User

Well, it’s just an incredibly awful response on so many levels. Like, what is he saying here, that if crime is down overall, we shouldn’t care if crazy criminals are still left roaming the streets killing and brutally raping/attacking women on the subway? like, sorry, sorry we let this guy go and don’t care that he was arrested 70 times and beats up women and gets right back out, but here look at the stats, you can see crime is down 1% this year!

More spam from the spam bot. At this point, you might as well be kicked off this forum too. This is literally you just creating worthless thread to spam the forum now:

Read my post again. You don’t want to talk about either this crime or the statistics. You throw statistics out so you can dismiss this, ignore it, and obfuscate. You don’t need statistics to simply look at this issue, analyze it, and understand it what went wrong. I have played this dumb game with you before, I have explained it to you before, and you don’t engage. Your position isn’t logical, it’s a dishonest tactic to avoid having to discuss the issue. If one person dies on a construction site, gets run over by a dump truck backing up, because the back up alarm wasn’t working, we don’t need to sit around saying we can’t care about this, because statistics! Sorry, until about 1,000 more people die from failed backup alarms, can’t talk about this!

Original thought? You are spamming the forum with links to videos. What original thoughts are you sharing? You cowardly hide from “original thought” when it calls out the stupid crap you post.

No, but you are unable to provide any fact based argument to support this. You just proclaim it to be true and then act like everyone must agree.

Of course NATO military can be leverage. NATO is a defensive alliance though, Ukraine isn’t a member, and NATO countries certainly are not willing to do this. So, what is your proposal here? That NATO should threaten war against Russia? What convictions of mine have evaporated? Im quite consistent. Yours and others TDS in trying to use anything and frame anything you can negatively to get Trump, and my calling you out for it, doesn’t make Trump my messiah.

LOL The problem is that you don’t care about either this incident or the big picture. You want to ignore this incident and change the subject, because this incident is an example of the larger issues you have no interest in changing.

It’s not an “American proposal” This has already been pointed out to you that this was an initial framework that takes into account both sides starting positions. You avoid the actual point here is that you want to put demands for Russia, but you are incapable of explaining what leverage there is to make such demands.

What leverage is had against Russia to demand such a thing?

More spam from the spam bot.

Actual debate… LOL, says the spam bot.

More lazy spam from the spam bot @robosmith

LOL, you don’t care about the law here.

Holy shit you are one of the most fundamentally dishonest people on this forum. We don’t need universal healthcare to lock criminals up or to lock up the criminally insane or to commit people involuntarily. This has absolutely nothing to do with universal healthcare. The fact that you are making my excuses for this man being in the street to beat women up and victimize women is the problem. People like you are why this man is a problem. You don’t care.

Spam, spam, spam

Oh man, more spam from the spam bot.

More spam... I swear, you are little more than a spam bot on here.

Because every President before Trump was not dealing with Putin/Russia and Xi/China? I swear, how are you as dumb and dishonest as you are?

Hey, brain-dead simpleton, you guys have spent the last year crying that we were not giving more away around the world... and now you are crying about a LOAN/CREDIT facilitation? We did not give Argentina 40 billion dollars.

You say that as if 34 meant something like 34 different offenses... when it was just the same "offense" of making a payment 34 different times that was not even a felony.

OK, coward, when are you going to respond to any of the responses to you here?

No one "CONVICTED" him by pointing out who this man is and his criminal past. But you are totally cool with all the other victims out there, like the one he beat to unconsciousness, damaging her optic nerves...

Drugs are not some average thing people just casually desire. They are highly addictive and life-destroying substances that people are hopelessly addicted to. At that point, it is not longer about supply and demand like this is just wanting a cheeseburger or something.

Why bring race into it?

Can we please start taking crime seriously in this country and keep these people locked up? Bethany MaGee, 26, identified as Chicago victim set on fire on CTA train by serial thug with 72 arrests https://nypost.com/2025/11/23/us-news/bethany-magee-26-identified-as-chicago-woman-set-on-fire-on-cta-train-by-serial-thug-with-72-arrests/ " “It is devastating that a career criminal with 72 PRIOR ARRESTS is now accused of attacking 26-year-old Bethany MaGee on Chicago’s L train, and setting her on fire,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said on social media Sunday. “This would never have happened if this thug had been behind bars. Yet Chicago lets repeat offenders roam the streets,” Duffy said of suspect Lawrence Reed, 50, who is facing federal terrorism charges in connection with the senseless fire attack." THIS IS MADNESS!!!! "Reed has 22 prior arrests since 2016 alone, and 53 criminal cases in Cook County dating back to 1993 — nine of them felonies for which he pleaded guilty, officials said. However, he’s only served time twice, spending just 2.5 years behind bars in total, according to CWB Chicago."