Moonbox

K. If you're talking about the collapse of Canada/US everyone, there's really not much to discuss. Yes, but your fishing license isn't going to pay your local bureaucracy...unless you want the price to go up alot!

It's not that far away. 🫤

Yeah, you pick the truthiest, most smartest experts...the ones who validate your rage. 🤡

That's nonsense, and will never happen. Okay? So what?

You can insist and insist as much as you want on what you want the argument to be about, but you're just making it up again. It's a given that you have so little going on in your life that maintaining a half dozen of these belligerent arguments seems like a good use of time, but you're also obviously too dumb to even remember what the debate was even about. 🤡

It's literally right above this quote. ARF ARF ARF ARF. CdnFox can add champion Sealion to his dubious list of King Loser qualities. 🤡

It should be, but then you're too belligerent and too stupid to let it be. There's me clarifying my position, and not for the first time in this thread. For someone who likes to squawk about Sealioning, nobody does it better than you.

That's a self-evident absurdity though. Take the idea to it's logical conclusion and you'll have a mayor for every few square miles, governing jurisdictions of only a few people. Sounds dumb, right? There are a great many issues that can't be looked after locally. The question is then what things should be decided locally, and then how are funds raised for that?

I'm saying laziness is one of many reasons. There are lots of others. Rest assured it's not because all the Facebook Karens who did their own research convinced them via quackery.

Just like how so many folk don't play a sport or go to the gym as soon as highschool is over. It's not because they think exercise is bad. It's because they're lazy. 🙃

Nope. That's not my claim at all. My claim is that it's possible to believe something is a good idea, but that people still might not do them for all sorts of reasons. You probably believe that exercise is a good idea, but you still spend 16 hours a day glued to your chair arguing on the internet. Get it? 🤡 Once again, you're just arguing with yourself.

Because I can't quote myself not saying the things you make up. That's basic logic. If you're too stupid to understand and concede even that point, congratulations! You've proven you're one of the dumbest people to ever grace this forum. 🤣

Yeah I don't really understand what you're saying here at all. 🤷‍♂️

Yeah, we concluded that you made it up! You spent the last 2 pages of this thread trying to explain why you won't (read can't) provide the quote, and now you want to move on. Spasming out in more paragraphs of written puke doesn't change that you were caught lying and bullshitting...AGAIN! 🤡

Nope. That's just you making up what you want to argue against...again! Too dumb to argue against anyone else, CdnFox can only argue against himself! Who will win? CdnFox, "Loser of the Year" or CdnFox "Fullretard strawman"? Even odds, I'd say.

Aww...muffin. Why are you talking about polls and prevailing attitudes when there are no actual polls? Is it because you're cluelessly bullshitting again? Getting the vaccines and thinking the vaccines are good idea are not the same thing. 🤡

This is what you were claiming: This was a fantasy argument you invented to argue against, because you're too dumb to argue with anyone but yourself. Whatever question you may or may not have asked was probably lost amidst you soiling yourself with pages of worthless rant-spam nobody reads. As for the eventual question itself, now you're the one sealioning, LOL. Refer back to:

Ever heard of elections? That doesn't exist.

It gets a lot of money from the UN, the UAE and other muslim states, and let's not forget all the funding from Iran.

I have clarified my position. It's that the effects of carbon taxes on inflation are grossly exaggerated by know-nothing clowns like you. It was my first post in this thread. I've reiterated it several times. The fact is that even in light of that clarification, you're so tragically stupid that you kept going back to argue against the point you made up, that someone somewhere ever argued that taxes don't increase costs/prices. This summarizes pretty much every debate anyone has here with you. You're literally too dumb to argue with anyone but yourself.

What monopoly is that? On job positions? Private sector still has plenty open...the public sector doesn't. What does that tell you? Who said anything about the decision makers being special?

What polls are those? Do you have some new polling that folks (and the medical community) have reversed their thinking on vaccines? Or...are you just cluelessly bullshitting again?

That's exactly how it works, unless you're an absolute fool and live in clownworld. Proof is always on the affirmative, rather than the negative. If you claim I said something, you need to prove it. I can't quote myself not saying it. Way to tell us you never received a higher education without actually saying it. No Education, Employment or Training. CdnFox - Re:Politic's resident N.E.E.T. I didn't say it, so I couldn't have meant it. 🤡

When the problem is too many underperforming and overpaid public servants, and the militant public sector union monopolies and a government that panders to them, you think that adding layers of bureaucracy is going to improve the situation? I agree with this, but when you have ironclad job security and a sweetheart CBA that ensures you never have to do more than the absolute bare minimum, the decision making priorities are how to maintain the status quo rather than actually improving outcomes.

If you're claiming I said something, you have to prove. That's how logic and reason work, muppet-brain. Having a seizure and compulsively spamming emojis doesn't cut it.