Leafless

The corrupt application of bilingual and linguistic policies does not equate to equal rights. I promote policies to protect charter rights and the historical language rights of the English speaking majority of Ontario. Ontario to date is a province that refuses to protect the free flowing historical linguistic rights of majority English speaking Ontarians. If you read the thread you will observe that I have already donated.

Fact is, you are, according to you, a Francophone Ontarian who advocates or approves of corrupt, discriminatory linguistc bilingual policies or corrupt bilingual sign laws without a municipal or provincial referendum on the issue. This is of course in a province that has NO official language policy. Relax CANADIEN and allow others to freely voice their opinion in a country that is so culturally lax that it cannot even define what a Canadian is or what their nationalistic or patriotic obligations are as a Canadian citizen to the country of Canada.

The U.S. does not have to reveal what evidence they have against Mr. Arar. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/04/16/...-us-ban016.html Besides, a royal commision is not a court of law.

It is no myth. English is universal in comparison to what any other language is going to, or can achieve relating to world wide linguistic universality.

At last we have a potential Conservative leader that recognizes McGuinty,s nanny state Ontario is destroying the province as well as discriminating against other cultures. And then we have have Madeleine Meilleur, the Liberal minister responsible for francophone affairs who says: Madeleine Meilleur worried about assimilation after English speaking Canadians have been forced fed French via French cultural imperialism by way of the Charter and French related federal policies. Lol' lol, lol. Please give me a break. Go Randy go! http://www.canada.com/Life/Hillier+puts+Fr...6292/story.html

You franco,s are all the same!

Please identify the facts associated with this thread you wish to discuss.

What part of the "very foundation" of our Constitution are you referring to that I am opposed to? I don't exactly know what point I am side stepping unless you tell me.

I am in favour of totally scrapping the corrupt, discriminatory Charter for reasons I have previously posted. So have all other Canadians, within that time frame, who have grew up with (not constitutionally enshrined) federal and provincial bill of rights prior to the corrupt Charter. Amazing isn't it. We had no role in British constitutional development. We inherited the rights granted to all British imperial subjects by the constitutionally-limited monarchy of Queen Victoria, the individual rights that Britons had won after 600 years of political & military battle. But lets face it most of our Charter rights are derived from the U.N.'s Declaration of Human Rights which is only a guide and is not compulsary. Politicians have suckered Canadians in using rights from this human rights guide to achieve their own personal cultural goals and political agenda AKA social engineering. This certainly is not a very friendly thing to do to law abiding Canadians who have developed their own majority culture and traditions. In fact I would say this is a criminal action against law abiding Canadians. I am not complaining, I am stating a FACT. All I was suggesting is the Monarchy still has a role in Canadian politics. Why drag other threads into this one. You are confusing enough as it is. In fact relating to what I previously posted I am in favor of abolishing the Monarchy. Read it. And a lot less kooky than you favouring the current corrupt Charter of Rights and Freedoms dictated by politicians who rule like a king.

You mean 'was a bill of rights' relating to the previous federal 'Bill of Rights'. The constitution Act 1982 otherwise known as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a unilaterally federally-judicial altered document that does not serve or support the interest or will of the majority but caters to the ideologies under the guise of rights to ethnic groups, Quebec, special interest groups, Aboriginals that has created a dysfunctional society. The Constitution relating to rights is not a document meant for federal government politicians to unilaterally alter, discriminate or abuse against the rights of the will of the majority citizens of Canada under any circumstances. This of course includes the fanatical politician created official multicultural policy and official languages policy. It is obvious the earned rights and will of majority of Canadians means nothing and the power of the king prevails.

Another Trudeau fanatic living in fantasy land by way of a Charter that should be scrapped.

If you know anything about the Magna Carta issued by King John on the field of Runnymede in 1215 AD, then YOU KNOW it was the begining of the limitation of the power of the King TO RULE as he saw fit and the foundation of our laws and rights. You also must surely know that the extensive rights outlined in the Magna caused generation after generation of all classes of people to fight to secure their rights by reference to the Magna Carta. It took many revolts, wars ( civil, religious and otherwise) to accomplish our rights history. It seems you prefer returning to the pre-Maga Carta days and are sleeping in the same 'power like a King Trudeau bed' as CANADIEN. You two clueless idiots deserve each other.

English translation: human rights legislation falling into the hands and used by traitor DICTATORS like Quebec's Trudeau. I didn't repeat any crap as it was posted to let anyone who reads it be the judge. The root of the problem is 'human nature' and the quest for dominance utilizing aggression. This is of course unlike the artificial dominance demonstrated by Quebec's Trudeau and his Charter based on cultural imperialism.

