gatomontes99

Caption: When a liberal government builds a fence.

This should end the thread: ********* AP: In dozens of interviews in villages on Venezuela’s breathtaking northeastern coast, from which some of the boats departed, residents and relatives told Garcia Cano the dead men had indeed been running drugs but were not narco-terrorists, as alleged by the Trump administration, or leaders of a cartel or gang. *********** They were running drugs. ********** AP: Most of the nine men were crewing such craft for the first or second time, making at least $500 per trip, residents and relatives said. They were laborers, a fisherman, a motorcycle taxi driver. Two were low-level career criminals. One was a well-known local crime boss who contracted out his smuggling services to traffickers. ************ Notice how they all were paid by the cartel, several were criminals and one was in charge was known to do it for multiple cartels. AND NO ONE DENIES THEY WERE RUNNING DRUGS TO AMERICA. NOT ONE.

And now I have to go get some cereal for the morning.

But that is the scam! Set up a system that will fail. When it starts to fail, subsidize it (and skim a little for yourself), then when it does fail, blame Republicans and claim it wasn't done right. This scam has been applied to every major progressive/liberal policy since the early 1900s.

Fùck European standards. They have no rights. They are all subjects of their government.

Or maybe: Between 2019 and 2023, nearly 17,000 Christians were killed in targeted attacks in Nigeria, with over 7,000 reported in just the first seven months of 2025. And: A new report has found that ethnic and religious violence in Nigeria has claimed the lives of nearly 56,000 people in the West African country over four years — and the victims were disproportionately Christian. So, maybe, there is a true humanitarian need? Not that you care.

Psst...don't tell @robosmith that CNN has democrats with similar, if not worse, polling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26211915/cnn-poll-trump-midterms-east-wing-parties.pdf 37/69% favorable/unfavorable And they have the Republicans at 45/48% favorable/unfavorable.

How about addressing what I actually said instead of this strawman?

Yes you do. What else has a chance to outrun the coast guard?

He's lying.

No, it wasn't. The stock market was up but less than inflation. Jobs were up but only because they cooked the books. The GDP was up but only because the government spent so damn much money. https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20250118238/the-biden-economy-just-how-good-was-it-here-are-the-highs-and-lows-for-the-46th-president The yearly rate of inflation rose from a scant 1.4% - a level considered precariously low - when Biden took office in January 2021 to a peak of 9.1% in the middle of 2022. It was the worst outbreak of inflation since the early 1980s. Gross domestic product, considered the official scorecard for the economy, surged 6.1% in 2021. The growth spurt was fueled by the Biden stimulus and the ensuing rebound from the coronavirus pandemic. GDP rose 2.5% in 2022, 2.9% in 2023, and it's likely to have expanded close to 3% in Biden's final year in office. While high government spending has played a role in the robust GDP, the economy has benefited most from low unemployment, rising incomes and strong consumer spending. https://www.heritage.org/markets-and-finance/commentary/labor-department-admits-hundreds-thousands-biden-jobs-were-fake Labor Department Admits Hundreds of Thousands of Biden Jobs Were Fake

Maybe we should.

Didnt fire a singlenshot? So the Charlie Kirk.just spontaneously blow a neck artery? Did the ICE shooters just throw flowers? Did Trump just scratch himself? Stop this bullshit. You all are shooting. Why shouldnt we shoot back? What's stopping us from taking out Jay Jones or ZM?

I am not playing your stupid games. You never contribute anything useful. fùck, you are part of the "they". The violent left that has taken over the D party. As far as I am concerned, everyone on the left is a bunch of violent a-holes. I don't either. But it is how I feel. I don't see any way to talk to these people any more. They've lost it. What else can we do?

After the election of Jay Jones, I am completely disheartened by the left. They tried, twice, to kill DJT. They did kill Charlie Kirk. They have shot at ICE on multiple occasions. Thry riot and try to hurt the police and burn down or loot businesses. Why should we not engage them? To be clear, I am in no way going to go out shooting at people. That will never happen. I respect life too much to be like that. But I'll be damned if I can find a good reason (other than respecting life) to not just go kill some people on the left. They literally elected a man that fantasized about killing his political opponent AND HIS KIDS and talked about how satisfying it would be to watch the wife/mother hold their lifeless bodies. Because that would some how change things. Someone shown me something that makes the left redeemable. Give me hope for them. Because all I see right now is a violent mob attempting to take over government by any means necessary.

Yes we did and we talked about how the stimulus primarily added government spending rather than private sector growth. The GDP is the sum of private sector sales and government spending. As private sector sales slumped, Biden printed money, hired more people and frivilously spent money on illegal aliens and fraudulent NGOs. While they could say the GDP grew and jobs increased, the reality was the more important private sector was shrinking. We even found out a few months ago that the job growth was based on faked numbers. So, even the massive government hiring did not actually counter the job losses in the private sector.

I wasn't talking about ZM. I was talking about bad decision the left is making.

The left elected an Attorney General that Fantasized About killing his opponents children and the satisfaction he would get from watching their mom hold their lifeless bodies. I think it is safe to say that talking with the left is useless.

Oh yeah. That is why I call it the propaganda arm of the DNC.

You quoted Brady originally. Those other outlets got it wrong. It doesnt matter if they are conservative. Here is what was in Miller that proves my point: "Most if not all of the States have adopted provisions touching the right to keep and bear arms. Differences in the language employed in these have naturally led to somewhat variant conclusions concerning the scope of the right guaranteed. But none of them seems to afford any material support for the challenged ruling of the court below." Justia As the ruling in Miller states, the right exists and the only debate was the scope. This ruling guaranteed the individual right, with limits. We can all agree that there are limits. Miller backed that notion. Heller changed the scope. Heller, in fact, restated previous rulings and expressly conveyed that: "(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47." Justia So, not only did Miller state that individuals have a right (with some limits), but Heller made the same argument while expanding the right to exclude the limits placed by D.C. and expressly stating that they DID NOT differ from previous rulings.

Let us see how any of those that said they were fleeing actually leave.

What happened to no one is above the law?

Well, what was a lie?

No. You did not give me an authoritative source. You don't get to quote a lwnj and then appeal to authority when your authority is just a lwnj that is promoting the same fantasies you want to be true. I quoted the rulings. If you want to prove me wrong, bring up the actual rulings, like I did.

I am not wrong. You are getting analysis from a biased source that wants guns banned. I am getting my information directly from the words of the ruling. My sources are unfiltered and accurate. Yours have a spin. That is why your opinions were inconsistent and wrong.