User

So... pretty much how you and other leftists act on this forum.

Um, it is pretty clearly implied. Throughout all of human history, this is what a military does. What next, do you need a disclaimer saying that water is wet?

There is no terrorist loophole where an organization gets to harm your country and you just have to say... well, oops, oh well, I guess they are not a country so we can't be engaged in combat against them! You are making the obtuse point like these are just some random civilians out on their sail boat enjoying a picnic. The United States of America, following American law, has declared these narco terrorist factions as an enemy of the state. Wo... wait a minute, how exactly were these "terrorists" at "war" with the United States? They were no more committing "attacks" against US soil than these narco terrorists are right now. Because it is an irrelevant distraction in this thread. You run away from almost every discussion you are ever in, why am I wasting my time responding to your distractions here? Yeah, says the most extreme partisan on this forum where you start with that premise and work backwards from there in almost every discussion you are in!

Not for your assertion, no. Sure, but that was not your big assertion about the data. Ah, there it is. There is your problem right there! If? We just spent several pages with me telling you that you were wrong and why. Prove it. Also, show the proportions because percentages matter. If 80 out 100 people get vaccinated, and 2 people out of the 80 die and 1 out of the 10 die, that means that 10% of the unvaccinated died from COVID while 2.5% of the vaccinated died. That means the vaccine helped cause less death. The underlying problem of your whole claim here is that you are looking at total numbers, which doesn't prove anything other than your inability to understand statistics. You made an assertion. LOL I don't have to think anything other than you are full of shit and can't back up your claim. Yet again, you only show your ignorance of statistics. What was the total number of hospitalizations compared to the total population of unvaccinated? Because... if there were 1,000,000 unvaccinated and 20,000 hospitalizations, that is entirely plausible that many/most of them were the unvaccinated. But again, this is the problem with your assertion: you don't have those numbers, and without them, you are full of shit. And again, proportions matter. LOL, you are not beating anyone here.

No, that doesn't prove they did exactly what he wanted at all. That is just your OPINION as you love to say. Another lazy spam bot link to Facebook!

Well, when it comes to Sharia law, being Muslim has 100% of everything to do with that...

That is the entire point of what the military does… duh.

It’s literally on the same video you are here referencing. These are facts: Fact: Reports quoting soldiers there said they fired upon them because they moved away from soldiers back into building Fact: Video shows them moving away from soldiers back into building when they were shot

How so?

What a load of shit. These were terrorists that had refused to come out for hours and then, on video and according to soldiers, they started to crawl back inside. Then they were shot. When terrorists balk at your commands and are moving away from you… they are not surrendering anymore.

Making progress! At least this time the lazy spam bot posted a quote.

Good thing this isn’t what happened at all. This has been explained before, that the administration publicly posted its rationale and declaration of these narco terrorists as terrorists. They are a combatant the same way a fuel truck delivering fuel to tanks on the battlefield is a combatant. You people will take being obtuse to any level to further your hate of Trump. These concepts are not new, Trump didn’t invent them, Presidents have been blowing people up like this for a long time. Obama was famous for blowing up people all over the world with drones. But that was Obama, so leftists like you don’t care.

Insulting me doesn't change the facts, your ignorant comments, your inability to argue your positions, or your absurd fear-mongering. I am well aware of the scheme for alternate electors.

No, he did not try to steal an election illegally. Trump denounced the violence when it was happening, he told them to go march in peace before it ever happened. Next time... what? Nothing came close to happening the first time. Hell, even if the mob had somehow successfully captured the building... so what? The country is not ruled like a game of capture the flag, like, if only if they got into the chamber and stood there for 4 hours, BOOM, they now control the United States of America and everyone has to go along! People like you do not live in reality here, this is all just fantasy land garbage fear-mongering.

Well, I mean, other than the complete lack of evidence, sure. Well, this is your strawman argument and you still can't prove it either way. Well, first, I don't need to point to anything other than the complete lack of evidence you have for your assertions.

Did you even bother to read your source? These are military targets as they are declared enemy combatants. They are not just some random civilian vessel.

What orders?

Trump was not the President in April 2014.

Dispute what? You are too lazy to post anything. You are a spam bot.

Deal with what Epstein mess? This is YOUR silly distraction. The law was passed, Trump signed it. Its a big nothing burger and you know it, so you are still trying to find ways to politicize it.

LOL, WWI? At this rate, WWI was won long before Russia will ever win here. If you can't explain what your point is, then you have no point to consider.

So... you can't show me those things. Once again, you can't support your claims. What was 90%? No, I am calling your assertion BS. Which it is. Yes, your analogy was dumb. No, you never showed me that, and why are you only focused on 6 weeks? Again, why do you believe these stats but call them liars and ignore the stats you don't like?

No, I am just pointing out the problems with your assertions. It is not about what I want... it is YOUR claim. To the point, you can't support it.

You guys can't even make a coherent argument on the Canadian data... Give me your best study, also, this has nothing to do with the numbers that matter. I pointed out that what matters here was the vaccinated vs unvaccinated who were hospitalized, then also the proportions of those in ICU and death. So... your response is, to bring up who gets COVID more? I don't think this at all, this is another one of your baseless assertions. No... but if they are some fringe "study" that is not really much of a study at all, I will of course point that out. More BS. More BS. Nope, wrong again, follow this discussion. I was responding to WestCanMan

OK, so by "losing" they are slowly being ground down by Russia over the next 100 years... OK.