gatomontes99

It isn't an open question. 18 U.S.C. § 115 - (Threatening Public Officials) prohibits killing public officials (cops and ICE included). 18 U.S. Code § 373 - (Solicitation to commit a crime of violence makes) what Don Lemon said illegal. What fantasy world are you living on?

It yielded nothing that would support your thesis. Mostly Rittenhouse and one guy in Houston that shot an off duty cop, not in uniform, in self defense. Do you have anything?

That is what the judicial system is for. Yep. Name a country that let's you shoot government officials you disagree with.

Are you being pedantic just to be annoying? No, Americans can't just go around shooting government officials just because they disagree. Further, illegal aliens that take up arms become enemy combatants and will be dealt with appropriately. The second amendment is for defense. When they wrote the Constitution, there was a real threat that France would invade the fledgling country. The primary purpose of 2A was to have citizens that were acquainted with fire arms. If they knew how to shoot, then they could be taught to march and fight much faster. Hence "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State". A well regulated militia meant a properly function militia. Further, Hamilton argued, in Federalist no. 29, that the militias would be state run and would prevent the federal government from becoming tyrannical. So, yes, 2A is about maintaining freedom and states' rights. No, it does not give an individual the ability to pop a cap in an ICE agent.

No. The premise that ICE is doing something illegal is utterly false. If we ever get to tyranny, then you can pull out the guns. This isnt tyranny. This is enforcing the laws we voted on.

So you are ok with revictimizing those victims that don't want to come forward? You are ok with implying innocent people that happened to be Epstein adjacent are guilty? Sure you are.

Naive. Do you actually think these mercenaries wouldn't be in Ukraine without US funding? Talk to any American serviceman and they will tell you that the State Department is funding the American mercenaries in Ukraine. They just don't do it directly.

RCP "DON LEMON: Black people, brown people of all stripes, whether you're an Indian American or a Mexican American, or whoever you are, go out in your place where you live and get a gun legally, get a license to carry legally. Because when you have people knocking on your door and taking you away without due process as a citizen, isn't that what the Second Amendment was written for? Go back and read what the Second Amendment says. And perhaps it will knock some sense in the heads of these people who are saying, well, it's all great. I don't believe they're doing it without due process. They're asking people for papers. They're not really beating people up. These people are doing things that are illegal. Nobody is illegal. It is a misdemeanor to cross the border." ********** Well, isnt that just peachy. Don Lemon is saying that if you think what ICE is doing than you should kill them. Kash Patel should arrest him for inciting iolence against public officials.

He responded in kind.

So.....no? Then why post?

There is plenty of evidence. You've been shown the evidence. But the evidence aligns with reality rather than your fantasy. So you refuse to acknowledge it.

Lmao...oh how naive you are. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60669763

Please get help.

NO! He will run away and pretend he never saw this. That is what he did the last 12 times he saw it.

