Moonbox

Is that so? It's ALL because of the Olympics? What are you basing that on?

It's an anecdotal article written by a member of the Liberal Party. It's completely biased. As for what's not true, let's instead look at the balogna in the article. First, he says the Liberals like to cut corporate taxes only when the government is running surpluses. That's fine and dandy, but what happens when they are running deficits? Do you raise corporate taxes when you run deficits, or stick to tax cuts previously made? The idiot goes so far to suggest that it was smart to support tax cuts in 2007 because we were still running a surplus, but that was right before the recession (and subsequent deficits) so I can't understand how this clown's logic could be so selective. As for the F-35, I'm kind of in agreement with him, but that's another story altogether.

Hahahahahahahahaha **gasps for air** Hahahahahahahahaha

Is it wrong for me to judge May on her slob appearance? Who wants that leading their country?

LoL Topaz you would be lurking around rabble.ca

Everything within reason. Moderation is a really nice thing. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here man.

Madmax asserted that the NDP has a better record running balanced budgets provincially. Bob Rae was M.Dancer's refutation of that and it was fairly apt. madmax has decided that Bob Rae doesn't count, but I'm having trouble understanding why. Sounds like he's cherry picking the sample.

Why do people even respond to these threads? That's the more intriguing topic to discuss....

Topaz you're so out of touch. Harper is polling better in Ontario than he ever has at 44%. Dalton the mistake has p'd off so many people here that it's going to be a completely blue province again by the end of the year. Check your facts again.

Do you think the Liberals would have done any better sending planes to Libya to "buy votes"? Topaz your posting here has become pretty sad lately.

The baby is going to die. Tax dollars should not be wasted on parents in denial. This is sad, yes. It's not a nice story. If the parents want to cross the border and waste their money on American doctors, let them.

South Korea is not a poor country. It's also a much smaller country and thus the infrastructure is a lot cheaper to put together. With that said, it's not 100x more expensive to put together here, particularly if you live in southern ontario. We're getting totally fleeced here in Canada.

It is a cesspool of lies. Anyone who doesn't see it is fooling themselves.

Completely incorrect. There is not a single nation in the world that could afford the losses you'd see in a large scale conventional war like WWII. The USA knows this and this is why they have tens of thousands of retired planes arranged in rows in the desert. We'll likely never see another conflict like WWII, but if we did, it wouldn't be fought by F-35's. It'd be fought by F-16's at best, but more likely Voodoos, Starfighters or even P51's lol.

That sums up how I feel about the plane, but I've spent enough time on this thread explaining that lol

Please everyone, don't respond to this thread. You only give him validation....

Well I completely agree with you. Fudged just seemed like a fun word to use.

Well you brought it up in a Bev Oda thread so reason would dictate you were relating them somehow.... Ah I see. Does what Paulie D had for breakfest gain immediate traction because it goes on Twitter? Unexciting news is still unexciting news. Twitter is just an outlet for it. You're a real champion of logical fallacy. Keep up the good work Shwa.

I can't really agree with you here. Yes, she got it right, but she didn't have to fudge the documents. I can't even begin to understand why she did. She'd probably have been applauded for the decision itself. Why did she have to be underhanded about it? I already don't trust the government enough.

McGuinty's green energy incentives were nothing more than a pander to Ontario farmers. Farmers who build solar panels on their properties are guaranteed rates something between 10-80 times more expensive than conventional energy. There's NOTHING green about impractically expensive energy. Hell, if that's what we're going to do, why don't we just spend a couple hundred billion on a fusion reactor that will produce 1.000000000001 x more energy than it consumes. That's clean too you know....

Hahahahaaha. There's a red herring if I've ever seen one. It takes a really special sort of intellect to compare an Egyptian uprising to Bev Oda lol.

UBB is fine. You can set a per GB cost to the internet and it would be just as fair as the package fees. The problem with UBB is the over-limit traps the ISP's are setting and how shadily that's being done. Network congestion isn't a completely made up issue, but the ISP's are definetely blowing it out of proportion. The real issue here isn't anything but our ISP's trying, any way they can, to rip us off. Our government has thus far done shit all to protect us and we have some of the worst internet on the planet for what we pay because of it. The Americans, who usually don't bother paying attention to us, are even weighing in on the fiasco.

Yes I know all about the BNAA. I'm also in complete agreement that we're better off with a constitution of some sort. I do, however, think that there is a large number of people who abuse the constitution and distort it to their own uses in a scope well beyond what it was originally intended to do.

Haha Smallc. 10 points sir.

Read his post again: the people who make a journalistic or board career of attacking Canada, the U.S. and Israel It's really irrelevant what they accept. Israel doesn't need anyone to BELIEVE they feel threatened in order to feel threatened and take steps to protect themselves. A lot of the legitimacy for the Israeli position comes from the fact that its neighbours are all human rights catastrophes and because we have a fairly long history of attacks, threats and aggression against Israel to back it up. Wikileaks video of Apache mowing down people in the street. Very embarrassing. Possibly taken VERY out of context. What sort of debating tactic is this? Would you not agree that the US, Canada etc are criticized for their environmental policies? Did you follow any of the coverage on Copenhagen? Have you seen how much flak Canada takes for killing baby seals? Do us the favor and stop playing dumb. It doesn't take an epic mental effort to look these sorts of things up yourself, and nobody wants to have to cite every single statement they make.