gatomontes99

There was no deadly insurrection. There was a riot that lead to an unarmed female rioter getting shot. But there was zero evidence that suggested any government organizational efforts behind the riot.

New York AG Letitia James indicted in Virginia after investigation by Trump's DOJ Virginia has indicted Letitia James for lying on her real-estate paperwork. She claimed the home was her permanent residence when it was not. Didn't Adam Schitforbrains do the same thing?

And you are trying to get conservatives killed by using rhetoric that you know incites violence and assassinations.

Please don't post pictures form a certain posters timeliness. lol

You are clearly trying to justify his murder by creating a narrative that his debate tactics were invalid. As for the video, I'm not buying what the tranny is saying. He is taking elements of the speech and redefining them with the clear goal of distorting the argument. The argument was that a typical passenger will question whether a pilot is qualified because of their minority status. They would do that because the airline expressly stated they would use minority status as a qualification rather than actual qualifications. The use of an example (like Harvard) solidifies that there are situations in which minority hiring replaced qualified hiring with disastrous consequences. Also, the tranny claimed hiring isn't a zero sum game, but it literally is. They don't hire an infinite number of employees. Hiring based on discriminatory practices is widely considered inappropriate. In addition, the tranny claimed Charlie made up a scenario. Since Charlie was speculating about whether the pilot was fully qualified and discussing what a hypothetical passenger might think, an example with extreme incompetence is not an unfair or inaccurate assumption. As for the claim that an instructor would lose his/her license for passing a poor pilot is 1000% false. First, instructors don't test pilots. The FAA and their designees check pilots. Designees don't have a "license"threy can lose. They have a Letter of Authorization to test on behalf of the FAA. Unless their actions are grotesquely inappropriate, the worst that can happen is that they will lose their LOA. As for their checkrides, they use a set of criteria that are published by the FAA, but are somewhat subjective. Meaning, some designees (aka check airmen) can be harder on their pilots and some can be far more foregiving. Further, every airline has their own training program and grading system with subjective standards. Their scenarios are created by the airline's training department, using FAA guidelines that score activities. Each scenario must reach a minimal level. However, the scenarios are well known by the pilots, so they can over perform by knowing what is coming. In short, the video is full of fallacies disguised as informed criticism. As someone that is intensely familiar with airline training and the varying levels of competence among pilots, I don't have major issue with what Charlie Kirk said. The true problem is not whether or not the pilots are qualified. The true problem, as highlighted by Kirk, is that the populous will view minorities through a hyper critical lense. DEI is a disservice to minorities that have earned their positions. They are good. They are qualified. Yet, people speculate because they don't know if DEI gave them an advantage.

You are comparing people that want a smaller government whose laws are obeyed to a guy that killed 6 million people and you don't think that is exaggerated?

Let us see if this one holds. I am a little hopeful since Egypt is more involved and more invested than before.

No, fùck you aṣṣhole. You are using encindiary language that you KNOW leads to people dying and you do it any way. You clearly won't be happy until your enemies are dead.

You can find 1000 videos like that. All the south side, black people telling the 5% approval rating Mayor to get the fùck out of the way.

You guys, especially you @robosmith, need to stop it with the exaggerated rhetoric. You are literally causing people to kill Americans. Of course he's was a LWNJ: He hated the Catholic Church, Jews, the SCOTUS and ICE. All the enemies de jure in the LWNJ play book.

@robosmith won't be happy until he sees us all dead.

I like how he makes excuses for the blatant sexism. It is so typically them.

Delaying a vote to verify all votes were properly tabulated is against the law? I don't think so.

Nailed it!

My friend married a Russian. Maybe he should be surveillance as well.

Peaceful? Are you nucking futs?

Charlie Kirk was killed because this type of attitude has become increasingly popular on the left: Dem AG Nominee Jay Jones Fantasized About Shooting Former Virginia GOP Speaker: ‘He Receives Both Bullets’ If you think that is a lie, here is the commentary on his pathetic attempt at an appology: Va. attorney general nominee apologizes for violent text messages about former GOP House Speaker But they aren't just pushing violence on Conservarives, they are also making increasingly sexist attacks as well: Pritzker, of course, is saying that pretty girls can't possibly be qualified to lead. This is not surprising from the party that pushes men in girls sports. No Democrat has asked Jay Jones to withdraw from the race or condemned Pritzker for his extremely sexist comments. No, they support these two men.

Hitler wasn't like Hitler and Trump isn't like Hitler so Trump and Hitler are the same! Honestly, though, this rhetoric is a threat to every conservative member of this forum and every conservative in the United States. You don't try to kill us because we are Nazis. You call is Nazi so you can kill us.

Why do you bring that up? The warrant said they organized J6.

Not if the warrants are gained under false pretenses.

It was the CIA and the CIA hid the evidence. So, no, no one could find the evidence. Manafort, yes. Page, fu k no. The CIA had their "friends" (Australian ambassador I believe) feed Carter Page fake information and then used the fake info Carter was told as a reason to spy on him.

If they were spying on Russian operatives then why did they make up intelligence that they used to get a warrant to tap phone lines to Trump's staff? You cant just make shit up.

I think it's option 3: you are trying to using name calling and false bravado to hide that you are desperately inferior in your debate skills.

Republicans: Killed drug runners Deported illegal aliens Found a bunch of wast fraud and abuse Democrats: Faked Russian collusion intelligence Used faked intelligence to impeach a president Spied on Republican senators Spied on incoming president Used FBI to investigate parents at school board meetings Used FBI to investigate Catholic Church as a political enemy Illegally appointed a special council Committed three acts of banana republic style persecution on a former President Used the CIA, FBI and White House to strong arm sociak media companies into censoring citizens Allowed millions of illegal aliens into the country, gave them free health care, housing, food and spending money while registering them to vote And @robosmith has the nerve to suggest the people that voted for Republicans are blindly following the party? Of course he does.