It was only half the sentence, and omitting the first half changed the meaning of the statement entirely. Once again, you're arguing against a statement that was never intended and is absurd at face value, but you're so belligerently stupid it doesn't register. Here you are again, arguing with yourself. ?
  13. It was one sentence and your quote didn't even include the first half of it. Even when you're being dishonest, you're too stupid to pull it off properly. ??
  14. Yes, yes, sealioning, the limp cry of an angry ranter getting caught bullshitting again. ? Hilariously (and predictably pathetically), you omitted the full context of the quote: "If the claim is that Russians helped found Canada simply on the basis of being early immigrants who contributed to the economy then you can”t say Canada was founded by Whites because indigenous peoples and many early immigrants were non-white and also contributed. Get it?" He's demonstrating someone else's bad logic, as in "If A is true, then B cannot be true". I would say you knew what you're doing when you misquoted, given your history of dishonesty, but you might actually be too dumb to have understood anyway. ??
  15. If he was saying that, surely you could quote him doing that, right? You can't though, because you're a sad little muppet who just argues with himself about points you make up yourself. ?
  16. Wait, so was beave saying that the French and the British weren't white? Once again, muppet, you're arguing with yourself. Dumb dumb dumb.
  17. Not even 5% as much as you, no-life. Why are you following me, by the way? ?
  18. If you have a reasonable question then don't bury it in a multi-paragraph wall of hyperbole. I already told you I stopped reading when you were telling us about how the climate alarmists want us all to go live in caves. ? There are plenty of climate alarmists out there. There are also a lot of denialists, flat-earthers, conspiracy kooks etc. Gad Saad is smart enough to understand how effective hyperbole can be in riling up susceptible minds. He didn't write that piece to convince anyone of anything. It was nothing but a hot-take to reassure people like you of how you already feel. ?
  19. More likely just another paid Russian troll/bot. When you see a brand new poster with a hot-take like this, chances are this is exactly what you're looking at. This sort of moronic race-baiting trash is worth no attention, and only the truly feeble-minded bite on it. See: ?
  20. and yet...here I am not running away. ? Somewhere along the way to your 30th thread complaining about the muslims/blacks/woke/trannies/environmentalists, you painted a good picture of what informs and motivates your..."ideas". Reasonable, cool-headed people looking for intelligent discussion don't start threads with hysterical titles like, "Progressive diversity cult is killing the western world", or suggest that "climate alarmists" want to shut down all industry and make everyone live in caves. How oblivious can you be?
  21. Before Trump, emotional online venting was already thing, as were close-minded bigots and thinly-disguised racists. ?‍♂️
  22. The only thing that's pretend is the idea that Kiev wasn't their primary objective in the first place. This was a large-scale combined-arms offensive meant to knock out Ukrainian leadership and command and control, American-style. Russia's army is run by cronies and made up of peasant soldiers, however, so it was a humiliating failure in which they took enormous losses. You don't paradrop your most elite airborne divisions 100 km behind enemy lines for a feint.
  23. I'm no sure I'd call him salvageable. You don't have to be an addled conspiracy donkey or completely desocialized to be a lost cause. There are plenty of otherwise reasonable and intelligent people who lack the emotional maturity and self-awareness to accept challenges to their viewpoints. I don't think he's an anomaly. His attitudes are a dime a dozen.
  24. Of course you're not listening. You're way too busy working yourself up and posting goofy hyperbole to describe the outrage you feel over...other people's outrage. ? The progressive diversity cult...hahaha. That's so perfectly encapsulates your downward spiral here. ?
  25. and this is why you're not worth any serious attention here. You can't (or won't) articulate a point without defaulting back to your lazy heuristics, slogans and hyperbole. I'm not even going to read the rest of that wall of text you pounded out, because I got the gist of it from your opening line. ?
×
×
  • Create New...