gatomontes99

The freedom to speech is not absolute. Attempting to turn the military against the president is sedition. Whether they hoped for one, two, twenty or more, they wanted to turn some of the military into obstructionists. Their failure does not absolve them of responsibility either.

Saying that is like saying "Dont be mad, I missed" after shooting at someone. The intent is what matters, not the harm.

KCTV5 All they need is a suggestion that something may happen, and one of the blue terrorists jump into action. This is why calling the right fascists/nazis/racists is so dangerous. This is also why what Omar said about executing Trump is dangerous.

They were trying to get the soldiers to disobey lawful orders in hopes that it would cause chaos. They had no interest in informing soldiers. the soldiers are taught everything they need to know. The Seditious Six were trying to cause problems. They should rot in jail.

Dallas Morning News: Inflation falls to five-year low as prices for fuel, housing slow growth The cost of food, gas, and apartment have soared since the pandemic. BLS: The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis in January, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 2.4 percent before seasonal adjustment. BLS: Real average hourly earnings for all employees increased 0.3 percent from December to January, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This result stems from an increase of 0.4 percent in average hourly earnings combined with an increase of 0.2 percent in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 130,000 in January, and the unemployment rate changed little at 4.3 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, social assistance, and construction, while federal government and financial activities lost job If the GDP comes out where they say it might, this will be insanely good.

You twist and turn and contort and try and try and try to make that out to be some perfectly innocent statement. But your doubts come through. I see them. I know you know that what she said was abhorrent. I can tell that you know she is calling for him to be killed. You just can't bring yourself to admit it. Fine. Your flaws aren't mine. You just can't handle real debate. I know you read every single post I make. You just reply to the ones where your wee little brain thinks it has an advantage. As soon as I reply with facts and sourced data, you run away. You always do. Isn't that just sweet*?

Uh, no. She called all Republicans and Trump pedophiles and said that in Somalia they execute pedophiles. That is not ambiguous. That is up front stating that Trump and Republicans should be executed. That is a violation of the law prohibiting threatening the POTUS and intimidating or threatening government officials. Two separate laws that she clearly violated.

2026 Winter Olympics Trans Athlete Rules Explained The above article explains why men can compete as women. But God forbid someone has a helmet memorializing their teammates: Ukraine’s Vladyslav Heraskevych out of Winter Olympics because of banned helmet honoring war dead Just shameful.

Oh, it is a stupid game when you have to ome to grips with all the times your side has tried to kill people for political gain? That should say something. 1. Charlie Kirk 2. Trump....twice 3. CBP/ICE....Twice 4. Minneapolis church h shooting 5. Nashville school shooting 6. Christmas parade driver 7. College violence against jews under the guise of Palestinian support 8. Failed attack on Benny Johnson And that is just off the top of my head. So, yeah, her call to violence is serious. It also violates the Brandenburg v Ohio principle. She specifically called for an individual to be attacked. On top of that, I listed the two statutes she violated in her call to violence.

Lazy spam bot strikes again!

In the past 100 years, how many times has the President used the government to execute a member of congress? Now do the left over the last two years and their attempts to kill people they disagree with.

Seditious behavior, punishable by death. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-for-execution-of-democratic-members-of-congress-in-shocking-barrage-of-posts/ar-AA1QPey5 The left swore up and down that he was going to execute the seditious six without a trial. He did not. But we know the foot soldiers that are the left will take Omar's statement and use it to justify another assasination attempt.

Uh no. She is clearly and unambiguously calling for the execution of the President.

First post: https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/59362-rep-omar-calls-for-the-execution-of-president-trump/

One of these days they will get Grambling or Southern or both to play the Superbowl halftime. That would be extremely entertaining and 1000% not controversial.

You are the one that said you have to talk down to blacks so they can understand. You are the resident racist here.

There is no way to read that and not conclude that she is calling for the execution of the President and implying Republicans should be executed as well.

2023 U.S. Code Title 18 - Crimes and Criminal Procedure Part I - Crimes Chapter 41 - Extortion and Threats Sec. 871 - Threats against President and successors to the Presidency --->https://law.justia.com/codes/us/title-18/part-i/chapter-41/sec-871/ LII U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 7 § 115 --->https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/115

I am going to steal kaleidoscope interpretation. Thats good.

The Epstein files literally show an email saying Trump never partook and that Trump gave sworn statements to the Police about how he thought Epstein and his biťch were evil. Further, most (if not all) of the guys in this dump were big liberal donors. So, tell me again how you can come up with such an asinine statment?

Increasingly higher and higher. Every time you set a bar and it gets exceeded, you just raise the bar. First you said his name is in the files so he is guilty of pedophilia. So you demanded to see the files. He issued an executive order to release the files. But that wasn't enough. So he signed a law to release the files and they were. That wasn't enough. The files disproved this pedophilia slander. So you said he knew so he should have told the police. The files proved that he did, so you said he only did it for political gain. But the testimony was ten years before he was charged and seven years before Trump ran. So now you say he should have said something sooner. It is comical. It is comical how blatant your goal post moving is.

Pretzel logic? She literally said she wanted the president killed. Even more, she implied all Republicans should be killed as well. Wow. That is comically bad.

*Right forum this time...hehe Censure is not enough. This is way to far. The Secret Service needs to investigate and recommend prosecution for her intentionally calling for the execution of the President.

And you are dumb enough to believe that you can get a fair trade deal with a country that uses slave labor.

Yep.