User

America is not far from shooting peaceful demonstrators? I swear, you people are so far gone with your hate for Trump.

Interesting and excellent post. I need to go research how doctors reconcile the "do no harm" and/or give no deadly drug parts of the oath, or if they just modified it to be compatible with helping someone kill themselves.

What is the similarity here that leads you to ask this question? "could still happen" You just got done mocking the concept, and then when I throw your own past words in your face you flip flop again to saying it could happen.

You were literally arguing just this in your initial invasion thread. Now you sit here saying the opposite? You literally said, in regards to the moving of a few ships to the coastal region: "unless you wanted to get troops to shore in mass." Further alluding to docks for a landing force: "Comprises of Aircraft carriers and engineering ships that act as floating docks." Your first comment in that thread, made it seem like we were sending massive troops: "But would require an Iraq style peace keeping mission to liberate their oil. " You further went on to talk about the population being armed to prevent an invasion (what would have to be some massive full scale actual invasion) "Maduro predecessor Hugo Chavez gave their population guns just so it would complicate US/European invasion ."

Perhaps, but not in the context you initially claimed or tried to assert was an "invasion." The oil industry can likely do what it needs to do with private contractors backed by American air power.

Except... you only do it and only after being whittled down to this after days and multiple threads of postings. Even just before this post you were still making vague assertions about the video you did post which you did not respond to my question about... So, now you want a prize and accolades for being so accommodating, as if you just cleaned up an error so easily and readily? No. What I admit is that he as a reporter makes people feel uncomfortable, but that doesn't somehow support your suspicions or claims about them. All of the videos and evidence and links you have shared so far, show him standing around or harmlessly walking around asking people questions or trying to. You don't have to like him, like his abrasiveness, or like that he comes across the way he does... so what? That doesn't justify saying he is not a journalist or even worse trying to claim he is purposefully assaulting police. I did. Show me where the charges stuck. In every example I have seen, he was the one being abused by police or the police were coming up with specious reasons to arrest him and charge him and those charges never go anywhere because of that. In fact, so far, all this shows is how awful the police and government forces are acting against him. As I already pointed out, that is not all you did, you continue to push other comments or only half way admit to any wrong. So, I keep talking about it and responding to those comments. Are you just trying to win when you keep playing the games you do? It certainly doesn't seem like you want much of a discussion either. I respond to what you post, this all started with your pretty bold assertions about Rebel news and what you said about people like me believing things from them. To that point, you still have not taken that garbage statement back either.

Can you actually explain how this follows?

Well, I have to admit, I never imagined Trump would actually do this. I give you partial credit, though, as this was not an "invasion" like you were characterizing, but is still more of an "invasion" than I said was not going to happen.

Maybe Obama should not have mocked Mitt Romney about his foreign policy after all...

Sematics. If we have the rights to the oil, saying it is our oil is the same as saying it is our oil. On that note, just to make sure your claims about this being illegal are not just partisan ramblings, you do also agree that Biden and Obama both engaged in the illegal use of the military too? This term has been around since the 80's you clown.

LAzy spambot strikes again!

Well, at least this time you actually added a comment. Not much of one, but baby steps. Still a lazy spambot in the end.

No, I said your logic says otherwise. If you want to run away like a coward, that is on you. Don't blame me for being dishonest when you are the one lying about what I said.

Except, your argument's logic says otherwise. It has already been pointed out to you that the limits have changed, that it is no longer chronically ill people suffering on their deathbed just wanting to be put out of their last dying days of misery, like you keep focusing on.

Yes, you are. You still are. You only quoted one part of my sentence as I already explained we were not talking about ICE "This particular obfuscation of yours is current centered around deportation of illegal immigrants, not a particular security group." And yet you still respond about ICE. No, you said you supported a nation's right to do so... and I have been pressing you for a specific response about what you believe. You finally answer. Finally. Why you had to make it this difficult to begin with is beyond me.

You can't prove it, because it doesn't exist. So far, you are the one showing how unserious you are here. This was your last comment: "1. I don't have it. It was either a different camera shot of the same incident, or a different incident. 2. From that other video. 3. I'm not saying I was wrong, I just say that I don't have video evidence. Whatever video I saw, I can't find now. I would say that there is evidence that this reporter, or so-called reporter, gets arrested regularly for these kind of agitations, such as disturbing, the peace or violating peace Bond. And then he reports on it. I can't think of another legitimate press vehicle that does that." Do you see any question marks in there? No. So what questions did I not respond to? I am asking you questions because you are entirely unserious here as you push your dishonest characterizations of Rebel News, when asked to prove it you run away, when I bring it back up again, you post a link to a video that doesn't back up your claim and then say you are not even sure that was the incident anyhow... More to what? Make up your mind. Is this the incident, or is it not? How does this video have anything to do with anything? And yet, you come here to a public forum to push an assertion you can't support? Only now, when pushed repeatedly only after initially making the claim and running away and then playing games about ignoring me again and trying to post a video that doesn't prove what you were asserting... yes, you have been playing games and still are. Remember, this was your comment in the other thread, where you came out guns blazing pushing your assertion: "Yes, selective editing provides exactly the kind of propaganda people like you need to believe in. Look up David Menzies, he's a publicity clown not a journalist. Of course, if anybody says anything bad about Trudeau they're automatically a beacon of Truth in your eyes." So, no, you can't provide one example. Show me where any of these charges have stuck.

Except, having the option to go to the grocery store or liquor store to buy a beer is not the same as a doctor having a professional obligation to inform you of the MAID program and refer you to someone for care if they themselves do not feel comfortable helping. So, the MAID program does not just merely exist, it is a medical treatment patients will be advised of. Must be given guidance and care for if interested in. I mean, it would be like seeing someone upset and then saying, here, why not have a drink to drown your sorrows away! Do you agree there should be any limits? Your arguments are very much generalized that if a person wants it then who are we to say no. So, perfectly healthy adult wants to die, you are cool with that?

How about no.

As much as you run away from appearing to be a pedophile.

Yes, that was the point the entire time about what Musk was doing to... He was very clearly putting his hand to his heart to extend his heartfelt thanks out to the crowd.

This particular obfuscation of yours is current centered around deportation of illegal immigrants, not a particular security group. You are still playing games. I already explained how you are playing games. Here you go again: You have taken a simple question, and turned it into several responses and still not actually answered the question. Yeah, one small baby step, but still not directly answering the actual question. Again: Do you support (or insert whatever word you want here that indicates you approve of, condone, agree with, etc) the deportation of illegal immigrants. Not that you think a country has a right to do this or any other sideways way of avoiding the question. YOU Michael Hardner, what do YOU support (or insert whatever word you want here that indicates you approve of, condone, agree with, etc)

You must be desperate for attention today.

Cheap sparklers and it looks like cheap flammable insulation on the ceiling that caught fire. It is amazing that this crap is still going on after the Great White Station Night Club fire, which started the same way.

You are worse than a 2nd grade school kid. Hell, they might have kept you locked down in that terror tunnel and that is why your intellect is at that level still.

And you cheer them on.