-
Posts
7,694 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
61
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by gatomontes99
-
Oh, let's break it down: "Shhh" is his need to silence dissent. I want to ignore it and give it no credence. He wants me silenced all together. "Adults" as a reference to the party that regularly melts down if someone calls a trans person by their real sex? You have to be kidding me. They aren't adults, they can't even handle the slightest dissent or reality. "Drink your koolaid" is clearly an intent for me to comitt suicide. And that is supposed to counter this idea that the left is the assasination culture? This counters the terrorism acusation? No. He only furthers the supposition that the left is controlled by a blood lust. "Little boy" is part arrogance and part dismissive. Granted, I am being dismissive. At least I have an argument to stand on. His whole argument is a fantasy that his side of the aisle is the adults. That is laughably delusional. But that is the same party that thinks men can get pregnant, so it is right on brand. He is arrogant without merit while propagating a fantasy and dismissing any dissent without contradicting facts. A perfect example of how the left is trash and why the left should be ignored.
-
I am at a loss as to why we should debate, engage or in any way acknowledge anyone on the left. They have supported assainations and assaination attempts. They refuse to acknowledge the left wing terrorism problem that plagues the world. They are chronically wrong almost to the point that you have to assume it is intentional. They refuse to acknowledge reality. They play childish games. They are emotionally and intellectually dishonest on every front. They are irrational. Yet, somehow these brats keep getting attention. Why do we let them drive conversation. They are inconsequential trash. Take them to the landfill and let them go. I hate that I am at this point, but I just don't see a way forward where liberals/the left play a meaningful role. If they do, it will be highly destructive.
- 165 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
Border Patrol Kills Blind Refugee
gatomontes99 replied to TreeBeard's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
How many pages do we have to engage in on a thoroughly debunked premise? -
F15 downed, pilots safe
gatomontes99 replied to paxamericana's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
Democrats have a really bad week
gatomontes99 replied to Reg Volk's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Why is the carpet wet Todd! -
Lefty Cultists Pettifogging
gatomontes99 replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Let us be honest. You just wanted to use the term pettifogging. Lol You could have used this at any time in any topic. It is a fundamental tactic of the left. -
What does that have to do with caring? Caring is not the same as being the lone ranger. First, the war was only i years according to the most liberal assessments. The death counts vary wildly, but no reasonable account has any where near "many hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians." Don't you think that lying about facts makes you look bad? How does that not make you rethink your position. BTW, those terror attacks probably happen any way. And they came from...IRAN. Iran is gone now so this won't be like Iraq. Well, these matures have toppled 3 governments without even so much as a lost pencil, so I would say they are doing alright. But you lied about Hegseth. He had a background in the Military and EVERY...SINGLE...MISSION has been a huge success. Lie all you want, it just makes it easier to trust my gut.
-
Your assumptions about us are wrong. Every need to rush. The timing is right and if Democrats get in power again the moment would be lost. This is such horrible logic and it flies in the face of every intelligence assessment that is known. So the timing is right, they are developing a nuke and they have killed thousands of people. All conditions you have agreed exist. It is like you are making the case to do it. You sound like someone that is angrily screaming "I love you!" The tone doesn't match the words. Yes. There were some unintended consequences AND it took longer than expected ro calm the country down, mostly because of the unintended consequences. But, this is not Iraq. A) This is not an unprovoked attack. The list of attacks on US interests alone is massive and include attacks on our military personell, ships, and a contract to kill our president. Then add in things like Oct 7th and you will see that the biggest threat to peace and stability is Iran. An Iran in flux is far far far safer than the Iran on Friday last week. B.) No one thinks that Monday morning this will be sunshine, rainbows and lollipops. Kids are not going to be playing while parents sit around singing folk songs. This will take time. There will be set backs. But the highest likelihood is that Iran will be a safer, more stable participant in the world economy in 10 years than they were last week. You should know that we see your personal attacks as a badge of honor. First, it tells us that you know you lost a d that we are right. Second, we know that just about everything your side says is b.s. So we can rest assured we are anything but whatever you called us.
-
They killed 10,000+ people and they were restarting a nuclear program. There is every reason to rush because if another Biden gets elected there is zero chance that we would stop Iran from getting a Nuke. Zero. This is not about the world. This is about US. Iran is a major threat. Well....was. "Blah blah blah. TDS...TDS...FASCIST!" Whatever dude. Look at the Big picture. Venezuela can't supply our enemies with an oil market. Cuba is about to fall and their people will be liberated. The Mexican cartels are on the run. Russia lost a major revenue stream and just lost an arms supplier. Guess who is next? And China is sitting over there questioning their strategy. Because all of their allies are falling. They are being put in a corner. Either play nice with the US or be isolated and hope everything changes. Hope Vance/Rubio lose to who? AOC and Newsome? Kamala and a sock puppet? This move in Iran is stabilizing the ME and making everyone in the ME our friend. It is weakening Russia, China and North Korea. This was not necessary? I say it was mandatory. As do the citizens of Iran, who now view the country they once called the great satin as the great savior.
-
-
-
That is not what was said. What was said is that they were attempting to restart the program. This is a regime that killed 10,000+ people for protesting and you are playing stupid word games to satisfy your TDS. Wtf is wrong with you? Grow Up.
-
https://x.com/i/status/2027651077865157033
-
We Need the Search Feature Back
gatomontes99 replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Something about freezing/slowing access is the reason. -
Like when a President creates an intelligence brief that is fake a designed to undermine the in coming President? Would that count? Would a good example be dehumanizing critics/opposition by calling them fascists/nazis/racists? A. la. Minnesota? National Peace Institute? Would those qualify? Like when Eric Adams left the Democratic Party and was called all sorts of nasty names? Like when the radicals attacked AOC for not supporting violence against Israel or like when Fetterman says he gets the worst hate from his own party? Like KJP's book? Numerous stories about Hillary yelling and cussing at staff? Like white guilt? Like when they fawned over every word Joe Biden uttered, even if they didn't know what the word was? Like how Joe Biden was The Best President Of Our Time?
-
Looks like bombs will drop on the next week.
-
Willfully ignorant or just plain old ignorant? Constitution Center: Although the Elections Clause makes states primarily responsible for regulating congressional elections, it vests ultimate power in Congress. Congress may pass federal laws regulating congressional elections that automatically displace (“preempt”) any contrary state statutes, or enact its own regulations concerning those aspects of elections that states may not have addressed. The Framers of the Constitution were concerned that states might establish unfair election procedures or attempt to undermine the national government by refusing to hold elections for Congress. They empowered Congress to step in and regulate such elections as a self-defense mechanism.
