gatomontes99

Do you actually believe that?

Cbs? Nbc? Neither of those local stations brought it up.

They sure did ignore the science when the science debunked their pseudo science.

It literally didn't make the news here. Must bot have been so awesome.

Ooohhh noes! Political persecutions? That is some the same as Decarlos Brown Jr and the thousands of violent felons who robbed and killed!

Given the left's propensity for releasing convicted felons, they just might.

And she lied to you, omitting newer studies that debunked her claims.

Or, you know, cognizant of reality.

Nope: Just because some are nut jobs in furry costumes doesnt mean other nut jobs aren't being violent.

They are protesting the US having a king...when they have a king. They are mòrons.

As usual, the science does not support the left: ********** Live Science - It made for a neat story. People physiologically prone to fear and disgust would pay more attention to threats and thus turn to a conservative political ideology that promises safety and the status quo. But there was a lingering problem. Seventy-five percent of the research cited on the topic in one influential 2003 meta-analysis was done in the United States, and only 4% was conducted outside of Western democracies. Another problem? The definition of "threat" in most studies on the topic was usually narrow, focused on threats of violence or terrorism. Political persuasion was often defined narrowly too, without accounting for differences between social ideology and economic ideology. If you look only at the United States, the researchers report, it's true that right-wing beliefs and a fear of war or terrorism go hand-in-hand. But expanding to other threats shows an inconsistent mix of associations. In other words, even in the U.S., conservatism and a physical sensitivity to threats aren't clearly linked. "It's definitely plausible that people experience some threat or some event and then adopt this attitude," he said. "But what 'this attitude' is and the best one to address that threat might be different depending on the particular context." There may also be other psychological reasons to associate with a political group, Malka noted. People have a social need to fit in, and may adopt attitudes that help them do so. Future research should focus more on how pre-existing political affiliation leads people to focus on different threats, he told Live Science. **********

We are not afraid of liberal policies. We just know they don't work. Your presumption that fear and conservatism are correlated is an emotional response to piece of information you want to be true. He says with a full throated, angry, emotional response.

I was talking about how liberals make emotional, anger basdd responses to facts and you chimed in to prove me correct. Even if what you said about immigration was correct, my response was an intellectual response using logic and reason. Your response was an emotional eruption of anger. You have proven me correct once again.

He's not wrong. But you illustrate my point perfectly. In her video, she claims that conservatives get angry when presented with facts. However, I said she is liberal and lacking empathy so she is projecting her reactions. Then you come along and prove me right by having an emotional, anger based reaction to facts. Thus disproving her thesis.

Lmao...she has no empathy. We use logic. Fear is an emotion. It does not play. We are not afraid of illegal immigrants. We know that illegal immigration leads to immigrants getting raped or killed, lower wages, job losses for legal residents and higher social program costs. There is no fear of that. That is what it is. She has no empathy because she doesn't understand what logic is. She uses emotion as her thinking tool. So she assumes that we do the same. She is wrong, as are you. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cognitive dissonance Just One Definition

They are demonstrating against America because our elected officials is a king? What moroʻns.

Yes. I am pretty sure that is the entire controversy. Some of those girls were well under age.

I think some of them were underage.

Not when they protest as furries. These people are not serious. They are not even sane. Like, if I was protesting something (which i dont because I have testosterone and a little pride) I am pretty sure that if a furry walked up I would tell it to get lost. But these people welcome these losers! That may be even more mentally ill than believing you are a cat or unicorn or some bullshit.

Screen_Recording_20251017_213156_YouTube.mp4

He actually thinks he won. Lol. No. It is based on the left's misunderstanding of what 2A signifies, as illustrated by you. It also illustrates the lefts' love affair with political violence.

There is nothing Don Lemon's words that is open to interpretation.

"Donald Trump suggested that "Second Amendment people" might be able to do something to prevent Hillary Clinton from appointing judges who could overturn the Second Amendment, which drew significant criticism for implying a violent interpretation. His campaign later clarified that he was referring to the political power and unity of gun rights supporters." https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-gun-rights-supporters-can-something-stop-clinton Did you really make me get multiple statutes and make multiple posts over several hours and you had no fùcking clue what you were talking about?! Cmon man. Do better.

He is saying you need help. Go see a psychiatrist.

These Americans died fighting in Ukraine, now their parents have a message for President Trump: ‘Freedom isn’t just for America’ We have war fighters there and we are paying them for Ukraine. Sure, the money isnt direct, so we deny everything. But talk to any serviceman and they will tell you exactly how it works.