Every single point I made, is true. You just don't want it to be. So you refuse to accept it. Quite honestly, I've never seen anyone try so hard to justify being a total piece of shit. Two completely separate issues here. First, the Department of War is a rebranding that highlights the purpose of our military. They are there to kill people and break things. They must be physically and mentally prepared to go to war to defend our national interests. That isn't fascist. Every country has a military with the same purpose. Second, JFK and LBJ both used our national guard to deal with violence in the past. The use of the NG for that purpose is not fascist. Trump didn't create DOGE. It already existed as the USDS (United States Digital Services). Trump just changed their scope and name. How ironic that you would name DOGE (tasked with reducing the size of the government) as an example of bloated government and proof of fascism when it did the exact opposite. Is that why he is eliminating the Department of Education and refusing to take up abortion, stating it should be a state issue? Kind of odd that an authoritarian, fascist is moving big chunks of the government over to the states. Literally none of that is true. Nor have you done anything to prove any of those assertions. Really? Grasping at straws are we? Let's say the trade policies are "bizarre", that doesn't prove he is fascist. It just proves that you don't like it. LMAO...no...implementing new trade strategies that benefit your country is not fascism. Do you even know what fascism is? I will tell you what it is not. It is not anything you don't like. That appears to be your working definition. Now, let's play your game my way: (with actual sources) Element of Fascism Met by Biden Admin? Examples / Notes Authoritarian Leadership ✅Yes Open borders, Weaponized DOJ against christians Extreme Nationalism ✅ Yes Biden embraced economic nationalism Militarism ✅Yes Got us into wars in Ukraine and Gaza Use of Military Against Civilians ✅ Yes Authorized the use of deadly force by our military when engaging US Citizens in our country Suppression of Dissent ✅Yes Labeled all opponents as a danger to democracy, Suppressed free speech online, Used FBI as hook to suppress dissent Scapegoating of Races ✅ Yes Said white men are all racist and the most dangerous terrorists Used Immigration to Suppress Citizen Voters ✅Yes Used Motor Voter registration and ghost SSNs to register illegal aliens to vote Disdain for Democracy / Electoral Integrity ✅ Yes Attempted to remove Trump from the ballot, Propaganda and Control of Narrative ✅Yes Used Intelligence officials to debunk a truthful laptop report, Created fake intelligence to delegitimize Trump, Fake News "bloodbath" comment, Fake News "fine people on both sides" etc. Takeover of Cultural Institutions ✅Yes Required girls sports to accept male athletes whether public or private Anti-Intellectualism ✅Yes False statements about covid vaccines with no proof and didn't allow debate Corporate-State Merger ✅Yes Accepted bribes in Ukraine for US tax payer money Cult of Personality ✅Yes Obama Use of Violence or Threats ✅Yes Biden threatens to beat up Trump

Do you ever plan on contributing to the discussion? Or is that to much to ask?

No, I condemned it on the condition that your source didnt lie about it. I made that very clear. I don't trust you or your source.

I reject your premise. You ignore that fascists don't withdraw from wars, they star them. You ignore that fascists promote a centralized government rather than local governments. You ignore that fascists create massive beauracracies rather than tearing them down. You ignore that fascists tend to be isolationist rather than trade partners. Then you try to prove your point by blatantly mischaracterizing Trump's policies. You call him authoritarian for not using Democrats, this go around. You call him an extreme nationalist because he acknowledges China hates us and he is enforcing the immigration laws as they are written. You say he is employing militarianism even though he was the first president in forever to not enter a war just because he glorifies the military (just like every D has done). You claimed using the military is a sign of fascism even though JFK and LBJ did the exact same thing. You claimed he suppressed dissent without any actual suppression (unlike Biden who censored dissent online and sent the FBI after groups he didnt like). You claimed he had disdain for Democracy when it was the left that called him an illegitimate president, impeached him for things he didn't do, tried to undermine his presidency by creating false intelligence and then indicted him 96 times to try to keep him from running again. The funniest claim is that he used Propaganda when 60 minutes altered Harris answers in a failed attempt to make her sound coherent along with the near 100% negative reporting from the MSM. I think you get the point. You are lying and inciting violence against Republicans and conservatives and you are unrepentant.

Really? I literally used the word condemned. And you reacted to that post: I guess you were laughing at the thought of killing a politician and his family?

Don't be a pos. That type of post is what got Trump and Kirk shot. It also got 2 illegals killed at an ICE facility, and a $50K bounty on ICE agents. You know that. You do it any way. That is the definition of a pos.

My bad.

No one is saying that challenging Trump makes you a despicable piece of shit. He was strictly saying he wouldn't call Republicans fascists or nazis. People that call Republicans and conservatives fascits/Nazis are despicable pieces of shit.

See a psychiatrist. Please.

So... Of course they would attack the guy for not being a despicable piece of shit. Oh, and he is voting to keep the government open. Being reasonable and having even the slightest hint of decorum is a problem for Democrats.