gatomontes99

Your post above says the claims were unsubstantiated. You should look up what that means. Hint: unsubstantiated and credible are antonyms.

Dude, you got pwned. They interfered. Trump said they interfered. Your idioť said they didn't. You posted it thinking that was true. You LIED!

Zero releases, sorry. Still a huge win over the last admin: DHS: Once again, we have a record low number of encounters at the border and the 7th straight month of zero releases.

WebMD: Sometimes, internal bleeding may occur after a less severe trauma. As the bleeding continues, symptoms appear and steadily get worse. Symptoms depend on the type of trauma and what body part was involved. Only a fool thinks that an injury like internal bleeding presents in one way and is obvious from the moment of trauma.

No you didn't. You went straight to the personal attacks.

Translation: you don't want to believe it so you won't.

No you have not. That is not what I said. I said that impeding officers prevents them from picking up pedos, rapists and wife beaters. I even posted videos and news articles that backed up those claims that you call inane. Does anyone have a translation for this? I don't speak angry liberal. Again, another post of you calling me names trying to dsprove that you call me names.

Venom? Those are verifiable facts.

Comedy gold

Train wreck? 0 illegal border crossings for something like 8 months Crime down to record low levels. Murder at record low levels. Unemployment down Work force participation up Core costs down Oil proces down USA Men and Women Hockey beat the Socialist state of Canda Venezuela can't help Russia, Iran or China Iran has fallen Cuba will fall Russia has lost 3 allies China had their defense system decimated in Iran 3 million illegals deported or self deported Housing costs down Government Fraud is being exposed every where A real budget is all but passed What is the failure here exactly?

Why do you always leave out that the agent was hit and sustained internal bleeding?

See! You do it all the time. He came back with a reasoned, rational response and you jump straight to the ad hominem attacks.

I won't ever feel bad for being right. You did not even provide a single fact or opinion to oppose what I said. All you have proposed is belittlement and name calling. Still going with the calling me names to prove you don't call me names when you've lost I see. Good talk Russ.

Biden Justice Department: Press Release Two Iranian Nationals Charged for Cyber-Enabled Disinformation and Threat Campaign Designed to Influence the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election And FBI: August 19, 2024 Joint ODNI, FBI, and CISA Statement on Iranian Election Influence Efforts Apparently unhinged in liberal speak means well aligned with reality.

Do you think that if you commit to the fantasy that it will eventually come true? Yeah, one of those was from crackhobarbie, not you. Any other excuses?

Because you are using your prejudices to make assumptions that don't align with reality.

No. /thread

You said I said two specific things. I did not. You lied. Now that we've moved the goal posts, I can address that. Nothing you posted above was either braindead or specious. Every response I posted above was a direct response that was (and still is) backed by facts. Take, for example, my response to crackhobarbie. It is true that those that call themselves protestors were really trying to impede ice because they wanted to stop deportations. Do you have information that proves me wrong? No. Because that is definitively as true as the sun is hot and the sky is blue and water is wet. The double tap post was backed by reporting: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gk7eg83eno And the Jim Crow comment is spot on. It is hardly braindead or specious. Now, the real point of this exercise is you, isn't it? You got called out for jumping to name calling when you know you've lost. To prove me wrong, you called me braindead and specious while posting examples of solid analysis that you did not like. To sum it up, because you probably don't get it, you just resorted to name calling in an attempt to disprove that you resort to name calling. Question: how many hours did you spend combing through my post history to find such weak examples?

I missed the part where I said anyone on the left supported the Ayatollah or that not supporting ICE made you pro-pedo. You failed to prove your point. You failed miserably.

Aaron Spencer, dad who killed daughter’s alleged molester, wins Republican primary for Lonoke County Sheriff The back story is that some asshoòle raped Aaron's daughter. Aaron killed him, but not until after the asshòle made bail. Then Aaron ran for sheriff....AND WON! Aaron thinks his defense will win, but his defense is it is ok to kill a child rapist. That clearly is not the law. Nor should it be. So Aaron will be convicted and not be sheriff. The big statement here is that voters want action. What Aaron did was illegal and should be. But it got the job done. And voters wanted that.

On that note:

Watch all the grass roots protesting that Nate Friedman found:

I guess that makes it a great straw man to knock down. This little diatribe proves my point.