Leafless

The Charter is a failure relating to official multiculturalism and official bilingualism in Canada and discriminates against English speaking Canadians. The Charter has resulted in Quebec being an isolationist province with immigrants living in ethnic enclaves. Excessive unwanted and uneeded human rights and a socialistic Charter an has turned Quebec into this: Notice the preamble. http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.c..._2/E20_2_A.html

I meant to say the Monarchy even though the "The Queen is the third component of Parliament" and:"The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the supreme legislative body in the United Kingdom and British overseas territories. It alone has parliamentary sovereignty, conferring it ultimate power over all other political bodies in the UK and its territories. At its head is the Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of..._United_Kingdom

There are five amending formulas. There are five amending formulas. Relating to first amending formula includes the Monarchy. Relating to the second amending formula: The fourth amending formula also mentions the Monarchy. And that delay was due to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Act_1982

All of these amendments you listed are under the authority of the federal government and do not even require the use of the amending formula. Any amendments that do require all provinces unanimously agreeing or approval of the British Parliament have to do with amendments relating to with those of the 'Office of the Queen'. Even the Constitution Act 1982 had to be approved by British Parliament since all Canadian provinces did not agree to ratify it. Quebec was the only province who refused to ratify it.

Cultural politics is ten times worse than office politics. Combine the two and you have major problems, like we have in Canada.

Genocide is a horrible thing including these. http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html So again we are not talking about any sort of genocide but the causes of the extreme hatred against the Jews by Nazi Germany.

Actually this thread has nothing to do with any holocaust but more do do with what created the extreme German animosity or hatred against the Jews. "The Jewish Declaration of war on Nazi Germany" http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptori...es/jdecwar.html

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/591647 Does David Ahenakew have a point: Food for thought: "The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany"

Canada unilaterally cannot make amendments to Canada's own inherited British constitution without obtaining permission from the British Parliament. Doesn't sound very sovereign to me.

What is clear enough is that you do not understand Canada is NOT a sovereign country.

Did you not read your own link:

How can you post such crapolla. You are wrong. http://www.bouckslawblog.com/bouckslawblog...ming-canad.html

Isn't what this thread is about, Canadians being denied one of their basic Charter rights 'Freedom of Expression' by way of threats of violence originating from Quebec. This is from an arrogant, self-righteous province that never signed the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 but is a province that has benefitted the most from it. From the days of the FLQ to to-day violence and anti-Canadian sentiments appears to pay off big time in Canada.

This is an American problem and is part of the reason why I think Obama will only be a one term president.

As unelected leader of the Liberal party Ignatieff should really give second thoughts about who exactly is on probation. So as an American citizen and one who has been out of the country for twenty-five years how as he served Canadian interest or what as he accomplished as a Canadian citizen to earn the position of leader of the Liberal party?

What did Ignatieff ever accomplish or do for Canada?

Maybe English speaking Canadians are but I know French Canadians are not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_de_lib%..._du_Qu%C3%A9bec

Yes, the feds do keep forgetting Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy with a Westminster style Parliamentary Democracy. It will take the Brits to teach them what 'good government' is all about and is not to be abused with republic political aspirations without any sort of safety valve serving the citizens of Canada.

You are praising Guy Carleton for aiding Quebecers to remain true to their heritage. That is news to me. http://ca.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_461...%A9bec_act.html They did not know what else to do with them and used them to Britains advantage. That is why they were given the Quebec Act. Thanks to the forced participation of Canadian tax payers and federal transfer payments along with a multitude of federal subsidies. Thanks to the efforts of communist inspired Quebecer Pierre Trudeau for forcing Quebec ideologies onto the ROC along with his his anti-Canadian actions while acting under the capacity of prime minister of Canada.

Quebecers were abandoned by France. We are talking after the Treaty of Paris. http://www.soyouwanna.com/site/pros_cons/quebec/quebec.html

The battle of St. Foy was a meaningless battle and made no difference relating to the British who were the victors of the war with France.

There is nothing to learn from you by way of your improperly structured sentences and usually full of spelling errors. Reading your post everyone knows you are francophone without you speaking a single word.

And what I wrote is a lot more of an insult and humiliation towards Quebecers than ANY type of reference by way of commemoration or otherwise to the battle of the Plains if Abraham. I still can't figure out why any Quebecer would still want to speak French after being humiliated and abandoned by their own country like that.

http://www.clpgh.org/research/pittsburgh/h...hindianwar.html You stated the Plains of Abraham was used to insult Quebec. And I replied: France insulted their own. My encyclopedia is not available on line but this quote from another source is close enough: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Battle-of-St.-Foy And from the same source:

Same thing as Wilber said in post #91 except said in a different way. Learn to comprehend. "The French lost North America not because they were lesser people but because French colonists were badly outnumbered by British colonists " And I said: "They also lost because they never did believe in proper immigration"