Jump to content

gatomontes99

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Everything posted by gatomontes99

  1. That is not what was said. What was said is that they were attempting to restart the program. This is a regime that killed 10,000+ people for protesting and you are playing stupid word games to satisfy your TDS. Wtf is wrong with you? Grow Up.
  2. https://x.com/i/status/2027651077865157033
  3. Something about freezing/slowing access is the reason.
  4. You are a LIAR! Your OPINION is meaningless! No PROOF!
  5. Yeah. What you "got" is a solid list of why the left is a cult.
  6. The WSJ is going to lose a $10B lawsuit regarding that lie that you willfully believe.
  7. Live on TV, Trump just announced that there is a possible deal for the US to takeover Cuba in a friendly takeover. This would be insanely good news for the Cuban people.
  8. Like when a President creates an intelligence brief that is fake a designed to undermine the in coming President? Would that count? Would a good example be dehumanizing critics/opposition by calling them fascists/nazis/racists? A. la. Minnesota? National Peace Institute? Would those qualify? Like when Eric Adams left the Democratic Party and was called all sorts of nasty names? Like when the radicals attacked AOC for not supporting violence against Israel or like when Fetterman says he gets the worst hate from his own party? Like KJP's book? Numerous stories about Hillary yelling and cussing at staff? Like white guilt? Like when they fawned over every word Joe Biden uttered, even if they didn't know what the word was? Like how Joe Biden was The Best President Of Our Time?
  9. Looks like bombs will drop on the next week.
  10. Willfully ignorant or just plain old ignorant? Constitution Center: Although the Elections Clause makes states primarily responsible for regulating congressional elections, it vests ultimate power in Congress. Congress may pass federal laws regulating congressional elections that automatically displace (“preempt”) any contrary state statutes, or enact its own regulations concerning those aspects of elections that states may not have addressed. The Framers of the Constitution were concerned that states might establish unfair election procedures or attempt to undermine the national government by refusing to hold elections for Congress. They empowered Congress to step in and regulate such elections as a self-defense mechanism.
  11. Hillary lied yesterday. Go figure. Proof? She pretended not to know Epstein by calling him Epstine. That is such a little kid lie. Who does not know how to say Epstein? Anyone? And she is pretending to be so ignorant of his name that she can't say it properly?
  12. Except the Constitution specifically conscribes the power to congress to regulate elections.
  13. Equivalency? How about fooking identical? ID is racist here and not there. /end To be clear, Schumer calling blacks to stupid and poor to get IDs isn't good enough. Average people calling blacks too stupid and poor to get IDs isn't good enough. Could it be that you won't believe anything that you don't want to believe? Gee. Where have I heard that appeal to authority fallacy before? Could it be the Hunter Biden laptop? Or the Russia Collusion Hoax? Or the tarrifs will cause the world to collapse into a black hole hysteria? Why do you guys fall for it and isn't it just a little too convenient that it is always a round number? Ok, if they aren't too stupid and poor (as your whole party suggests) then what is it? What makes it so racist to ask for IDs?
  14. The "tantrum" was a huge success: Trump’s speech seemed to rally some who watched it. In a survey conducted prior to the speech, 54% said they believed his policies would move the country in the right direction; afterward, 64% of the same people said his policies would take the country down the right path. The share who believed Trump has had the right priorities stood at 44% prior to the speech and 54% immediately following its conclusion. More people like Trump after he talked? That is a yuge win.
  15. No. I promised the entire thread on the notion that liberals believe that requiring an ID is racist and used the voter ID and employment ID as contrasting moments of hypocrisy. Because the first half of the video he shows white liberals in NYC talking about how blacks can't get an ID and the second half is blacks scoffing at what the white liberals say. His video directly contradicts your statement that liberals never said blacks are too stupid or too poor to get IDs. There is no attack on voting rights. It is especially not an attack on voting rights to prevent voter dilllution through security measures like requiring an ID to vote and reducing mail in ballots. NYT: Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises Just The Facts That is the true assault on voting rights. There you go again. Calling ot racist to require an ID because blacks are too stupid and too poor to get one.
  16. No. It is a strawman argument to use an argument that you made up as the starting point for your opposition. This debate is not about whether or not getting a job and voting are similar or dissimilar. The debate is over whether or not it is racist to require an ID or say that nonwhites don't know how to get one. So yeah, you are using this strawman. Aside from the fsct that Schumer publicly proclaimed that? How about this: How long will deny reality? I am truly interested. Fantasize much? You can't just make shit up. I have links, x posts and videos. Do you have anything besides your fantasies?
  17. Lol...still tilting at that strawman? Why? Is it because you don't have a way to explain that your side is using racist tropes to justify their opposition to a bill that is supported by well over 80% of Americans? You really like your strawman. You didn't say that? Are you fùcking kidding me? Jim Crow is the defacto reference when the left wants to call a law discriminatory against blacks. Saying that the SAVE Act discriminates against blacks must imply they are too stupid or too poor. Why else would they not be able to get an ID?
  18. How do you take outrage and call it glee? Sounds like projection.
  19. They never even reacted to our bombs, what makes you think they can reach the US?
  20. If it was anything other than embarrassing for the left, it would have lead the morning news.
  21. I think there might have been more dems from congress at that event than actual people.
  22. That was investigated. He took nothing. Biden tried to set him up and lost. Of course you believe the Biden DOJ lies. You also Believed the Obama administration lie of Russian collusion. Hell, you still believe that b.s.
×
×
  • Create New...