Now, now. Cultural injection means: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_imperialism I have always supported federal and provincial Bill of Rights. But I don't support them being enshrined in the Constitution and dictated by corrupt, envious, jealous politicians and interpreted by judges who both mimic the actions of tin pot dictators. Ha-ha-ha. Not nearly as clueless as you are.

Canada.

Very briefly and relating to cultural imperialism. Cultural injection # 1: Closed every door possible to conventional immigration from British Isles and Western Europe and based new immigration policy on human rights agenda. This resulted in large numbers of ethnic immigrants who further created more minority groups in Canada all being thankful and under the control of the Liberal government resulting in votes for the Liberals. The switch to ethnic immigration was never asked for by Canadian citizens nor was immigration based on human rights legislation. Cultural injection # 2: The Official Language Policy of 1969: Especially created to make Canada's English/French population bilingual which failed miserably besides costing an estimated $17-billion every year to maintain with an estimated cost of around a trillion dollars since it's introduction. This language policy resulted in a high level of animosity between English/French since it was seen by many as nothing more than a affirmative action plan to create French employment thus forcing English speaking Canadians to be excluded from jobs. Cultural injection # 3: The Multicultural Policy of Canada 1971: Changed the traditional way immigrants were absorbed into the system by allowing them to learn the language and allowing immigrants to adapt to the ways of Canadians. Since the introduction of this policy it allowed immigrant cultures to be seen as equal to the Canadian culture and if pursued immigrant cultural demands could be or would be accommodated by government via financial grants or cultural promotion. Many Canadians see this as a form of apartheid or a Canadian style dictatorship. Cultural injection # 4: The Charter of rights and Freedoms: Fought for freedoms altered to government dictated freedoms and rights controlled by judges and government dictating the conditions of our freedoms. Canadians previously had no problem with federal and provincial Bill of Rights but NOT enshrined in the Constitution of Canada.

Yes, but is only made worse by posters like you who cannot face the reality that dominance over other cultures is a recognized fact of life. Get over it and accept it.

Genocide is eliminating a cultural period via extreme aggression. Aggressive Trudeau was also guilty of cultural imperialism by artificially injecting the culture of a minority language into the majority English language. This is something the dominant English speaking Canadians have never done to the minority French language Canadians by way of language policies and Charter amendments forcing them to speak the English language. I get IT every night. Relating to Aboriginals, is a matter of opinion. This has been discussed in many other threads. That was an invitation to you and we are still waiting for your input. I have and did via cultural dominance/cultural imperialism. It is human nature to want to be dominant. Ask the U.S. and they will tell you all about it. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha.

Cultural dominance is nothing new. Cultural imperialism happens right here in Canada under the guise of equality but can be easily argued it is the minority French language in pursuit of cultural dominance over the English language by way of the Constitution. The forced used of French under federal jurisdiction especially in the federal public service is an example of this despite the English language being the dominate language of Canada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_imperialism Also from the same source: "Residential schools in Canada designed to assimilate First Nations, Metis and Inuit children into the predominate European cultures of Canada (anglophone and francophone)."

"The Canadian Parliament is composed of three parts: the House of Commons, the Senate, and the Monarchy. In theory, for a law to come into effect, it must be approved by all three parts of Parliament." http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/monarchy-canada Notice bambino hardly ever supplies links or proof to support his statements.

UPDATE: http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2009/...8533461-cp.html

That is the purpose of this thread which is to discuss facts relating to the origins and reasons why for the extreme hatred directed towards the Jews. Be kind enough and feel free to post and share your alleged documented facts.

Through the Queens represntative the GG. Then why are we a Constitutional Monarchy and still tied historically to Britain with a British Westminster style Parliamentary Democracy that badly requires democratic reforms. Obviously our PM,s enjoy ruling like a KING but right, we are independent.

Overuse of the word 'WHEREAS' and Quebec really is not a state. The entire Act is rather embarrassing as Canada already has a Constitution and Quebec should not mimic Canada's Constitution as if it is a separate country. No, it is the fact Quebec thinks the ROC are NOT real Canadians. This Act along with the French Language Charter proves it.

No matter how you look at it the Canadian Parliament is composed of three parts: the House of Commons, the Senate, and the Monarchy. In theory, for a law to come into effect, it must be approved by all three parts of Parliament. The Queen is 'Head of State' and is the Queen of Canada with her image appearing on Canadian currency. Look, I am sick and tired of watching PM's rule in an autocratic manner and or catering to anti-Canadian ideologies using the powers of a Constitutional Monarchy and Parliamentary Democracy to achieve this. As a matter of fact because of this I am in favour of reforming Canada's Constitution. Canada should convene a Constitutional Assembly and draft a new Constitution making it totally independent of Britain and create especially checks and balances restraining the powers of the legislative, executive and judicial branches of our government along with other reforms.