scribblet

I hope she does go after them as there was no reason for manhandling her like that. She also denies that she is a member of some 'far right' group, I also think there's a lot more in the French media we don't see. What about the $164 million that's been spent on illegal immigrants so far? - is not a racist question and how Trudeau plans to finance this ongoing situation is something provinces would like to know too. Saw this on twitter: Woman Trudeau insulted/harassed is a 74 year old retired nurse Says she went to the event after seeing an ad in the paper & that she has never been a spokesperson for the group Storm Alliance as alleged. English translation of the event is not accurate IMO but Would MSM spin?

Hungary and Poland have rejected Soros funding etc.

They are right, he did sound crazy, maybe he needs more time off. Certainly it is Trudeau who needs a wedge issue in order to frame the election campaign in his preferred terms eg "enlightened" vs the "bigots". It is divisive and offensive but serves his purpose, one which much of the media caters to.

He was very derogatory only giving liberal talking points as answers. I sure agree with Michelle Rempel's call for civility, which, sorry to say, doesn't fit withTrudeau's plan. As she said, "I don't expect to be labelled with some sort of disparaging remark when I stand up in the House of Commons and ask ... how much something is going to cost." Calling someone a racist or bigot is nothing but an attempt to end the debate. It is necessary to have a debate on a Immigration whichis a matter of public policy so a cost/benefit analysis is more than appropriate and should not be deemed racist.

I don't think immigration was out of control under previous gov'ts for the most part, at least they brought most in under the merit system and I'm pretty sure Harper actually reduced family reunification, which Trudeau is going increase greatly, costing our medical system for sure. Totally agree that democracy and freedom of speech is under siege, more so than ever under the Trudeau regime. They could not have known at the time of the incident who the woman is and what groups she allegedly belongs to, but the demonizing of anyone questioning Trudeau is well under way. Even if they did know her name and that she was going to be at this rally, her question of fiscal responsibility was a valid one, the same question some provinces are asking. Andrew Scheer is now under attack for speaking out against Trudeau's comments as some believe he (and Trudeau) did know who she was. It's amazing how the media are blowing this up into everyone is a racist for not agreeing with Trudeau. As Trudeau beats the drum of diversity and open borders, he is dividing the country into those who vote Liberal, and those he labels as racist etc. This is the Liberal campaign strategy, this is the wedge issue – We, the Canadian voters are the wedge issue.

Transcript here https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tranlation-transcription-trudeau-heckler-video-1.4793229?cmp=rss as usual she got bafflegab for an answer

Well said... Bernier is addressing it and Scheer has come out on twitter against it, but is it enough, can the Trudeau and their One World Order be stopped? The thing is Trudeau's pushing and defending illegal border crossing has turned people against a well administered legal immigration system.

Now that Scheer has brought this out into the open it's for a full out discussion by MPs et al as to why it's racist or intolerant to question fiscal responsibility #4 from Scheer Andrew Scheer‏Verified account @AndrewScheer 15h15 hours ago More This is a calculated Liberal strategy to avoid accountability and shut down legitimate criticism of their appalling record. 4/5

Considering the state of our health care and the enormous burden allready placed on it via illegal migrants coming in, it is a necessary policy.

Good point. Fortunately I haven't been through that, but find that, to put it mildly, our system is severely lacking.

We don't know if she belonged to any group, but even if she did, her question of financing was perfectly legitimate and definitely not racist but this is how Trudeau rolls. Anyone who questions his policies will be 'intolerant, racist, bigoted and of course hate speech' etc. etc. We also need to know if the guy who strong armed her was actually RCMP or just hired security goons. This from Andrew Scheer who is right on this. This is how you can tell when Liberals are losing. Concerned about illegal border crossers? You’re a racist. Worried about the cost? You’re un-Canadian. Don’t like the carbon tax? You’re a denier. Canadians are sick and tired of this. 3/5

https://www.spencerfernando.com/2018/08/20/trudeau-is-laying-the-groundwork-to-criminalize-his-political-opposition/ Is Trudeau laying the ground word to criminalize the opposition -- Very un-prime ministerial of Trudeau to inflame the situation rather than answer the perfectly legitimate question being asked by the Governments of QC, Ontario and Manitoba

The first refuge of a scoundrel is to label a perfectly legitimate question "racist" What is disgusting is Trudeau saying that the questioning of the cost Of Illegal Border Crossers Is "Hate Speech". As per N. Specter... QCois de souche came much later -- first question that Trudeau avoided answering and chose to inflame -- was perfectly legitimate and is the same question being asked by the Governments of Ontario, QC and Manitoba

Just to say: why do people use that instead of who.

Boy, don't get me going on our health care system ( or lack there of)

I like this one, reminds me of that British series Life on mars...

Exactly! Liberals are desperately trying to spin her as being part of some 'far right group', but we have no confirmation. Even if she was, all she did was ask him about his financial responsibility on this issue, but all she got for that was a dressing down about being racist. So even questioning liberal financial responsibility is now racist, Trudeau: "A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian!" Quebecois woman who has lived here all her life: "I'm not happy with the $146M you've spent on the illegal migrant crisis you created" Trudeau: "YOU HAVE NO PLACE IN CANADA!" Sure, anyone disagreeing with Trudeau has no place in Canada...

More like they happen 'organically', in all the developments I've quoted they are specific in their needs and requirements, apparently only Quebec says no.

Nobody has said that, if Christians did it here I'm sure it would be decried, but no one wants to decry or accept that Muslims are doing it. They did want to dictate dress as the link told us which was one of the reasons the development was turned down (in Quebec). I believe it is now on hold because of it's requirements etc. BTW, another person turned away from faith based subsidized housing https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/woman-upset-after-being-turned-away-from-faith-affiliated-social-housing-building-1.2533277

I don't think Christians should keep others out but the original link was in the U.S. not Canada, I'm pretty sure it would be illegal here. Meanwhile, you cast aspersions on me by suggesting I'm not telling the truth - I am reporting when is reported in the news - Muslim only communities. If it doesn't stand up to the Constitutional test that's another issue but you cannot deny that these communities were and are being built for a specific group of people - all others not welcome, and I'd bet in particular Jewish people, but that's just my opinion.

Not sure why you are in denial, but in one link I provided it stated: "In the houses, kitchens were fitted with powerful fans because most of the community likes to cook aromatic food. And given that Ahmadiyya Muslims are conservative about sex roles, houses were built with two living rooms — one for men, the other for women. Most home buyers in Peace Village have come from a Toronto community of about 30,000 Ahmadiyyas." It is a village built for Muslims. The development in Montreal I provided a link for was for Muslims only including Sharia mortgages and residents must adhere to Muslim values (modest dress etc.) but was turned down because it was not inclusive.

Mission Impossible Fallout. Pretty good, lots of action, no swearing or semi porn, just entertainment.

Exactly, and this was subsidized housing so surprising that they are allowed to discriminate.