gatomontes99

Isn't this the girl that claimed this all happened at a golf course that had not been built when she claimed it happened a d did not report it until after Trump was in poilitics? This was in the same files: Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the statement said. “To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.

When you hate reality so much that you try to insert a fantasy, reality becomes an irritant. These people need help adjusting ro reality. If you try to support their fantasy world, all you are doing is making the irritant that much more irritating.

Party of peace? I don't think so.

She never references anything. I am on ignore ore because I call you on your lies and back it up with facts. You and reality don't get along.

The Fed and the CBO use woefully inaccurate numbers. Have for as long as u have been paying attention to these matters (starting in the late 90's). The new budget is almost done and cuts a lot of spending. The tariffs are bringing in plenty of new revenue and growth over 4% will add even more revenue. We do need to do a lot more to cut spending, but that will only happen if we get rid of the threaten to fillabuster is a fillabuster rule. Once that is gone, a real deep cutting budget can be passed.

Fallacy of mamory?

No. That is a huge difference. Before Trump, that deficit increases every year. That fact that it dropped, even a little, is monumental. Wtf?

Deficit spending was high in the Biden years. It has been trimmed back under Trump. Growth was primarily in consumer spending and exports. So the tariffs that resulted in better trade deals gave us more exports.

GDP growth is the highest since 99. Jobs are growing despite the government shrinking by 10% Real wages are up You are a hard guy to please.

Wait...you bit him on the ass?

Funny how the left thinks that good news for Amerocans is bad news.

No no no. You implied she was not in porn. I blew that lie out of the water. You also said she was a psychologist, she is emphatically not a psychologist. This is what makes her b.s. so infuriating. Stupìd people believe that she is an authority. She is not. She is a grad student at an internship. She is the epitome of a novice. I have detailed how she has wrong on multiple occasions. She does not know her stuff. Any idiøt with a browser can prover her wrong. She does know how to use fallacies, though. I will give her that.

Getting desperate? You tend to get desperate the more a debate goes on. I just talk reality. That is all my man. You switched to this red herring topic qhen you couldn't defend the obvious threat on the POTUS's life. I just trashed this argument too because you clearly gave up on the first loser of an argument you made.

Another blue terrorist: She does not care that the guy they were looking for is a child rapist and murderer.

Lmao. oh boy. She is not a psycologist. She is a sociologist major and an intern. She isn't even a paid professional yet: And she has soft porn on her professional page: You don't even know who you are quoting. Here os here library of film work that includes "Escape From Pleasure Planet" and "Intergalactic Swingers": https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1246933-erika-jordan

The double tap was actually 4 strikes and the last 3 shots were meant to sink the remaining parts of the vessel because drugs were still in play. It was known that they were going to rendezvous with another boat to transfer the drugs that would, eventually, make their way to the US. It baffles me how much you want to defend people that are intentionally killing thousands of Americans. Why? You also defend illegal aliens that have killed, raped and stole from americans. Why? Why do you always defend our enemies?

You are admitting it, without admitting it. The goal was to cause someone on the military to disobey orders. It has been shown that none of the orders were illegal. Not one. The goal had nothing to do with helping soldiers enforce the law or resist illegal orders. The goal was to cause a soldier to resist legal orders to create a spectacle. Then "Let no good tragedy go to waste" becomes "Look, the military disagrees with the Nazi!" What they did was purely partisan and crossed the line into sedition. Unfortunately, the left is so partisan they won't turn on anyone they see as on their side. If this had been a conservative and the grand jury was in Texas or Florida, it would have gone to trial. But they were liberal and it was DC. Justice will forever be tarnished by their partisanship.

You did not answer my question. You just fell back on this appeal to authority fallacy.

And why did they remind them? What were these six trying ti get them to do? Do you even understand that every boat they blew up carried enough drugs to kill up to 13,000 Americans? That is not being selfish. That is protecting Americans. Nice try, but that was not their motivation.

Oh please. Where were you when the thought police shutdown YouTube accounts for saying masks don't work? This is not about free speech. All those people did was give their opinions on masks and our government strong armed social media into silencing them. Then they went out and arrested people that went to church or had Thanksgiving with friends and family. Your people tried to cause chaos. They wanted the chaos so they could point to it and amplify it. They wanted to say, "See! Even the military won't obey Trump!" It is the same playbook they are using in Minnesota. The same playbook they used in LA. The same playbook they used in Chicago. It is nothing new. Your side's leaders stick their heads out of their mansions, with Fort Knox worthy security, and demand that people resist. Then they go back and sip on their brandy and hope you are dumb enough to sacrifice your freedom or life just so they have a gotcha for the sunday morning political shows. And, for the most part, you have enough useful idìots on your side that it works. The play did not work with the military. Oh darn. Boo hoo. And now you're people had real consequences propsed. Oh the horror. They should. They tried to turn the military against the President. You know they did. That is why you continually ignore that that was the purpose of what they did. Because if you acknowledge the purpose of their actions, you have no choice but to conclude that they violated the law. There is no other option.

Yep. Go to a fair district and let them decide. Is it your contention that it is legal to plead with the military to disobey orders from the President?

It is not what is said but what the intent was. The intent was to turn at least some military members against the POTUS. That is blatantly illegal. And it should be. On the floor of the house/senate but not on YouTube. Free speech is not an issue here. The law is written. The House voted for it. The Senate voted for it. The POTUS signed it. The SCOTUS has not over turned it. It applies to all sides equally. You are just unhappy because your side can't have a revolution without consequences. It never went to court. What makes you think it went to court? It went to a grand jury in DC. Almost certainly it was full of LWNJs and they did not care about the law.

The freedom to speech is not absolute. Attempting to turn the military against the president is sedition. Whether they hoped for one, two, twenty or more, they wanted to turn some of the military into obstructionists. Their failure does not absolve them of responsibility either.

Saying that is like saying "Dont be mad, I missed" after shooting at someone. The intent is what matters, not the harm.

KCTV5 All they need is a suggestion that something may happen, and one of the blue terrorists jump into action. This is why calling the right fascists/nazis/racists is so dangerous. This is also why what Omar said about executing Trump is dangerous.