User

You should take your own advice. Oh, I am sure you will playing this same dumb schtick again in another thread. No need to dishonestly act like you are somehow walking away the better man here. LOL

We are not talking about folks dressed up like a dog for Halloween... we are talking about clearly sexualized fetish level leather and chains... But yeah, sure, lets pretend like it is all just in good fun... what you are doing here isn't honest. Nothing sexualized about these outfits... at all.

And yet, that identity grouping is much more, it is a hierarchy of victimhood that the left pushes special treatments to give out to them, special rules, laws, and privileges for them that puts them above others. The only issue here is one of sematics. Fine, you don't like the term fascism, then we will use the term authoritarianism. When the lefts brand of authoritarianism isn't much different than fascism...

What makes you ask me if it is OK to sell my daughter into slavery? What makes you ask me if it is OK to cheat on all three wives with the next one? What makes you ask me if it is OK to beat a slave as long I they are not killed? You don't seem to be very familiar with how things ended for Lot's lineage... not does The Biblical story offer any moral condoning of what Lot's daughters did. It was merely an account of what was done, which did not turn out too well for them nor do Jews or Christians look on that story as anything other than an example of immorality and the problems of being drunk as well. I am a bit confused now, as you just got done showing your ignorance and bigotry towards Christianity and now... you say go out and do Good Christian stuff? Being a Christian is based on what we know of Jesus as told in The Bible.

Here on out? Democrats STILL cry about Bush v Gore, Democrats spent the entirety of Trumps first term claiming he stole the election with Russia, as did Clinton too. This notion that somehow things are only different now with Trump is just false on its face.

For crying out loud, he said that AFTER you said this: "I am not going to sift through thousands upon thousands of articles from the sources that you listed. "

His deficits come from his spending on the the big infrastructure package they brag about as well as the so-called American Rescue plan, the CHIPS act, the "inflation reduction" act... The Democrats went on a spending frenzy while they could. They own these deficits and this is exactly why we also say they own the continued inflation that went on for years as they dumped money onto the economy like mad men. That is not cherry picking, those are cold hard facts. Biden and the Democrats own these massive deficits.

LOL, because it is going to go real well for him as a Candidate for President after having just been removed by the 25th Amendment from being the current President?

You should consider getting a journal or something. I am not sure you grasp how these public forums work.

He ran smaller deficits as compared to Biden, he ran bigger deficits as compared to Obama... Trump didn't do much of anything to control spending. Neither did Republicans. They all teamed up with Democrats to increase spending. More $$$ for Defense and more $$$ for social programs. This is where Conservatives like me have such a problem with what we call the establishment party, which is both Republicans and Democrats entrenched in the Washington DC way of spending money with no care in the world. Its why we end up 500K dollars going to study shrimp on treadmills...

Huh? This sentence makes no sense. Voters could always elect governments that passed laws restricting and punishing people from "camping" like this. How you think this has anything to do with being able to mandate poor people do not exist is beyond me. If this was a plausible next step... nothing was preventing this before now.

Cities were already able to criminalize homelessness; the SCOTUS struck down an absurd local court ruling that these particular ordinances violated the 8th Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment. This does nothing more than was already happening before.

Which is still more than you presented.

You clearly didn't bother with even trying to research what the impeachment was about. What a shame, it is so easy to google this stuff. The world is at your fingertips. I see you are still well entrenched in your ignorance on this subject.

I don't think you are willing to really look at what the answer to that might be.

What is this, backwards bonzo world to you now?

It is pretty transparent when your first thought is to turn this into a cheap shot at the poster who brought it up instead of condemning what happened.

He was about to be impeached and would have been convicted in the Senate. He was pressured to resign so it wouldn't come to that. Your first post here and continued insistence of not backing off it prove otherwise.

The person doing the hand waving here was you... again, nothing honest about this: "With no law capable of constraining the executive, the last barrier to dictatorship has fallen, along with all of John Roberts hopes for legacy. Instead, should the country survive to remember, this court will live in infamy."

It was obvious he was mocking that as your usual schtick on this forum, not that you did it specifically in this thread yet. The gist being that is likely what you would end up doing here though...

No one tried to use lawfare like this to get Obama after he left office...

Personally oversaw? OK.. Trump will not personally oversee the people he is ordering to be executed either. Don't worry, he will come up with a reason to kill them too, remember, he will declare them to be enemies of the state. They will be legitimate targets. Also... Obama killed more than that one American citizen...

I quite specifically said drone strikes of American citizens. It must be that you did not read what I wrote. Well... when Trump uses his newfound immunity to order the military to assassinate anyone he wants to it will not be him pushing the button either!

The voting population is only about 250 Million. Only about 165 Million Voted. Even less in the party primaries to nominate these two... But, your point still stands.

Bush and Trump were killing Americans? I don't think so... This is the garbage you are pushing here. If anyone has come close to the whole OMG TRUMP WILL ORDER AMERICANS TO BE ASSASSINATED is Obama.