gatomontes99

It is not a coincidence. California was burning and Newsome needed a distraction...BOOM...LA riots Walz is caught red handed...BOOM...MN riots.

You keep saying that. But what is that? Doesn't look like the phone you claimed it was.

Yes, ICE pushed her. But then this guy jumped on her and ICE had to pull him off. He wouldn't let go either.

Lmao...it's right there! You clearly don't want to see it.

Occam's razor: all things being equal, the simplest answer that requires the fewest assumptions tends to be the right answer. This guy impeded ICE, assaulted a woman then assaulted ICE before it was revealed that he had a gun. This is his fault.

Funny thing: Sky looked pretty neon green that night. Lol That's a real, unedited pic I took. So strange you said neon green. lol

Do you see the gun now?

Here is the gun falling out of his hand as he gets shot: Here is the long video of him assaulting some random woman: There is a video of an agent running away with a gun. It may have been the assailants. It may not. If it was, we know another gun fell from his hand as he was shot. Also, the agent ran as shots were fired, not before. Thats a lie. I posted the video that definitively showed the gun falling from his hand.

He reached for it and you can see it in this video and you can hear the ICE agents yelling "He's got a gun" as he is fighting after being maced and attacking some woman. https://x.com/i/status/2015176060019646568

I posted videos and none of that happened.

Joe Biden did one or two presses a year. Trump does one or two a day. This lie that Trump is somehow declining because in one year he had a handful of times that seemed less coherent is absurd. Call me when they dress up a staffer in a Bunny suit to dog walk Trump away from the press.

Does it not bother you that you have to lie to make your position tenable?

Well, legal or not, he fought with an officer and brandished a weapon. What was supposed to happen? What other possible outcome could there be? In the first video you can see the gun. Watch at the end whe they halo the gun.

Ironic that a LWNJ would call the right Xenophobes while supporting a group that means to destroy all the Jews in Israel and any group that attacks, intimidates and insults Jews under the guise of protest

Bullshit. The poll above was Democrats on Democrats. Trump has a 90% approval rating with Republicans. Does it not bother you that every single position you take is based on a lie?

I gave you links to news articles that disproved those claims. You being hysterical doesn't make it unconstitutional.

OK, no. What they did is apply the definition that was the intended definition. The SCOTUS will determine if the original definition applies. The SCOTUS did strike down the nationwide injuction. That is a sign that they intend to rule in favor of the President. AP That is called a recission. It is a viable tool the President has. Rescissions 101: Key Facts The president can request rescissions via a special message to Congress. Presidents of both parties have used this authority since 1974, though it has been used less frequently since 2000. This is neither unconstitutional nor a first amendment issue. It may be immoral or unethical, but it is not as you described. Which calls into question why they lost their security clearances. Is it because they were against Trump or did they do something wrong? Bring the hammer down on Perkins Coie and every other player in the Russigate scandal Oh, that's right. They were envolved in President Obama's scheme to create fake intelligence to discredit President Elect Trump. In so doing, these law firms misused their security clearances to undermine a duly elected President and the fair, democratic election. But don't let facts get in the way of a good hysterical scream. The students did not lose their visas for speech. They lost their visas because they threatened and intimidated Jewish students. That level of antisemitism will not be tolerated. Would you agree that white South Africans that threatened and intimidated black students should get the same treatment? The Trump administration says it's going to take a tough stance on antisemitism. Now, one way they're going to try and do that is by signing an executive order - that's what the president did last week - that aims to deport international students who've participated in university protests over the war in Gaza. Good. So what? The Constitution says the government CAN fund science and art. It does not say they have to. In fact, the government does pick and choose what they sponsor. They used to fund space exploration through NASA. Not so much now. They could choose to shutdown SETI or not fund certain field studies of tornados. So they certainly don't have to fund anything to do with gender studies. In fact, you only want them to do it because of a political bent. But politics is not supposed to taint science. So how can the government fund such programs as a result of their political motivations? To do so ruins any scientific findings a.la. global warming. Lol, no. The government owns your ssn. If they want to look at it, they can. Yeah, one judge wrote one opinion. He even acknowledged that his opinion was so full of shit that there was no way the SCOTUS would uphold it. But, nice try. It was clear to him, he explained, that the Supreme Court would overrule such relief given recent decisions the court had issued on related matters. At least he knew he was full of shit. I give him props for that. That dipshit judge tried to get the government to turn around a jet that was damn near ready to land. Even if they could have gotten the message to them, they almost certainly didn't have the gas to return. He was later over ruled any way.

It was just a magistrate judge. They will refile the charges with a judge whose wife doesn't work for a lwnj poli.

Your hysterical reaction does not make anything that is being done unconstitutional.

Interesting lie. On one hand I don't care because he is just a blowhard. On the other hand this is like that Erika Jordan nut job. He tried to use this appeal to authority fallacy by lying about his qualifications and positioning himself as an authority so his opinions are educated and unquestionable. Now we know they are not educated and the questions are more than valid.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cnn-data-guru-reveals-awful-awful-awful-reality-for-dems/ar-AA1UQizF 57% of Democrats disaprove of Democrats. Let that sink in. With Jeffries failing to stop 149 of his own party in the budget vote, you would think he would be the problem that voters identify. It is actually Harry. Go figure.

You mean the law. The law that we all agreed upon through representatives we elected. The law we all abide by...until the left got TDS so bad they de ided it was more important to break the law than allow Trump to enforce it. If that were true, then your outrage would be hypocritical. Good news. You are not a hypocrite on this. Obama did not deport that many people. Most of those people were part of the hoards that were turned back at the border. Since we don't have illegals at the border at that same scale, the turnbacks are smaller. However, 2.2 million people have self deported and well over 100,000 more have been nabbed and shipped. This time next year, even Obama's inflated deportations will Peanuts in comparison. And you will still have TDS. I absolutely love everything we are doing.

No they have not done any of those things. Ask yourself why this has not happened in Texas, Florida, Oklahoma or any other red state. Because the people in those states are not rioting. The people in those states do not interfere with their operations. The governments in those states cooperate and arrests are made in jails. What you describe is a reaction to radicals rioting and attempting to bypass democratically instituted laws. What you describe is what must be done to protect the true and just laws of our Republic in the face of authoritarianism.

Not a bad argument. But it is wrong. The Administrative Warrant that ICE is using is supported by a Judicially signed Final Deportation Order. The memo says specifically that only the known residence of the illegal alien that the Final Deportation Order was issued for is an acceptable domicile for entry. It also prohibits forced entry without proper notification and sets limits on when they can do it. A LWNJ will, of course, strike this down. But the SCOTUS will uphold this.

The subpoena was bipartisan and unanimous.