User

Defend what? You are pushing the same lies and anti-vax crap you have always been pushing.

Um, no. There was nothing provided here for us to make any such inference at all. I can't find anything to back up any of the claims here either. There is no public record or information to back up the claim the FDA tried to pay him off, no copy of the death certificate, no copy of the autopsy... There is no reason to believe any of this nonsense. You continue to purposefully be dishonest about what VAERS is and does, you do so by playing this vague innuendo game instead of an actual logical argument.

You were making some solid points, but had to go way off to your typical far-left-wing talking points here about Fox News. But hey, if you stop being a coward for a moment, maybe you can prove your consistency here and tell us if this is your opinion about most if not all cable media outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and others too, or is it just FOX?

Says the person who routinely posts polls to make your point...

I know. They come, take a dump on the floor, and then leave, or stay around long enough to smear it around a bit—just lazy trolling spam. Give us something to address. What is your commentary we should respond to?

Educate yourself: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/designating-cartels-and-other-organizations-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations-and-specially-designated-global-terrorists/ You always love to ignore what you said that I was responding to... which was your stupid DURRRRRRR Its not "combat" DURRRRRRRRRR Trump didn't just say they were, it is not murder, it is not being done just as he pleases... It helps if you try to be honest. Educated yourself. So, you are sticking with the conspiracy theory of yours, that the entire chain of command is a bunch of mindless robots blowing up families on sailboats enjoying a picnic because Trump randomly woke up one day and said they were terrorists... You are not a serious person. What about them? As I said, you are pushing this absurd conspiracy theory. Now you don't even believe narco terrorists exist! Trump has broken you people. Your brains do not work, you will do or say anything to spite Trump. Again, you were the one who made the ignorant arguments about locations. Like I continually have to do, I corrected you. Glad you have come around. Except, you made the argument about the location... You were the one trying to argue Obama was not responsible.

Are we still doing this stupid, dishonest game where you pretend like Hegseth was not in the military on the front lines serving as an Officer in wartime? DURRRRRRRRRRRRRR i Am A lIbTaRd, HeGsEtH wAs JuSt A fOx NeWs HoSt DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

OK... and? You either do not understand VAERS reporting or are purposely being dishonest about it here.

No crap, there was a big spike at that time... now tell us how many of those deaths were unvaccinated vs vaccinated and the proportions. This is a lie. You have zero evidence for this. No crap, there was a big spike at that time... now tell us how many of those were unvaccinated vs vaccinated and the proportions. As well as severe cases in the ICU. Yes, so did cars. A lot more from cars. Vastly more from cars. People drowned in swimming pools too. What is your point? How many? What is your source? How many? How badly? What is your source?

No one said VAERS was worthless. You are arguing against a strawman. VAERS is a bellwether for tracking unknown or unexpected issues or concerns with Vaccine safety. It helps if you and other anti-vaxxers would engage honestly about these things instead of trying to mischaracterize deliberately.

Well, I mean, clearly you don't. The point is that this FDA release is hardly grounded in any real methodology. To my point: Note: The FDA did not release any documentation; this was a memo with no specifics given, alleging deaths based on previous VAERS data. Feel free to respond to my commentary above instead of the one sentence I quoted from the article. Yes, you have singled out one sentence and are ignoring the rest...

And... you still ignore the point.

Oh wow, lazy spam bot found another person to link to because he is too lazy or incapable of making his own arguments…

The motives? The point here is YOUR motives. You want to surrender Canada to anyone that wants to take it, abandon the military, but then you cheer on the Gaza terrorists and their fighting. What is wrong with you?

It was pretty obvious I was responding to your point on pulling aid/support, which was immediately resumed. I wasn’t claiming Trump said those things as response to Zelensky’s entitlement attitude. Ive already conceded what Trump said was dumb, and he has since walked back most if not all of that and isn’t still saying it. You want to ignore years of support, years of Trump standing up to Putin, and pretend a couple of stupid comments that are long gone are the only thing to judge Trump by. This isn’t an issue of my devotion, it’s your inability to argue earnestly because you must hate Trump. Once again, you made a claim of material fact about how I posted here… you didn’t just subjectively call me a sycophant. You keep ignoring that point because you are a liar and will do just about anything other than own up to what you said being wrong.

So… you literally didn’t respond to anything I said, and instead fabricated stuff I didn’t. Come back when/if you actually want to respond to something I said.

What were the polls saying for Harris to win that you were touting? ROFL

My memory is not selective at all. What does the revolution in 2014 have to do with Russia invading? The fighting started in East Ukraine when Russia started their shadow war there, funding and pushing separatists elements, and then outright supplementing them with Russian forces. You are posting an obvious lie. If Russia were advancing at will right now, they would be in Kiev and have full control over Ukraine…. Not debatable. You can certainly deny the obvious like you do, but you don’t offer any actual debate. You just push obvious lies, baseless assertions, that are easily proven wrong with the actual facts. Why are you not on the front lines fighting with Russia?

And I have repeatedly responded to you in that thread as well… This is your claim, you want to drag it up here, then you support it here.

Amazing. You spend the last 2 years cheering on and defend the terrorist thugs in Gaza, want them to keep fighting on and killing Israelis… And now you want Canada to just surrender to anyone who wants to invade.

Yet you expect Ukraine to just surrender and give up? As if they are the ones guilty for prolonging this war unnecessarily? The onus here is on Russia, they are the aggressors.

It’s not about Ukraine choosing to fight on as if they are the ones continuing the war. Russia is invading them. Ukraine is fighting back to defend themselves. The war could be over today if Russia simply stops invading.

Nothing to do with being lazy, it’s your claim. Not my job to go figure out where you supported it, if you ever actually did. Based on your comments, I’m guessing it was some crap “study” or didn’t say what you say it does… I was making it easy for you, just asking for the best example you have, presuming it is garbage or you can’t produce it. If you want to give me more, let’s see them.

You cherry picked a comment that was part of a statistical hypothetical explaining the concept for how just saying more in the context West was using was not accurate, we need to use proportions. in my example, yes, it does in fact mean that vaccines showed better results for helping people in that comparison.