Merlin

I have an Android phone.

You're supposed to be snipping posts to only include the portion of the post you're directly responding to. It's improper forum etiquette to leave an entire huge post in your quote. American Woman, it's annoying to be reading a thread then all of a sudden we have 12 short posts in a row with one sentence answers. These would be easier to read if these were condensed into one post instead of spreading them out over a page and a half.

Conservatives believe that people should do for themselves. Left wingers believe that someone else should do for them. Different mindsets.

Perhaps too many straight people are choosing to live a gay lifestyle by choice. Let's be honest here I've seen lots of people who seem straight but lead a gay lifestyle by choice, it is happening everyday.

So then this motion should pass through the House easily with every party supporting it.

The bill calls for official condemnation of sex selection abortions, that's it. Nothing else. Who could possibly be in favor of sex selection abortions? This isn't a law, it doesn't put any limits on abortion, nothing like that just an official condemnation of the practice of sex selection abortions. Harmless.

Day after day I have to read several posts in a row in the same thread by the same poster. These people are not using the "Multiquote" button and are spamming the forums. I'm not sure if it's a tactic in order to inflate their post count or what it is. This multiquote button is used to use one post to respond to to several posts at the same time, saving the forums resources and the readers patience at the same time. There are several posters who are doing this, it isn't just one poster. edit- I've also noticed people aren't snipping their posts as they are supposed to. Wastes resources and makes it hard to read.

Cybercoma there is a multi quote button, you don't need to make separate posts each time.

How is making it illegal to kill babies based on gender making all abortions illegal? Some, like the above poster are trying to make the claim. Yes, swearing at people is a great way to help the dialogue along. We put limits on many things in society so why not this? It seems to be the same thing to me.

I don't see a connection between wanting to eliminate sex selection(killing female babies) and making abortion illegal. One has nothing to do with the other.

Maybe she's read your posts on here and thought you were a special person.

We need more planes. What's important is that Canada is going to get them. Our air force deserves the very best equipment we can get for it, whatever shape that takes, so be it. Our pilots deserve to fly the best equipment we can get them. Let's rally behind our troops and support them instead of trying to drag them down.

So you're ok with women aborting a baby, killing it, at 8 or nine months pregnant? This is acceptable to you?

Yes, you should be praising him as he is doing as you and your kind have asked him to do. It's a great victory for the left, it must feel wonderful.

I see nothing wrong with having some limits on abortion.

This is a source of pride for the left? To be mentioned in the same sentence as those two wonderful nations, those bastions of freedom?

I'm surprised that people are who are on the left aren't singing the praises of the Harper government. They've been screaming about wanting this for months, maybe years and it's happened now. The left wing supporters here should be dancing in the streets, I don't understand why they aren't.

There are no such laws in Canada. It's perfectly legal to have an abortion in Canada in the last trimester. There is no law against it, no restriction whatsoever. Anytime anyone brings it up people scream, so the result is that we're one of the only nations to have ZERO restrictions on abortion.

What we can afford, do the job and last a long time.

It's important for the government to only make decisions after having all the information.

Will you support the rebels even if they want to install a radical Islamic government that wants to rule with Sharia Law and views the west as the enemy?

She's reasonable but I'm not sure she has the political experience. Only an MP for 4 years. But I dig her so she may be the dark horse.