socialist

FYI, the CBC isn't the only station Canadians view.

Yes , I have seen them on TV, as I said in my OP. Any other questions?

Has anyone else seen this pro-CBC ad on TV? I've seen it a few times. It goes along with what I've been saying all along in that the CBC is heavily invested in defeating Harper. They have an agenda, and this is one very plain reason why we cannot trust the CBC during this election. https://www.straight.com/blogra/513221/friends-canadian-broadcasting-takes-aim-harper-conservatives-pro-cbc-campaign

What do you think?

Your tin foil hat is pulled down a little too low.

This doesn't make any sense.

With the stock market situation, not many really care about this ridiculous trial anymore, except for a few hyper-partisans that reside on this forum.

I never heard of Josh Duggar until I read your obsessive rants. All you are doing is promoting your own self-righteousness. Duggar is a hypocrite....so what? The world is full of hypocrites from every walk of life.

I simply provided a link that mentioned a name. I'm not relishing or getting my jollies from it like kimmy did.

Oh well, I guess we disagree. I'm really not concerned about it. People like to respond to him, even his most ardent accusers, so in reality, I don't see a troll.

Not at all. I find BC entertaining. That's my opinion, and if that makes me a troll, then so be it.

A few years. I honestly believe people like you can seethe brilliance in his posts. It's takes a keen eye and a sharp mind.

Personally, I see absolutely nothing wrong with BC's posts. I don't think a majority can understand the points he makes, so in their simple minds it coms across as trolling.

Well, I had my suspicions, but now I know it's a fact that you cannot be taken seriously.

I can't believe that members of the Canadian House of Lords used this dubious service. http://www.ottawasun.com/2015/08/22/leaked-ashley-madison-name-matches-senators

No one is asking the NDP questions that need to be asked. $15/day daycare will quickly increase costs because you can guarantee the unions are looking to unionize all the daycare workers.

The problem is that the MSM has overblown the situtaion and the lemmings simply follow, as we can say on this forum.

What makes people think only Perrin was honest? Perrin made some strange statements, saying on the one hand today that his role in the Duffy deal were very minimum, but at the other hand claiming that he knew exactly what the 'good to go' comment referred to and that Wright was speaking on Harper's behalf in regards to Wright's payment, but that was not true, and secondly, Perrin was never present when Wright spoke to Harper. Also, today the RCMP statement revealed that Perrin had said to the RCMP that he did not know when Novak had entered the room. So, I think if you put doubt in Wright's statement (if that is what you are implying) then I would urge you to have a look at Perrin's testimony and what was really said.

The NDP, the oh so innocent NDP. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/ndp-mp-pat-martin-used-donations-unions-pay-210359545.html

Speculation on my part: what if Perrin BELIEVED he knew what the 'good to go' comment referred to only because he wanted to believe that Wright had acted on Harper's behalf only because Perrin had said that the Wright payment was not illegal, thinking Harper would have approved. Now, Harper said he did not know and would not have approved, what then to think of Perrin's 'permission' that the Wright payment was legit? Just saying. It seemed weird that Perrin remembered so vividly that part he wanted to tell, that part when he believed the PM was aware and that Wright was supposedly fully acting on Harper's behalf?