User

I don't think I was here when the whole remove Trump from the ballot movement was in full swing. Were you cheering that on? Tell us more about which party is a threat to democracy, when it was the Democrats literally trying an end-around on removing Trump from the ballot.

Gore lost his court cases too... yet you STILL claim it was not legitimate and lie about what happened.

It is comical that when I travel to Canada for work, I get interrogated and have to bring a statement declaring that I am not there to work or perform any jobs Canadians can do and that I promise to leave when I am done with said business trip promptly... But if I sneak across the border from Africa, I guess I get to stay and live?

Let's see it. Please give us 2 friends of his you have heard this from.

Her idea of leading has been to focus on DEI goals, not protecting those in her charge. She has also come out and fed us such obvious BS as the slope of the roof being why no one was on top of where the shooter was. She is not some hapless victim of her agents' gross incompetence. She sets the tone and is out there making excuses for them right now.

Good. You have sat here defending Biden doing this.

ROFL. Wow... you almost get it. Just like the Biden Admin has weaponized the DOJ to go after folks on the right. The Process is the punishment. You cheer this on when it comes to January 6th and Pro-Life folks...

He took credit for it... and then they let the story die when it came out he blew up a bunch of kids.

They have nothing to worry about if they are innocent...

The woman in DC is out there BS'ing us with a sloped roof excuse after focusing her time on promoting DEI in the agency.

Tell me you have never worked in any kind of business that employs more than 1 person without telling me...

That is not really the question though. It is not if a current homeless person can afford housing... you can play those same numbers out just about anywhere in any town in America. If you start at zero, with nothing, no income... you can't afford anything. Is that why a homeless person in Seatle is homeless? Well, just can't afford a home, so going to live on the streets I guess. No, if they do not have some underlying condition, there are a million things you can do to move to get housing to get a job starting from nothing somewhere else.

Dear diary...

No, it is not. You cited someone else's view on studies, but those studies were a statistical comparison of housing prices going up in large cities compared to homeless rates. If there is a particular study you want to use, cite it, then I can see how they are coming to that conclusion because otherwise, it is a bit specious to try to conclude that San Francisco has more homelessness because their housing prices are going up... when Homeless people flock to larger left wing cities on the coast for other reasons. There is also the difference between chronic homelessness and how people are counted as "homeless" when they are not out living on the streets like the homelessness we are talking about. You can do the same kind of comparison between Deinstitutionalization in America and the rise of homelessness. Not interested in your extreme partisan generalizations. If there is a legal place to go, you have defacto created a magnet for homeless people to abuse. And there are private shelters in the area... but they didn't count some of them because they were religious and have rules around no drinking... They do have legal places to go, they can legally stay with people like you who think it is unethical to combat homeless people abusing public areas.

The majority of homeless people are not homeless because of a recent job loss or rent increase... For those with mental health issues, bring back involuntary commitment if they are unable to care for themselves... and for those who chose that lifestyle... then they can go choose it somewhere else.

The Biden administration and Democrats shoved through several spending measures to the tune of Trillions beyond the 2nd and 3rd round of COVID stimulus. LOL, like you have been doing in most of the other threads you try in... you run away.

I already responded to this too! Then you ignored me and said you just wanted to talk about Vance. "LOL... you must have missed the Harris-Biden debates and completely ignored what Vance has since said about being wrong about Trump. Funny that you bring up Mitt Romney when Democrats completely trashed the man and Biden accused him of going to put black people back into chains for crying out loud. It doesn't matter who the Republicans nominate, you folks on the left will call them all evil and Hitler... Paul Ryan? Oh yeah, he was going to push old people off a cliff according to Democrats. "

LOL, this was in incoherent rambling mess from the start.

I know you are only concerned with Vance. That was my point when I said: "So, it's pretty much politics every election cycle. Heated primaries turn into support for the eventual nominee. The only issue here is that you only seem to care about this because it is Trump while ignoring that Democrats do this too. " Thank you for confirming the second part, again.

LOL... you must have missed the Harris-Biden debates and completely ignored what Vance has since said about being wrong about Trump. Funny that you bring up Mitt Romney when Democrats completely trashed the man and Biden accused him of going to put black people back into chains for crying out loud. It doesn't matter who the Republicans nominate, you folks on the left will call them all evil and Hitler... Paul Ryan? Oh yeah, he was going to push old people off a cliff according to Democrats.

Dear Diary...

Well... the other thought here is that you can be a registered Republican and hate Trump. There are plenty of Never Trump Republicans who despise him, many that did flip to being Democrats too. He might have been registered Republican for any number of reasons that make sense... This is why I asked who does he support and what does he support, and what we do know is that he gave money to the left.

Oh sure. I agree... and I am not opposed to *any* female SS agents either. Clearly you need them for certain situations and to help protect females and more easily go into female spaces... BUT... you have a much narrower field to fill there and can choose the best of the best, still knowing they have their limits and back them up. However, just putting women in the SS because DEI, want to fill a quota of having more women... is sheer madness.

So, it's pretty much politics every election cycle. Heated primaries turn into support for the eventual nominee. The only issue here is that you only seem to care about this because it is Trump while ignoring that Democrats do this too.

Of course, they couldn't possibly be abusing resources at all because they are not abusing them 100% of the time. Nope, it must be 100% or nothing. You got us! What a brilliant and perfectly logical point you have made here.