Moonbox

Yeah man...totally. The right never complains about protests. ? I've never seen anyone whinging about tree huggers, Green Peace, BLM etc. "...but but the Right doesn't disturb the peace when they protest (or I justify it when they do, because I agree with them) and it's always the LEFT that causes problems." Real great take there Groot. ?

Protests are confrontational by their nature. As for masks, the leader of the anti-tranny protests has threatened that they're going to take names and retaliate against counter-protestors. Duh. As for irony, just review your thread title. You cannot have dialogue with (people who disagree with me) is nothing more than reassuring yourself of your own biases, especially when it's painted in such broad strokes.

Who you do or don't recognize as Canadian counts for less than nothing. Whether he was a good Canadian, a bad Canadian, or not even a Canadian at all, foreign agents murdering people in Canada should be the problem we're talking about. If you're unhappy about Chinese interference in Canadian politics, I don't understand how you can turn around here and prevaricate on India murdering people in broad daylight on Canadian soil. It's weird.

Do you not see any irony in your thread title, and OP?

Hovering over your name and then greenshotting and editing it is rambling? I could do it 40 more times and it would still only be a fraction of the time you waste here on any given day. You're an examplar of the angry internet NEET.

...and on-queue, you provide another spastic, rambling response to my one-liner. ?

Why would I be offended? I'm just pointing out what an angry deadbeat you are. Even when someone's posting respectfully, your default-state response is being a belligerent jackass. Speaking of pathetic: What personal trauma led to this? ?

Saudi Arabia never had the best interests of the US in mind. This is a fundamentalist theocracy - based on Islamic Law. Security for keeping the oil flowing was never more than a mutually beneficial arrangement. The media does pay attention to Saudi Arabian developments and its worsening relationship with the US. It reports on it regularly and 5 second google search would offer you dozens of articles on it from every major US newspaper. You would know that if you didn't get all of your news off of Twitter and you actually knew anything about the world beyond that. ?

That wasn't sealioning. Your arguments here on this topic are nonsense. It's the left's fault that this guy killed Muslims while ranting batshit right wing conspiracy theories, because Hilary said "deplorables" ?? ? Mandy didn't say anything rude to you here, but you offered this belligerent response nonetheless. How fitting.

Always funny watching you spit out boiler-plate conspiracy slogans. ?

Awkward....

We've heard this before from you. Last time you were telling us to wait for the end of January 2023. ? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about - just another mindless twitter zombie, trawling for doom-porn.

Investors would have made more money buying the S&P 500 than following Michael Burry's stock-market warnings, said Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at Creative Planning. The index had an "average 6-month annualized gain of 34%" in the periods following a selection of 2019-2023 Burry tweets, he said. "Don't make changes in your portfolio based on a tweet," he said in a post on X. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-big-short-michael-burry-tweets-sp-500-investors-2023-9 Michael Burry Michael Burry Michael Burry. Sorry Sharkman. Don't base your worldview on tweets. ?

Nobody can string together right-wing buzzwords like you. Marxis-Nihilist-Groomers! LOL! ?

A dubious conclusion based on nothing but your random musings. The wide disparity in wealth by state within the US should throw your conclusion out the door, but you're working backwards here. You formed your conclusion to start, and now you're just looking for whatever you can find to fit it.

I can equally argue that countries with small populations are often poor. The correlation you draw is a rather useless observation, beyond the obvious reality that overpopulation beyond what resources can support is bad.

Saudi Arabia is OPEC's most important member. Russia has been cooperating with them for decades on rigging oil prices. Nope, lol. Go review how much the BRICS (barring Russia) trade with the US, vs amongst each other. Once again you're hilariously uninformed - a twitter zombie parroting whatever's showing up on your feed lately. Michael Burry Michael Burry. Dumb.

WEF is real. It's just not what you've deluded yourself into thinking it is. The Saudi and Russian oil move? What about this do you figure is novel, or new? They've been increasing and decreasing oil production to manipulate prices for longer than I've been alive. OPEC is an oil cartel, and keeping prices artificially high is what they do. ?

Fifteen minute cities, electronic tracking microchips, mind-control vampires from Zeta-Reticuli AND quantum computers something something WEF. ?

Who said it was irrelevant? ?

Your argument is wrong, and you can go look at places like Mongolia or, say, Nauru to show you how wrong it is.

Because the referendum was run by the Russians, and a Russian-run vote is about as worthwhile as it is in North Korea. The result is the same every time, no matter what. Putin/Great Leader wins every time. How dumb are you to believe this is worth anything?

Yes they did, smooth-brain. Russian troops were on the ground, supported by Russian tanks, Russian missile launchers, Russian helicopters etc. That's why the referendums were discredited around the world. Nobody acknowledged them as legit, because the conditions for a legitimate referendum were impossible. It's hard to understate how absent your critical thinking skills are. There are few people on this forum less capable of original thought than you. You don't do anything but repeat what the clowns you follow on youtube say, and as long as it's something you LIKE, then that's your reality, no matter how ****ing nonsensical it is.

Nobody cares if you disagree "strongly". You're not making an articulate argument.

Zelensky, brainlet. You've been calling Zelensky a Nazi the whole time, which is awkward because he's a Jew. They held a referendum under Russian occupation. Russia doesn't hold free elections for their own people, so in what bizarre clownworld do you suppose they're holding free elections in occupied Ukrainian territory? The 2020 US election was stolen, according to Nationalist, but referendums in territories under armed occupation by repressive dictatorships are TOTALLY LEGIT. This is the sort of assbrain logic you deliver daily here.