gatomontes99

It is diplomacy. He negotiated what he wanted and what was in the best interest of his country. Just because he is a strong leader does not make his leadership immoral. Maybe you don't like him because he puts America's interests first? Maybe you don't like him because he does not act like a helpless, effeminate cuck?

Prove it.

So three pseudo paragraphs of personal attacks and no substance. It took all of two replies to break you down.

Are they an ally if we are the only ones contributing a meaningful amount of money? Are they an ally if they buy our enemy's oil? Are they an ally?

Its like you want to prove me correct!

And yet they are doing a better job of meeting their obligations and he got part of Greenland. Sure sounds like they are handling him, doesn't it?

That world order left the US spending $22T on European defense. More than every NATO country combined and 2/3rds of our debt. The world order needs to be upended. Maybe NATO needs to end. The US is the only nation that takes it seriously. The rest make promises and then don't keep them. It is time to stop trusting them and move on. Maybe that is why we took over parts of Greenland.

You do such a good job of that too. Just like the great Don Quixote.

The pics are nice, but the writing in Hustler is top shelf! Thanks for proving the premise of this thread.

He brought doughnuts and coffee to the group He said "We are going..." numerous times. He clearly colored his commentary in support of the group. To say he wasn't part of the group is like saying the coach wasn't part of the team.

NATO thinks it is a good thing:

Not watchable

The Art of the Deal:CBS Greenland will stay sovereign. The US gets to build up military support. The left still does not get it. Trump goes in hard, acts like a bull in a China shop and then gets the deal done on the terms he actually wanted. He never wanted to own Greenland. He just wanted to have a military base so that Russia and China would not. Look, Russia and China would never invade North America proper. They aren't capable. But they would invade Greenland. It would be easy to take and it would be a huge strategic advantage that they could use as a negotiating chip. Trump just put that chip in his pocket. It's gone. Once our base is up and running, Greenland will be secure.

Walz is such a bufoon.

If Trump has taught us anything it is that the left is to be ignored. They control those polls. Don't let them fool you into believing Americans are against ICE. They are not. They might be against a few incidents ts that have been portrayed poorly. But they are not against ICE.

I literally posted a link to an article of a Senate Democrat Majority Leader (in Virginia I believe) that authored and proposed a bill to eliminate minimum mandatory sentencing for people that distribute kiddy porn. So yes, there is at least one and numerous people voted for him and the Senate Democrats chose him as their leader. So it is safe to say that your side is protecting pedophiles.

They don't but we can see who they have arrested: WOW.DHS.GOV

He posted 2 hours ago. But you know that. I am guessing you think this lame demand proves something?

If he committed murder and was charged with murder, would his sexual preferences or skin color have anything to do with it? Because, he did violate both the FACE Act and the KKK Act. Bringing his skin color and sexual preference in it is just a way of trying to intimidate the DOJ. He thinks his liberal preference points mean something. He thinks that his skin color and sexual preferences make him above the law.

No. They disapprove of the leftist spin of what ICE is doing. They overwhelmingly want deportations.

Read the rest: “Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose,” the memo reads. The memo says agents may “arrest and detain aliens” in their places of residence who are subject to final orders of removal issued by immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals, or U.S. district or magistrate judges. The memo says under general guidelines that officers and agents using a method called Form I-205 must “knock and announce” and that “in announcing, officers and agents must state their identity and purpose.” It says that officers and agents must give the people inside time to comply with the order. It also says that they generally should not enter a residence before 6 a.m. or after 10 p.m., and that they "should only use a necessary and reasonable amount of force” to enter a home.

That is not what they said. They said the need an Administrative Warrant rather than a Judicial Warrant. However the Administrative Warrant is only valid IF a Judge has signed a final order of removal. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ice-policy-officers-enter-homes-immigration-without-judicial-warrant-rcna255305

Unlike Ms. Good.

If only I had an example. Oh wait, here's one:

Gutfeld apparently reads this forum. He perfectly described numerous lefties here. He has a great point though. We waste a lot of time explaining stuff that is obvious like the sky is blue and someone with a schlong isn't a woman.