User

You should change your name to Revisionist. It took several years before he released his long-form birth certificate. Either way, what politicians think about this or its stupidity has nothing to do with any legal process that checks people's citizenship. Nice attempt at a dodge though.

It was a bench trial. No jury. This is a meaningless difference in the absurdity of the consequences here for what was done, regardless of a plea bargain or not.

No, she didn't. It was only later the White House did damage control and more information was provided. She was playing games with them this past week on what constitutes a "medical exam" being deceitful in answering that question and then playing like she didn't mean to only after the fact it was discovered Biden did in fact see his doctor... but she did not consider that to be an "medical exam" It is just weasel words. And the press corps was obviously frustrated with her. This is not my being wrong at all.

You are talking to one of the most unprincipled peanut chuckers on this forum. If you can't see that, then your notion of what constitutes an unprincipled peanut chucker is just about worthless.

What, what exactly is it you think the "Project 2025 people" are saying?

They don't care. Also, this isn't even the real problem. The real problem is that all these illegal immigrants are counted on the census and they give more power to the Congressional representation count. So... when California welcomes in a million illegal immigrants, they get more seats in Congress.

Quantify... "lots" of videos. I travel a lot, I have yet to see anyone show up at the airport without Real ID. It is pretty explicit that you need this to travel. Also... are you not familiar with Real ID? I am not talking about a digital ID or any national ID card. They are essentially your standard state issues ID card, but they took extra validation steps, such as a birth certificate.

It is just a remarkable big lie and coverup that this administration is engaged in right now. KJP was lying to the media and then refusing to answer questions about why there is a Parkinson's doctor coming to the White House so much.

The US has been moving to a Real ID for some time now and last I checked, it was required to fly (unless you are an illegal immigrant err... I meant, person claiming asylum who will soon be an illegal immigrant and the US is shuttling you around the country) Just amazing that for almost every common thing you do in life you need an ID, but when it comes to voting, it is always OMG, how will people ever be able to do that?!

What was the lie? He posted a link to something and a bit of his commentary on it. And if you are ever this concerned about trolling, look at your own behavior on here.

I understand these concepts. These were not what we were talking about. You said: "AVERAGE temperatures over 30 years DO NOT ROUTINELY vary without SIGNIFICANT CAUSES." I asked: "Define average temperatures here or what you call vary." Now, are you going to actually try to engage honestly here or just run away like you almost always do?

Watch out, he will threaten to block you! LOL

No, he was not "CONVICTED" of rape.

If she refuses lawful orders to leave, yes. If she continues to violate the law, yes. My home is not a homeless encampment nor is it a parking lot zoned for vehicle camping.

Yeah, amazing how they all waited until well into Trump's Presidency to come forward right when she was selling her book. Oh yeah... she couldn't remember what year it happened.

Yes... what? You didn't bother to explain anything you asserted at all.

Where was he "convicted" of rape? He was found civilly liable for rape. They are two different things.

Define average temperatures here or what you call vary. This is just nonsense. You can easily look at the last 100 years and see average temperatures varying over 30 years before this last 30 years.

The Judge talking has nothing to do with your assertion being false. Hint: Civil trial vs Criminal.

What is the difference? What makes someone African American and what makes someone Black? YOU made this distinction, now you can't figure out how to explain it.

Uh huh what? You were the one who made the stupid distinction that there was something different between African American and Black, but can't explain what that is and then said "Black" history month was mainly for "African Americans." The stupidity here is still all yours and you still can't explain what makes someone an African American vs Black in that you made this distinction.

No, he wasn't.

They were not all Trump's cases nor were they all "lost". Most were never even heard because of standing issues and the vast majority of them were either not heard from standing issues or outright dismissed.

When have temperatures ever not been increasing or decreasing in all of the world's history?