User

You can't prove it, because it doesn't exist. So far, you are the one showing how unserious you are here. This was your last comment: "1. I don't have it. It was either a different camera shot of the same incident, or a different incident. 2. From that other video. 3. I'm not saying I was wrong, I just say that I don't have video evidence. Whatever video I saw, I can't find now. I would say that there is evidence that this reporter, or so-called reporter, gets arrested regularly for these kind of agitations, such as disturbing, the peace or violating peace Bond. And then he reports on it. I can't think of another legitimate press vehicle that does that." Do you see any question marks in there? No. So what questions did I not respond to? I am asking you questions because you are entirely unserious here as you push your dishonest characterizations of Rebel News, when asked to prove it you run away, when I bring it back up again, you post a link to a video that doesn't back up your claim and then say you are not even sure that was the incident anyhow... More to what? Make up your mind. Is this the incident, or is it not? How does this video have anything to do with anything? And yet, you come here to a public forum to push an assertion you can't support? Only now, when pushed repeatedly only after initially making the claim and running away and then playing games about ignoring me again and trying to post a video that doesn't prove what you were asserting... yes, you have been playing games and still are. Remember, this was your comment in the other thread, where you came out guns blazing pushing your assertion: "Yes, selective editing provides exactly the kind of propaganda people like you need to believe in. Look up David Menzies, he's a publicity clown not a journalist. Of course, if anybody says anything bad about Trudeau they're automatically a beacon of Truth in your eyes." So, no, you can't provide one example. Show me where any of these charges have stuck.

Except, having the option to go to the grocery store or liquor store to buy a beer is not the same as a doctor having a professional obligation to inform you of the MAID program and refer you to someone for care if they themselves do not feel comfortable helping. So, the MAID program does not just merely exist, it is a medical treatment patients will be advised of. Must be given guidance and care for if interested in. I mean, it would be like seeing someone upset and then saying, here, why not have a drink to drown your sorrows away! Do you agree there should be any limits? Your arguments are very much generalized that if a person wants it then who are we to say no. So, perfectly healthy adult wants to die, you are cool with that?

How about no.

As much as you run away from appearing to be a pedophile.

Yes, that was the point the entire time about what Musk was doing to... He was very clearly putting his hand to his heart to extend his heartfelt thanks out to the crowd.

This particular obfuscation of yours is current centered around deportation of illegal immigrants, not a particular security group. You are still playing games. I already explained how you are playing games. Here you go again: You have taken a simple question, and turned it into several responses and still not actually answered the question. Yeah, one small baby step, but still not directly answering the actual question. Again: Do you support (or insert whatever word you want here that indicates you approve of, condone, agree with, etc) the deportation of illegal immigrants. Not that you think a country has a right to do this or any other sideways way of avoiding the question. YOU Michael Hardner, what do YOU support (or insert whatever word you want here that indicates you approve of, condone, agree with, etc)

You must be desperate for attention today.

Cheap sparklers and it looks like cheap flammable insulation on the ceiling that caught fire. It is amazing that this crap is still going on after the Great White Station Night Club fire, which started the same way.

You are worse than a 2nd grade school kid. Hell, they might have kept you locked down in that terror tunnel and that is why your intellect is at that level still.

And you cheer them on.

You got nothing as always.

He screamed into the void.

So… why did you share the video you did if you are now going to claim you don’t even know if it was even the incident you are talking about? This is YOUR argument and YOUR claim about Rebel News, and you can’t back it up with anything. Again, you tried to share a video to support your claims, but now that you have been called out you balk and say it is some other video. What other video? See, once again, you play games. Let’s face it, you were wrong. Why not just own up to that? Let’s play your game. Define regularly. Hell, can you even produce one example to support your assertions here? The guys “agitations” are little more than being annoying by asking questions. You know, things journalists do. You now say he was disturbing the peace. A new argument. Give an example, because these are the incidents I was talking about with folks like Avi where they go to a protest to report, but because the police and other countries do not support free speech like America does, they get arrested because how dare they ask protestors difficult questions because then the protestors get upset and try to attack them. Instead of arresting the protesters for engaging in violence, they preemptively arrest Rebel news reporters for stuff like breaching the peace, and most times, if not all, those charges are dropped or beaten in court. The police don’t care, they get away with silencing Rebel news, just like the prime ministers security detail gets away with pushing David into a wall.

how is it that you can respond to anything I say without asking for a definition, but you get hung up on support? See? These are the games you play and exactly what I’m talking about when I say you are playing games. You have taken a simple question, and turned it into several responses and still not actually answered the question.

You say this... but then didn't post anything to support it.

Did you order the code red?!

So, once again, you got nothing.

Lets try this again: How about, instead of asking questions, you show us where Musk supports Hitler, Nazi's or anything like that.

How about, instead of asking questions, you show us where Musk supports Hitler, Nazi's or anything like that.

Lets make this clear as mud, and I will focus on one response of yours from before. I asked if YOU supported the deportation of illegal immigrants and your response was to say a country has that right. So, yes, you answered, yes you responded, yes you did answer again when I asked this... but you didn't actually answer the question. Its stuff like this that leads me to say you are playing games. Even now, when I asked you point blank again, you still do not directly answer, you give me some vague response about how you support a country enforcing its laws, how they enforce their laws.

You are missing the whole point, so let me narrow it back down for you: You asserted he was sent to charge security. So... where does the video show that? The security detail grabbed him, pushed him, and continued to shove him into the wall. Where do you get the motive that he was sent to charge security? If you are now saying, oh well, the video clip doesn't show what you said it did, then you admit you were wrong and then what was the whole point of this exercise of yours in pushing and continuing to push your wrong view that is not supported?

This is even worse for you. This wasn't even the incident I was thinking of; he was just standing around in this one. You asserted he was sent to charge security. So... where does the video show that? The security detail grabbed him, pushed him, and continued to shove him into the wall. Where do you get the motive that he was sent to charge security? Then they let him go and walked away. No charges. Nothing. Then you sit here saying Rebel News was wrong? I guess you now support the government security details of the Prime Minister having zero accountability and getting to manhandle and assault people standing on the sidewalk?

Except, you declared earlier that: "2. No I don't." When I said it appears you support open borders madness. So, I am putting your claim to the test. And now you balk. Fair enough, who knows what your motives are, but the outcome is the same. You obfuscate and avoid the discussion. More games, but glad to see you say you do in fact support them in the enforcement of immigration laws. Lets see how that plays out in future discussions. This is good, I appreciate the clarity here now, but you did not say if you support a country enforcing its deportation of illegal immigrants; you just said a country has a right to do it. Do you support that though?

From what I have seen so far, looks like the cieling caught fire, perhaps due to the sparklers they were handing out. Reminds me of the Station Night Club Fire here many years ago when Great White had the pyro inside that caught the cheap, highly flammable sound insulation on fire. It could very well be that they had an over capacity crowd that night, exceeding regulations. What I do know is that when I go places I am always aware of the fire exits, because even for as much at fault the bar that Great White was playing in was at fault, they had emergency exits, but everyone ran for the front door and got wedged in. People were stacked up in the door way and burned alive. People in a crisis revert to what they know, their brains know they came in the entrance so they want to go out the same way. Very important to know where the exits are, plan ahead.

The cowards you support climb out of the holes they hide in wearing their uniforms when it is time to oppress their own people some more after a ceasefire.